Total
211 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-29885 | 3 Apache, Debian, Oracle | 3 Tomcat, Debian Linux, Hospitality Cruise Shipboard Property Management System | 2024-02-28 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| The documentation of Apache Tomcat 10.1.0-M1 to 10.1.0-M14, 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.20, 9.0.13 to 9.0.62 and 8.5.38 to 8.5.78 for the EncryptInterceptor incorrectly stated it enabled Tomcat clustering to run over an untrusted network. This was not correct. While the EncryptInterceptor does provide confidentiality and integrity protection, it does not protect against all risks associated with running over any untrusted network, particularly DoS risks. | |||||
| CVE-2021-42340 | 4 Apache, Debian, Netapp and 1 more | 18 Tomcat, Debian Linux, Hci and 15 more | 2024-02-28 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| The fix for bug 63362 present in Apache Tomcat 10.1.0-M1 to 10.1.0-M5, 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.11, 9.0.40 to 9.0.53 and 8.5.60 to 8.5.71 introduced a memory leak. The object introduced to collect metrics for HTTP upgrade connections was not released for WebSocket connections once the connection was closed. This created a memory leak that, over time, could lead to a denial of service via an OutOfMemoryError. | |||||
| CVE-2021-41079 | 3 Apache, Debian, Netapp | 3 Tomcat, Debian Linux, Management Services For Element Software And Netapp Hci | 2024-02-28 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Apache Tomcat 8.5.0 to 8.5.63, 9.0.0-M1 to 9.0.43 and 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.2 did not properly validate incoming TLS packets. When Tomcat was configured to use NIO+OpenSSL or NIO2+OpenSSL for TLS, a specially crafted packet could be used to trigger an infinite loop resulting in a denial of service. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23181 | 3 Apache, Debian, Oracle | 7 Tomcat, Debian Linux, Agile Engineering Data Management and 4 more | 2024-02-28 | 3.7 LOW | 7.0 HIGH |
| The fix for bug CVE-2020-9484 introduced a time of check, time of use vulnerability into Apache Tomcat 10.1.0-M1 to 10.1.0-M8, 10.0.0-M5 to 10.0.14, 9.0.35 to 9.0.56 and 8.5.55 to 8.5.73 that allowed a local attacker to perform actions with the privileges of the user that the Tomcat process is using. This issue is only exploitable when Tomcat is configured to persist sessions using the FileStore. | |||||
| CVE-2021-30640 | 3 Apache, Debian, Oracle | 7 Tomcat, Debian Linux, Communications Cloud Native Core Policy and 4 more | 2024-02-28 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the JNDI Realm of Apache Tomcat allows an attacker to authenticate using variations of a valid user name and/or to bypass some of the protection provided by the LockOut Realm. This issue affects Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.5; 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.45; 8.5.0 to 8.5.65. | |||||
| CVE-2021-30639 | 3 Apache, Mcafee, Oracle | 3 Tomcat, Epolicy Orchestrator, Big Data Spatial And Graph | 2024-02-28 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in Apache Tomcat allows an attacker to remotely trigger a denial of service. An error introduced as part of a change to improve error handling during non-blocking I/O meant that the error flag associated with the Request object was not reset between requests. This meant that once a non-blocking I/O error occurred, all future requests handled by that request object would fail. Users were able to trigger non-blocking I/O errors, e.g. by dropping a connection, thereby creating the possibility of triggering a DoS. Applications that do not use non-blocking I/O are not exposed to this vulnerability. This issue affects Apache Tomcat 10.0.3 to 10.0.4; 9.0.44; 8.5.64. | |||||
| CVE-2021-33037 | 4 Apache, Debian, Mcafee and 1 more | 22 Tomcat, Tomee, Debian Linux and 19 more | 2024-02-28 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.6, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.46 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.66 did not correctly parse the HTTP transfer-encoding request header in some circumstances leading to the possibility to request smuggling when used with a reverse proxy. Specifically: - Tomcat incorrectly ignored the transfer encoding header if the client declared it would only accept an HTTP/1.0 response; - Tomcat honoured the identify encoding; and - Tomcat did not ensure that, if present, the chunked encoding was the final encoding. | |||||
| CVE-2021-25122 | 3 Apache, Debian, Oracle | 12 Tomcat, Debian Linux, Agile Plm and 9 more | 2024-02-28 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| When responding to new h2c connection requests, Apache Tomcat versions 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.41 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.61 could duplicate request headers and a limited amount of request body from one request to another meaning user A and user B could both see the results of user A's request. | |||||
| CVE-2021-25329 | 3 Apache, Debian, Oracle | 12 Tomcat, Debian Linux, Agile Plm and 9 more | 2024-02-28 | 4.4 MEDIUM | 7.0 HIGH |
| The fix for CVE-2020-9484 was incomplete. When using Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.41, 8.5.0 to 8.5.61 or 7.0.0. to 7.0.107 with a configuration edge case that was highly unlikely to be used, the Tomcat instance was still vulnerable to CVE-2020-9494. Note that both the previously published prerequisites for CVE-2020-9484 and the previously published mitigations for CVE-2020-9484 also apply to this issue. | |||||
| CVE-2021-24122 | 3 Apache, Debian, Oracle | 3 Tomcat, Debian Linux, Agile Plm | 2024-02-28 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| When serving resources from a network location using the NTFS file system, Apache Tomcat versions 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M9, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.39, 8.5.0 to 8.5.59 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.106 were susceptible to JSP source code disclosure in some configurations. The root cause was the unexpected behaviour of the JRE API File.getCanonicalPath() which in turn was caused by the inconsistent behaviour of the Windows API (FindFirstFileW) in some circumstances. | |||||
| CVE-2020-17527 | 4 Apache, Debian, Netapp and 1 more | 12 Tomcat, Debian Linux, Element Plug-in and 9 more | 2024-02-28 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| While investigating bug 64830 it was discovered that Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M9, 9.0.0-M1 to 9.0.39 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.59 could re-use an HTTP request header value from the previous stream received on an HTTP/2 connection for the request associated with the subsequent stream. While this would most likely lead to an error and the closure of the HTTP/2 connection, it is possible that information could leak between requests. | |||||