Total
213 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-11477 | 6 Canonical, F5, Ivanti and 3 more | 24 Ubuntu Linux, Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager and 21 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| Jonathan Looney discovered that the TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->tcp_gso_segs value was subject to an integer overflow in the Linux kernel when handling TCP Selective Acknowledgments (SACKs). A remote attacker could use this to cause a denial of service. This has been fixed in stable kernel releases 4.4.182, 4.9.182, 4.14.127, 4.19.52, 5.1.11, and is fixed in commit 3b4929f65b0d8249f19a50245cd88ed1a2f78cff. | |||||
| CVE-2019-10744 | 5 F5, Lodash, Netapp and 2 more | 21 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 18 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Versions of lodash lower than 4.17.12 are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution. The function defaultsDeep could be tricked into adding or modifying properties of Object.prototype using a constructor payload. | |||||
| CVE-2018-5743 | 2 F5, Isc | 17 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 14 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| By design, BIND is intended to limit the number of TCP clients that can be connected at any given time. The number of allowed connections is a tunable parameter which, if unset, defaults to a conservative value for most servers. Unfortunately, the code which was intended to limit the number of simultaneous connections contained an error which could be exploited to grow the number of simultaneous connections beyond this limit. Versions affected: BIND 9.9.0 -> 9.10.8-P1, 9.11.0 -> 9.11.6, 9.12.0 -> 9.12.4, 9.14.0. BIND 9 Supported Preview Edition versions 9.9.3-S1 -> 9.11.5-S3, and 9.11.5-S5. Versions 9.13.0 -> 9.13.7 of the 9.13 development branch are also affected. Versions prior to BIND 9.9.0 have not been evaluated for vulnerability to CVE-2018-5743. | |||||
| CVE-2018-5542 | 1 F5 | 13 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 10 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| F5 BIG-IP 13.0.0-13.0.1, 12.1.0-12.1.3.6, or 11.2.1-11.6.3.2 HTTPS health monitors do not validate the identity of the monitored server. | |||||
| CVE-2018-5537 | 1 F5 | 10 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Application Acceleration Manager and 7 more | 2024-11-21 | 2.6 LOW | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| A remote attacker may be able to disrupt services on F5 BIG-IP 13.0.0-13.1.0.5, 12.1.0-12.1.3.5, 11.6.0-11.6.3.1, or 11.2.1-11.5.6 if the TMM virtual server is configured with a HTML or a Rewrite profile. TMM may restart while processing some specially prepared HTML content from the back end. | |||||
| CVE-2018-5535 | 1 F5 | 13 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 10 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| On F5 BIG-IP 14.0.0, 13.0.0-13.1.0, 12.1.0-12.1.3, or 11.5.1-11.6.3 specifically crafted HTTP responses, when processed by a Virtual Server with an associated QoE profile that has Video enabled, may cause TMM to incorrectly buffer response data causing the TMM to restart resulting in a Denial of Service. | |||||
| CVE-2018-5534 | 1 F5 | 13 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 10 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Under certain conditions on F5 BIG-IP 13.1.0-13.1.0.5, 13.0.0, 12.1.0-12.1.3.1, 11.6.0-11.6.3.1, or 11.5.0-11.5.6, TMM may core while processing SSL forward proxy traffic. | |||||
| CVE-2018-5533 | 1 F5 | 13 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 10 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Under certain conditions on F5 BIG-IP 13.0.0, 12.1.0-12.1.2, 11.6.0-11.6.3.1, or 11.5.0-11.5.6, TMM may core while processing SSL forward proxy traffic. | |||||
| CVE-2018-5532 | 1 F5 | 13 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 10 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| On F5 BIG-IP 13.0.0, 12.1.0-12.1.2, 11.6.0-11.6.3.1, or 11.2.1-11.5.6 a domain name cached within the DNS Cache of TMM may continue to be resolved by the cache even after the parent server revokes the record, if the DNS Cache is receiving a stream of requests for the cached name. | |||||
| CVE-2018-5531 | 1 F5 | 13 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 10 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.1 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| Through undisclosed methods, on F5 BIG-IP 13.0.0-13.1.0.7, 12.1.0-12.1.3.5, 11.6.0-11.6.3.1, or 11.2.1-11.5.6, adjacent network attackers can cause a denial of service for VCMP guest and host systems. Attack must be sourced from adjacent network (layer 2). | |||||
| CVE-2018-5530 | 1 F5 | 9 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 6 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| F5 BIG-IP 13.0.0-13.1.0.5, 12.1.0-12.1.3.5, or 11.6.0-11.6.3.1 virtual servers with HTTP/2 profiles enabled are vulnerable to "HPACK Bomb". | |||||
| CVE-2018-5527 | 1 F5 | 13 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 10 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| On BIG-IP 13.1.0-13.1.0.7, a remote attacker using undisclosed methods against virtual servers configured with a Client SSL or Server SSL profile that has the SSL Forward Proxy feature enabled can force the Traffic Management Microkernel (tmm) to leak memory. As a result, system memory usage increases over time, which may eventually cause a decrease in performance or a system reboot due to memory exhaustion. | |||||
| CVE-2018-5525 | 1 F5 | 13 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 10 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| A local file vulnerability exists in the F5 BIG-IP Configuration utility on versions 13.0.0, 12.1.0-12.1.2, 11.6.1-11.6.3.1, 11.5.1-11.5.5, or 11.2.1 that exposes files containing F5-provided data only and do not include any configuration data, proxied traffic, or other potentially sensitive customer data. | |||||
| CVE-2018-5524 | 1 F5 | 11 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 8 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Under certain conditions, on F5 BIG-IP 13.0.0-13.1.0.5, 12.1.0-12.1.3.1, or 11.6.1 HF2-11.6.3.1, virtual servers configured with Client SSL or Server SSL profiles which make use of network hardware security module (HSM) functionality are exposed and impacted by this issue. | |||||
| CVE-2018-5523 | 1 F5 | 14 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 11 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| On F5 BIG-IP 13.1.0-13.1.0.3, 13.0.0, 12.1.0-12.1.3.1, 11.6.1-11.6.3.1, 11.5.1-11.5.5, or 11.2.1 and Enterprise Manager 3.1.1, when authenticated administrative users run commands in the Traffic Management User Interface (TMUI), also referred to as the BIG-IP Configuration utility, restrictions on allowed commands may not be enforced. | |||||
| CVE-2018-5522 | 1 F5 | 13 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 10 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| On F5 BIG-IP 13.0.0, 12.0.0-12.1.2, 11.6.1-11.6.3.1, 11.5.1-11.5.5, or 11.2.1, when processing DIAMETER transactions with carefully crafted attribute-value pairs, TMM may crash. | |||||
| CVE-2018-5521 | 1 F5 | 13 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 10 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| On F5 BIG-IP 12.1.0-12.1.3.1, 11.6.1-11.6.3.1, 11.5.1-11.5.5, or 11.2.1, carefully crafted URLs can be used to reflect arbitrary content into GeoIP lookup responses, potentially exposing clients to XSS. | |||||
| CVE-2018-5520 | 1 F5 | 13 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 10 more | 2024-11-21 | 3.5 LOW | 4.4 MEDIUM |
| On an F5 BIG-IP 13.0.0-13.1.0.5, 12.1.0-12.1.3.1, or 11.2.1-11.6.3.1 system configured in Appliance mode, the TMOS Shell (tmsh) may allow an administrative user to use the dig utility to gain unauthorized access to file system resources. | |||||
| CVE-2018-5519 | 1 F5 | 13 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 10 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 4.9 MEDIUM |
| On F5 BIG-IP 13.0.0-13.1.0.5, 12.1.0-12.1.3.3, or 11.2.1-11.6.3.1, administrative users by way of undisclosed methods can exploit the ssldump utility to write to arbitrary file paths. For users who do not have Advanced Shell access (for example, any user when licensed for Appliance Mode), this allows more permissive file access than intended. | |||||
| CVE-2018-5518 | 1 F5 | 13 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 10 more | 2024-11-21 | 2.3 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| On F5 BIG-IP 13.0.0-13.1.0.5 or 12.0.0-12.1.3.3, malicious root users with access to a VCMP guest can cause a disruption of service on adjacent VCMP guests running on the same host. Exploiting this vulnerability causes the vCMPd process on the adjacent VCMP guest to restart and produce a core file. This issue is only exploitable on a VCMP guest which is operating in "host-only" or "bridged" mode. VCMP guests which are "isolated" are not impacted by this issue and do not provide mechanism to exploit the vulnerability. Guests which are deployed in "Appliance Mode" may be impacted however the exploit is not possible from an Appliance Mode guest. To exploit this vulnerability root access on a guest system deployed as "host-only" or "bridged" mode is required. | |||||