Vulnerabilities (CVE)

Filtered by vendor Schneider-electric Subscribe

Filtered by product Modicon M340 Bmx Noe 0100

Total 4 CVE

CVE	Vendors	Products	Updated	CVSS v2	CVSS v3
CVE-2020-7564	1 Schneider-electric	40 Modicon M340 Bmx Noc 0401, Modicon M340 Bmx Noc 0401 Firmware, Modicon M340 Bmx Noe 0100 and 37 more	2024-11-21	6.5 MEDIUM	8.8 HIGH
A CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') vulnerability exists in the Web Server on Modicon M340, Modicon Quantum and Modicon Premium Legacy offers and their Communication Modules (see notification for details) which could cause write access and the execution of commands when uploading a specially crafted file on the controller over FTP.
CVE-2020-7563	1 Schneider-electric	40 Modicon M340 Bmx Noc 0401, Modicon M340 Bmx Noc 0401 Firmware, Modicon M340 Bmx Noe 0100 and 37 more	2024-11-21	6.5 MEDIUM	8.8 HIGH
A CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability exists in the Web Server on Modicon M340, Modicon Quantum and Modicon Premium Legacy offers and their Communication Modules (see notification for details) which could cause corruption of data, a crash, or code execution when uploading a specially crafted file on the controller over FTP.
CVE-2020-7562	1 Schneider-electric	40 Modicon M340 Bmx Noc 0401, Modicon M340 Bmx Noc 0401 Firmware, Modicon M340 Bmx Noe 0100 and 37 more	2024-11-21	5.8 MEDIUM	8.1 HIGH
A CWE-125: Out-of-Bounds Read vulnerability exists in the Web Server on Modicon M340, Modicon Quantum and Modicon Premium Legacy offers and their Communication Modules (see notification for details) which could cause a segmentation fault or a buffer overflow when uploading a specially crafted file on the controller over FTP.
CVE-2013-2763	1 Schneider-electric	24 Modicon M340 Bmx Noc 0401, Modicon M340 Bmx Noc 0401 Firmware, Modicon M340 Bmx Noe 0100 and 21 more	2024-11-21	5.0 MEDIUM	N/A
The Schneider Electric M340 PLC modules allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (resource consumption) via unspecified vectors. NOTE: the vendor reportedly disputes this issue because it "could not be duplicated" and "an attacker could not remotely exploit this observed behavior to deny PLC control functions.