Total
211 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2011-0013 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2024-02-28 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the HTML Manager Interface in Apache Tomcat 5.5 before 5.5.32, 6.0 before 6.0.30, and 7.0 before 7.0.6 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML, as demonstrated via the display-name tag. | |||||
| CVE-2011-5062 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2024-02-28 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The HTTP Digest Access Authentication implementation in Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.34, 6.x before 6.0.33, and 7.x before 7.0.12 does not check qop values, which might allow remote attackers to bypass intended integrity-protection requirements via a qop=auth value, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-1184. | |||||
| CVE-2010-2227 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2024-02-28 | 6.4 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Apache Tomcat 5.5.0 through 5.5.29, 6.0.0 through 6.0.27, and 7.0.0 beta does not properly handle an invalid Transfer-Encoding header, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application outage) or obtain sensitive information via a crafted header that interferes with "recycling of a buffer." | |||||
| CVE-2011-4858 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2024-02-28 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Apache Tomcat before 5.5.35, 6.x before 6.0.35, and 7.x before 7.0.23 computes hash values for form parameters without restricting the ability to trigger hash collisions predictably, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) by sending many crafted parameters. | |||||
| CVE-2010-4172 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2024-02-28 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the Manager application in Apache Tomcat 6.0.12 through 6.0.29 and 7.0.0 through 7.0.4 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) orderBy or (2) sort parameter to sessionsList.jsp, or unspecified input to (3) sessionDetail.jsp or (4) java/org/apache/catalina/manager/JspHelper.java, related to use of untrusted web applications. | |||||
| CVE-2011-1475 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2024-02-28 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The HTTP BIO connector in Apache Tomcat 7.0.x before 7.0.12 does not properly handle HTTP pipelining, which allows remote attackers to read responses intended for other clients in opportunistic circumstances by examining the application data in HTTP packets, related to "a mix-up of responses for requests from different users." | |||||
| CVE-2011-5063 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2024-02-28 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The HTTP Digest Access Authentication implementation in Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.34, 6.x before 6.0.33, and 7.x before 7.0.12 does not check realm values, which might allow remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions by leveraging the availability of a protection space with weaker authentication or authorization requirements, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-1184. | |||||
| CVE-2011-2729 | 2 Apache, Linux | 3 Apache Commons Daemon, Tomcat, Linux Kernel | 2024-02-28 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| native/unix/native/jsvc-unix.c in jsvc in the Daemon component 1.0.3 through 1.0.6 in Apache Commons, as used in Apache Tomcat 5.5.32 through 5.5.33, 6.0.30 through 6.0.32, and 7.0.x before 7.0.20 on Linux, does not drop capabilities, which allows remote attackers to bypass read permissions for files via a request to an application. | |||||
| CVE-2011-1183 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2024-02-28 | 5.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Apache Tomcat 7.0.11, when web.xml has no login configuration, does not follow security constraints, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via HTTP requests to a meta-data complete web application. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incorrect fix for CVE-2011-1088 and CVE-2011-1419. | |||||
| CVE-2011-3376 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2024-02-28 | 4.4 MEDIUM | N/A |
| org/apache/catalina/core/DefaultInstanceManager.java in Apache Tomcat 7.x before 7.0.22 does not properly restrict ContainerServlets in the Manager application, which allows local users to gain privileges by using an untrusted web application to access the Manager application's functionality. | |||||
| CVE-2011-1582 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2024-02-28 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Apache Tomcat 7.0.12 and 7.0.13 processes the first request to a servlet without following security constraints that have been configured through annotations, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via HTTP requests. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2011-1088, CVE-2011-1183, and CVE-2011-1419. | |||||
| CVE-2009-2902 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2024-02-28 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Directory traversal vulnerability in Apache Tomcat 5.5.0 through 5.5.28 and 6.0.0 through 6.0.20 allows remote attackers to delete work-directory files via directory traversal sequences in a WAR filename, as demonstrated by the ...war filename. | |||||
| CVE-2011-5064 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2024-02-28 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| DigestAuthenticator.java in the HTTP Digest Access Authentication implementation in Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.34, 6.x before 6.0.33, and 7.x before 7.0.12 uses Catalina as the hard-coded server secret (aka private key), which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass cryptographic protection mechanisms by leveraging knowledge of this string, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-1184. | |||||
| CVE-2009-2693 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2024-02-28 | 5.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Directory traversal vulnerability in Apache Tomcat 5.5.0 through 5.5.28 and 6.0.0 through 6.0.20 allows remote attackers to create or overwrite arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) in an entry in a WAR file, as demonstrated by a ../../bin/catalina.bat entry. | |||||
| CVE-2009-2696 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 4 Tomcat, Desktop Workstation, Enterprise Linux and 1 more | 2024-02-28 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in jsp/cal/cal2.jsp in the calendar application in the examples web application in Apache Tomcat on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5, Desktop Workstation 5, and Linux Desktop 5 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the time parameter, related to "invalid HTML." NOTE: this is due to a missing fix for CVE-2009-0781. | |||||
| CVE-2011-0534 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2024-02-28 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Apache Tomcat 7.0.0 through 7.0.6 and 6.0.0 through 6.0.30 does not enforce the maxHttpHeaderSize limit for requests involving the NIO HTTP connector, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (OutOfMemoryError) via a crafted request. | |||||
| CVE-2011-2526 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2024-02-28 | 4.4 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.34, 6.x before 6.0.33, and 7.x before 7.0.19, when sendfile is enabled for the HTTP APR or HTTP NIO connector, does not validate certain request attributes, which allows local users to bypass intended file access restrictions or cause a denial of service (infinite loop or JVM crash) by leveraging an untrusted web application. | |||||
| CVE-2010-4312 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2024-02-28 | 6.4 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The default configuration of Apache Tomcat 6.x does not include the HTTPOnly flag in a Set-Cookie header, which makes it easier for remote attackers to hijack a session via script access to a cookie. | |||||
| CVE-2010-1157 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2024-02-28 | 2.6 LOW | N/A |
| Apache Tomcat 5.5.0 through 5.5.29 and 6.0.0 through 6.0.26 might allow remote attackers to discover the server's hostname or IP address by sending a request for a resource that requires (1) BASIC or (2) DIGEST authentication, and then reading the realm field in the WWW-Authenticate header in the reply. | |||||
| CVE-2011-1184 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2024-02-28 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The HTTP Digest Access Authentication implementation in Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.34, 6.x before 6.0.33, and 7.x before 7.0.12 does not have the expected countermeasures against replay attacks, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions by sniffing the network for valid requests, related to lack of checking of nonce (aka server nonce) and nc (aka nonce-count or client nonce count) values. | |||||