Total
6081 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-39394 | 1 Mm-wiki Project | 1 Mm-wiki | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| mm-wiki v0.2.1 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) which allows attackers to arbitrarily add user accounts and modify user information. | |||||
| CVE-2021-39353 | 1 Easyregistrationforms | 1 Easy Registration Forms | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| The Easy Registration Forms WordPress plugin is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery due to missing nonce validation via the ajax_add_form function found in the ~/includes/class-form.php file which made it possible for attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in versions up to, and including 2.1.1. | |||||
| CVE-2021-39243 | 1 Altus | 30 Hadron Xtorm Hx3040, Hadron Xtorm Hx3040 Firmware, Nexto Nx3003 and 27 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) exists on Altus Nexto, Nexto Xpress, and Hadron Xtorm devices via any CGI endpoint. This affects Nexto NX3003 1.8.11.0, Nexto NX3004 1.8.11.0, Nexto NX3005 1.8.11.0, Nexto NX3010 1.8.3.0, Nexto NX3020 1.8.3.0, Nexto NX3030 1.8.3.0, Nexto NX5100 1.8.11.0, Nexto NX5101 1.8.11.0, Nexto NX5110 1.1.2.8, Nexto NX5210 1.1.2.8, Nexto Xpress XP300 1.8.11.0, Nexto Xpress XP315 1.8.11.0, Nexto Xpress XP325 1.8.11.0, Nexto Xpress XP340 1.8.11.0, and Hadron Xtorm HX3040 1.7.58.0. | |||||
| CVE-2021-39209 | 1 Glpi-project | 1 Glpi | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| GLPI is a free Asset and IT management software package. In versions prior to 9.5.6, a user who is logged in to GLPI can bypass Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) protection in many places. This could allow a malicious actor to perform many actions on GLPI. This issue is fixed in version 9.5.6. There are no workarounds aside from upgrading. | |||||
| CVE-2021-39198 | 1 Oroinc | 1 Client Relationship Management | 2024-11-21 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 4.2 MEDIUM |
| OroCRM is an open source Client Relationship Management (CRM) application. Affected versions we found to suffer from a vulnerability which could an attacker is able to disqualify any Lead with a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack. There are no workarounds that address this vulnerability and all users are advised to update their package. | |||||
| CVE-2021-39197 | 1 Better Errors Project | 1 Better Errors | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 6.3 MEDIUM |
| better_errors is an open source replacement for the standard Rails error page with more information rich error pages. It is also usable outside of Rails in any Rack app as Rack middleware. better_errors prior to 2.8.0 did not implement CSRF protection for its internal requests. It also did not enforce the correct "Content-Type" header for these requests, which allowed a cross-origin "simple request" to be made without CORS protection. These together left an application with better_errors enabled open to cross-origin attacks. As a developer tool, better_errors documentation strongly recommends addition only to the `development` bundle group, so this vulnerability should only affect development environments. Please ensure that your project limits better_errors to the `development` group (or the non-Rails equivalent). Starting with release 2.8.x, CSRF protection is enforced. It is recommended that you upgrade to the latest release, or minimally to "~> 2.8.3". There are no known workarounds to mitigate the risk of using older releases of better_errors. | |||||
| CVE-2021-39133 | 1 Pagerduty | 1 Rundeck | 2024-11-21 | 6.0 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| Rundeck is an open source automation service with a web console, command line tools and a WebAPI. Prior to version 3.3.14 and version 3.4.3, a user with `admin` access to the `system` resource type is potentially vulnerable to a CSRF attack that could cause the server to run untrusted code on all Rundeck editions. Patches are available in Rundeck versions 3.4.3 and 3.3.14. | |||||
| CVE-2021-39126 | 1 Atlassian | 2 Jira Data Center, Jira Server | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Affected versions of Atlassian Jira Server and Data Center allow remote attackers to modify various resources via a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability, following an Information Disclosure vulnerability in the referrer headers which discloses a user's CSRF token. The affected versions are before version 8.5.10, and from version 8.6.0 before 8.13.1. | |||||
| CVE-2021-39124 | 1 Atlassian | 2 Data Center, Jira | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| The Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) failure retry feature of Atlassian Jira Server and Data Center before version 8.16.0 allows remote attackers who are able to trick a user into retrying a request to bypass CSRF protection and replay a crafted request. | |||||
| CVE-2021-39044 | 1 Ibm | 1 Financial Transaction Manager | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager 3.2.4 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 214210. | |||||
| CVE-2021-38886 | 2 Ibm, Netapp | 2 Cognos Analytics, Oncommand Insight | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| IBM Cognos Analytics 11.1.7, 11.2.0, and 11.1.7 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 209399. | |||||
| CVE-2021-38868 | 1 Ibm | 1 Engineering Requirements Quality Assistant On-premises | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM Engineering Requirements Quality Assistant On-Premises (All versions) is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force Id: 208310. | |||||
| CVE-2021-38721 | 1 Thedaylightstudio | 1 Fuel Cms | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| FUEL CMS 1.5.0 login.php contains a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2021-38705 | 1 Cliniccases | 1 Cliniccases | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| ClinicCases 7.3.3 is affected by Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). A successful attack would consist of an authenticated user following a malicious link, resulting in arbitrary actions being carried out with the privilege level of the targeted user. This can be exploited to create a secondary administrator account for the attacker. | |||||
| CVE-2021-38480 | 1 Inhandnetworks | 2 Ir615, Ir615 Firmware | 2024-11-21 | 9.3 HIGH | 9.6 CRITICAL |
| InHand Networks IR615 Router's Versions 2.3.0.r4724 and 2.3.0.r4870 are vulnerable to cross-site request forgery when unauthorized commands are submitted from a user the web application trusts. This may allow an attacker to remotely perform actions on the router’s management portal, such as making configuration changes, changing administrator credentials, and running system commands on the router. | |||||
| CVE-2021-38342 | 1 Kylephillips | 1 Nested Pages | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| The Nested Pages WordPress plugin <= 3.1.15 was vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery via the `npBulkAction`s and `npBulkEdit` `admin_post` actions, which allowed attackers to trash or permanently purge arbitrary posts as well as changing their status, reassigning their ownership, and editing other metadata. | |||||
| CVE-2021-37725 | 2 Arubanetworks, Siemens | 4 Arubaos, Sd-wan, Scalance W1750d and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 HIGH | 8.1 HIGH |
| A remote cross-site request forgery (csrf) vulnerability was discovered in Aruba SD-WAN Software and Gateways; Aruba Operating System Software version(s): Prior to 8.6.0.4-2.2.0.4; Prior to 8.8.0.1, 8.7.1.2, 8.6.0.8, 8.5.0.12, 8.3.0.15. Aruba has released patches for Aruba SD-WAN Software and Gateways and ArubaOS that address this security vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2021-37381 | 1 Southsoft | 1 Graduate Management Information System | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Southsoft GMIS 5.0 is vulnerable to CSRF attacks. Attackers can access other users' private information such as photos through CSRF. For example: any student's photo information can be accessed through /gmis/(S([1]))/student/grgl/PotoImageShow/?bh=[2]. Among them, the code in [1] is a random string generated according to the user's login related information. It can protect the user's identity, but it can not effectively prevent unauthorized access. The code in [2] is the student number of any student. The attacker can carry out CSRF attack on the system by modifying [2] without modifying [1]. | |||||
| CVE-2021-37366 | 1 Ctparental Project | 1 Ctparental | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| CTparental before 4.45.03 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF) in the CTparental admin panel. By combining CSRF with XSS, an attacker can trick the administrator into clicking a link that cancels the filtering for all standard users. | |||||
| CVE-2021-37234 | 1 Modern Honey Network Project | 1 Modern Honey Network | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Incorrect Access Control vulnerability in Modern Honey Network commit 0abf0db9cd893c6d5c727d036e1f817c02de4c7b allows remote attackers to view sensitive information via crafted PUT request to Web API. | |||||