Total
6146 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-12115 | 2024-12-07 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The Poll Maker – Versus Polls, Anonymous Polls, Image Polls plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.5.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the duplicate_poll() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to duplicate polls via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2024-27439 | 2024-12-06 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM | ||
| An error in the evaluation of the fetch metadata headers could allow a bypass of the CSRF protection in Apache Wicket. This issue affects Apache Wicket: from 9.1.0 through 9.16.0, and the milestone releases for the 10.0 series. Apache Wicket 8.x does not support CSRF protection via the fetch metadata headers and as such is not affected. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 9.17.0 or 10.0.0, which fixes the issue. | |||||
| CVE-2024-38344 | 2024-12-06 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM | ||
| A cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in WP Tweet Walls versions prior to 1.0.4. If this vulnerability is exploited, an attacker allows a user who logs in to the WordPress site where the affected plugin is enabled to access a malicious page. As a result, the user may perform unintended operations on the WordPress site. | |||||
| CVE-2024-10480 | 2024-12-06 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The 3DPrint Lite WordPress plugin before 2.1 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack. | |||||
| CVE-2024-54205 | 2024-12-06 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Paloma Paloma Widget allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Paloma Widget: from n/a through 1.14. | |||||
| CVE-2024-53809 | 2024-12-06 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Kiboko Labs Namaste! LMS allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Namaste! LMS: from n/a through 2.6.4.1. | |||||
| CVE-2024-12003 | 2024-12-06 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM | ||
| The WP System plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the generate_wp_system_page_content() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2024-11444 | 2024-12-06 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The CLUEVO LMS, E-Learning Platform plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.13.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the cluevo_render_module_ui() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete modules via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2024-11336 | 2024-12-06 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM | ||
| The Clickbank WordPress Plugin (Storefront) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.7. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation via the cs_menu page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2024-48846 | 2024-12-05 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH | ||
| Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerabilities where found providing a potiential for exposing sensitive information or changing system settings. Affected products: ABB ASPECT - Enterprise v3.08.02; NEXUS Series v3.08.02; MATRIX Series v3.08.02 | |||||
| CVE-2024-11341 | 2024-12-05 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The Simple Redirection plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the settings_page() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings and redirect all site visitors via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2024-26469 | 2024-12-04 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Tunis Soft "Product Designer" (productdesigner) module for PrestaShop before version 1.178.36, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (DoS) and escalate privileges via the url parameter in the postProcess() method. | |||||
| CVE-2024-26450 | 2024-12-04 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM | ||
| An issue exists within Piwigo before v.14.2.0 allowing a malicious user to take over the application. This exploit involves chaining a Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability to issue a Stored Cross Site Scripting payload stored within an Admin user's dashboard, executing remote JavaScript. This can be used to upload a new PHP file under an administrator and directly call that file from the victim's instance to connect back to a malicious listener. | |||||
| CVE-2023-50923 | 2024-12-04 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| In QUIC in RFC 9000, the Latency Spin Bit specification (section 17.4) does not strictly constrain the bit value when the feature is disabled, which might allow remote attackers to construct a covert channel with data represented as changes to the bit value. NOTE: The "Sheridan, S., Keane, A. (2015). In Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security (ECCWS), University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK." paper says "Modern Internet communication protocols provide an almost infinite number of ways in which data can be hidden or embed whithin seemingly normal network traffic." | |||||
| CVE-2024-11743 | 1 Mayurik | 1 Best House Rental Management System | 2024-12-04 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in SourceCodester Best House Rental Management System 1.0. Affected is an unknown function of the file /rental/ajax.php?action=delete_user of the component POST Request Handler. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | |||||
| CVE-2024-11673 | 1 1000projects | 1 Bookstore Management System | 2024-12-04 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in 1000 Projects Bookstore Management System 1.0. This issue affects some unknown processing. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | |||||
| CVE-2024-47879 | 1 Openrefine | 1 Openrefine | 2024-12-04 | N/A | 7.6 HIGH |
| OpenRefine is a free, open source tool for working with messy data. Prior to version 3.8.3, lack of cross-site request forgery protection on the `preview-expression` command means that visiting a malicious website could cause an attacker-controlled expression to be executed. The expression can contain arbitrary Clojure or Python code. The attacker must know a valid project ID of a project that contains at least one row, and the attacker must convince the victim to open a malicious webpage. Version 3.8.3 fixes the issue. | |||||
| CVE-2024-11813 | 2024-12-04 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM | ||
| The Pulsating Chat Button plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the amin_chat_button_settings_page() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2024-10832 | 2024-12-04 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM | ||
| The Posti Shipping plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.10.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the generate_notices_html() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2024-21032 | 1 Oracle | 1 Complex Maintenance Repair And Overhaul | 2024-12-03 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: LOV). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.13. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N). | |||||