Filtered by vendor Siemens
Subscribe
Total
1848 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-35212 | 1 Siemens | 1 Sinec Traffic Analyzer | 2024-08-06 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SINEC Traffic Analyzer (6GK8822-1BG01-0BA0) (All versions < V1.2). The affected application lacks input validation due to which an attacker can gain access to the Database entries. | |||||
| CVE-2024-35211 | 1 Siemens | 1 Sinec Traffic Analyzer | 2024-08-06 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SINEC Traffic Analyzer (6GK8822-1BG01-0BA0) (All versions < V1.2). The affected web server, after a successful login, sets the session cookie on the browser, without applying any security attributes (such as “Secure”, “HttpOnly”, or “SameSite”). | |||||
| CVE-2024-35210 | 1 Siemens | 1 Sinec Traffic Analyzer | 2024-08-06 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SINEC Traffic Analyzer (6GK8822-1BG01-0BA0) (All versions < V1.2). The affected web server is not enforcing HSTS. This could allow an attacker to perform downgrade attacks exposing confidential information. | |||||
| CVE-2024-35209 | 1 Siemens | 1 Sinec Traffic Analyzer | 2024-08-06 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SINEC Traffic Analyzer (6GK8822-1BG01-0BA0) (All versions < V1.2). The affected web server is allowing HTTP methods like PUT and Delete. This could allow an attacker to modify unauthorized files. | |||||
| CVE-2024-35208 | 1 Siemens | 1 Sinec Traffic Analyzer | 2024-08-06 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SINEC Traffic Analyzer (6GK8822-1BG01-0BA0) (All versions < V1.2). The affected web server stored the password in cleartext. This could allow attacker in a privileged position to obtain access passwords. | |||||
| CVE-2024-35207 | 1 Siemens | 1 Sinec Traffic Analyzer | 2024-08-06 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SINEC Traffic Analyzer (6GK8822-1BG01-0BA0) (All versions < V1.2). The web interface of the affected devices are vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery(CSRF) attacks. By tricking an authenticated victim user to click a malicious link, an attacker could perform arbitrary actions on the device on behalf of the victim user. | |||||
| CVE-2024-35206 | 1 Siemens | 1 Sinec Traffic Analyzer | 2024-08-06 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SINEC Traffic Analyzer (6GK8822-1BG01-0BA0) (All versions < V1.2). The affected application does not expire the session. This could allow an attacker to get unauthorized access. | |||||
| CVE-2016-20009 | 2 Siemens, Windriver | 15 Sgt-100, Sgt-100 Firmware, Sgt-200 and 12 more | 2024-08-06 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A DNS client stack-based buffer overflow in ipdnsc_decode_name() affects Wind River VxWorks 6.5 through 7. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer | |||||
| CVE-2019-0708 | 3 Huawei, Microsoft, Siemens | 131 Agile Controller-campus, Agile Controller-campus Firmware, Bh620 V2 and 128 more | 2024-07-25 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Services formerly known as Terminal Services when an unauthenticated attacker connects to the target system using RDP and sends specially crafted requests, aka 'Remote Desktop Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. | |||||
| CVE-2017-0143 | 3 Microsoft, Philips, Siemens | 28 Server Message Block, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1511 and 25 more | 2024-07-25 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT 8.1; and Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607; and Windows Server 2016 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets, aka "Windows SMB Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0144, CVE-2017-0145, CVE-2017-0146, and CVE-2017-0148. | |||||
| CVE-2021-44228 | 12 Apache, Apple, Bentley and 9 more | 157 Log4j, Xcode, Synchro and 154 more | 2024-07-24 | 9.3 HIGH | 10.0 CRITICAL |
| Apache Log4j2 2.0-beta9 through 2.15.0 (excluding security releases 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1) JNDI features used in configuration, log messages, and parameters do not protect against attacker controlled LDAP and other JNDI related endpoints. An attacker who can control log messages or log message parameters can execute arbitrary code loaded from LDAP servers when message lookup substitution is enabled. From log4j 2.15.0, this behavior has been disabled by default. From version 2.16.0 (along with 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1), this functionality has been completely removed. Note that this vulnerability is specific to log4j-core and does not affect log4net, log4cxx, or other Apache Logging Services projects. | |||||
| CVE-2021-40438 | 9 Apache, Broadcom, Debian and 6 more | 18 Http Server, Brocade Fabric Operating System Firmware, Debian Linux and 15 more | 2024-07-24 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 9.0 CRITICAL |
| A crafted request uri-path can cause mod_proxy to forward the request to an origin server choosen by the remote user. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 and earlier. | |||||
| CVE-2017-0145 | 2 Microsoft, Siemens | 27 Server Message Block, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1511 and 24 more | 2024-07-24 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT 8.1; and Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607; and Windows Server 2016 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets, aka "Windows SMB Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0143, CVE-2017-0144, CVE-2017-0146, and CVE-2017-0148. | |||||
| CVE-2017-0144 | 2 Microsoft, Siemens | 27 Server Message Block, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1511 and 24 more | 2024-07-24 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT 8.1; and Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607; and Windows Server 2016 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets, aka "Windows SMB Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0143, CVE-2017-0145, CVE-2017-0146, and CVE-2017-0148. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8562 | 1 Siemens | 4 Simatic Cp 1543-1, Simatic Cp 1543-1 Firmware, Siplus Net Cp 1543-1 and 1 more | 2024-07-24 | 3.5 LOW | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC CP 1543-1 (All versions < V2.0.28), SIPLUS NET CP 1543-1 (All versions < V2.0.28). Under special conditions it was possible to write SNMP variables on port 161/udp which should be read-only and should only be configured with TIA-Portal. A write to these variables could reduce the availability or cause a denial-of-service. | |||||
| CVE-2021-33627 | 2 Insyde, Siemens | 29 Insydeh2o, Simatic Field Pg M5, Simatic Field Pg M5 Firmware and 26 more | 2024-07-22 | 7.2 HIGH | 8.2 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Insyde InsydeH2O Kernel 5.0 before 05.09.11, 5.1 before 05.17.11, 5.2 before 05.27.11, 5.3 before 05.36.11, 5.4 before 05.44.11, and 5.5 before 05.52.11 affecting FwBlockServiceSmm. Software SMI services that use the Communicate() function of the EFI_SMM_COMMUNICATION_PROTOCOL do not check whether the address of the buffer is valid, which allows use of SMRAM, MMIO, or OS kernel addresses. | |||||
| CVE-2017-0146 | 2 Microsoft, Siemens | 27 Server Message Block, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1511 and 24 more | 2024-07-16 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT 8.1; and Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607; and Windows Server 2016 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets, aka "Windows SMB Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0143, CVE-2017-0144, CVE-2017-0145, and CVE-2017-0148. | |||||
| CVE-2024-37999 | 1 Siemens | 1 Medicalis Workflow Orchestrator | 2024-07-11 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Medicalis Workflow Orchestrator (All versions). The affected application executes as a trusted account with high privileges and network access. This could allow an authenticated local attacker to escalate privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2017-0148 | 2 Microsoft, Siemens | 27 Server Message Block, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1511 and 24 more | 2024-07-09 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.1 HIGH |
| The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT 8.1; and Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607; and Windows Server 2016 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets, aka "Windows SMB Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0143, CVE-2017-0144, CVE-2017-0145, and CVE-2017-0146. | |||||
| CVE-2023-44315 | 1 Siemens | 1 Sinec Nms | 2024-07-09 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SINEC NMS (All versions < V2.0). The affected application improperly sanitizes certain SNMP configuration data retrieved from monitored devices. An attacker with access to a monitored device could prepare a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) attack that may lead to unintentional modification of application data by legitimate users. | |||||