Filtered by vendor Polarssl
Subscribe
Total
15 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2015-8036 | 5 Arm, Debian, Fedoraproject and 2 more | 5 Mbed Tls, Debian Linux, Fedora and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
Heap-based buffer overflow in ARM mbed TLS (formerly PolarSSL) 1.3.x before 1.3.14 and 2.x before 2.1.2 allows remote SSL servers to cause a denial of service (client crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a long session ticket name to the session ticket extension, which is not properly handled when creating a ClientHello message to resume a session. NOTE: this identifier was SPLIT from CVE-2015-5291 per ADT3 due to different affected version ranges. | |||||
CVE-2015-5291 | 5 Arm, Debian, Fedoraproject and 2 more | 6 Mbed Tls, Debian Linux, Fedora and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
Heap-based buffer overflow in PolarSSL 1.x before 1.2.17 and ARM mbed TLS (formerly PolarSSL) 1.3.x before 1.3.14 and 2.x before 2.1.2 allows remote SSL servers to cause a denial of service (client crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a long hostname to the server name indication (SNI) extension, which is not properly handled when creating a ClientHello message. NOTE: this identifier has been SPLIT per ADT3 due to different affected version ranges. See CVE-2015-8036 for the session ticket issue that was introduced in 1.3.0. | |||||
CVE-2015-1182 | 2 Opensuse, Polarssl | 2 Opensuse, Polarssl | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
The asn1_get_sequence_of function in library/asn1parse.c in PolarSSL 1.0 through 1.2.12 and 1.3.x through 1.3.9 does not properly initialize a pointer in the asn1_sequence linked list, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted ASN.1 sequence in a certificate. | |||||
CVE-2014-9744 | 2 Opensuse, Polarssl | 2 Opensuse, Polarssl | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 HIGH | N/A |
Memory leak in PolarSSL before 1.3.9 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a large number of ClientHello messages. NOTE: this identifier was SPLIT from CVE-2014-8628 per ADT3 due to different affected versions. | |||||
CVE-2014-8628 | 1 Polarssl | 1 Polarssl | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 HIGH | N/A |
Memory leak in PolarSSL before 1.2.12 and 1.3.x before 1.3.9 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a large number of crafted X.509 certificates. NOTE: this identifier has been SPLIT per ADT3 due to different affected versions. See CVE-2014-9744 for the ClientHello message issue. | |||||
CVE-2014-8627 | 1 Polarssl | 1 Polarssl | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
PolarSSL 1.3.8 does not properly negotiate the signature algorithm to use, which allows remote attackers to conduct downgrade attacks via unspecified vectors. | |||||
CVE-2014-4911 | 2 Debian, Polarssl | 2 Debian Linux, Polarssl | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
The ssl_decrypt_buf function in library/ssl_tls.c in PolarSSL before 1.2.11 and 1.3.x before 1.3.8 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via vectors related to the GCM ciphersuites, as demonstrated using the Codenomicon Defensics toolkit. | |||||
CVE-2013-5915 | 1 Polarssl | 1 Polarssl | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
The RSA-CRT implementation in PolarSSL before 1.2.9 does not properly perform Montgomery multiplication, which might allow remote attackers to conduct a timing side-channel attack and retrieve RSA private keys. | |||||
CVE-2013-5914 | 1 Polarssl | 1 Polarssl | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
Buffer overflow in the ssl_read_record function in ssl_tls.c in PolarSSL before 1.1.8, when using TLS 1.1, might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long packet. | |||||
CVE-2013-4623 | 1 Polarssl | 1 Polarssl | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
The x509parse_crt function in x509.h in PolarSSL 1.1.x before 1.1.7 and 1.2.x before 1.2.8 does not properly parse certificate messages during the SSL/TLS handshake, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop and CPU consumption) via a certificate message that contains a PEM encoded certificate. | |||||
CVE-2013-1621 | 1 Polarssl | 1 Polarssl | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
Array index error in the SSL module in PolarSSL before 1.2.5 might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service via vectors involving a crafted padding-length value during validation of CBC padding in a TLS session, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-0169. | |||||
CVE-2013-0169 | 3 Openssl, Oracle, Polarssl | 3 Openssl, Openjdk, Polarssl | 2024-11-21 | 2.6 LOW | N/A |
The TLS protocol 1.1 and 1.2 and the DTLS protocol 1.0 and 1.2, as used in OpenSSL, OpenJDK, PolarSSL, and other products, do not properly consider timing side-channel attacks on a MAC check requirement during the processing of malformed CBC padding, which allows remote attackers to conduct distinguishing attacks and plaintext-recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data for crafted packets, aka the "Lucky Thirteen" issue. | |||||
CVE-2012-2130 | 3 Debian, Fedoraproject, Polarssl | 3 Debian Linux, Fedora, Polarssl | 2024-11-21 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
A Security Bypass vulnerability exists in PolarSSL 0.99pre4 through 1.1.1 due to a weak encryption error when generating Diffie-Hellman values and RSA keys. | |||||
CVE-2011-4574 | 1 Polarssl | 1 Polarssl | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
PolarSSL versions prior to v1.1 use the HAVEGE random number generation algorithm. At its heart, this uses timing information based on the processor's high resolution timer (the RDTSC instruction). This instruction can be virtualized, and some virtual machine hosts have chosen to disable this instruction, returning 0s or predictable results. | |||||
CVE-2011-1923 | 1 Polarssl | 1 Polarssl | 2024-11-21 | 4.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
The Diffie-Hellman key-exchange implementation in dhm.c in PolarSSL before 0.14.2 does not properly validate a public parameter, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain the shared secret key by modifying network traffic, a related issue to CVE-2011-5095. |