Filtered by vendor Tenable
Subscribe
Total
144 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-5812 | 1 Tenable | 1 Nessus Amazon Machine Image | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| Nessus AMI versions 8.12.0 and earlier were found to either not validate, or incorrectly validate, a certificate which could allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by using a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack. | |||||
| CVE-2020-5808 | 1 Tenable | 1 Tenable.sc | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| In certain scenarios in Tenable.sc prior to 5.17.0, a scanner could potentially be used outside the user's defined scan zone without a particular zone being specified within the Automatic Distribution configuration. | |||||
| CVE-2020-5794 | 2 Microsoft, Tenable | 2 Windows, Nessus Network Monitor | 2024-11-21 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in Nessus Network Monitor versions 5.11.0, 5.11.1, and 5.12.0 for Windows could allow an authenticated local attacker to execute arbitrary code by copying user-supplied files to a specially constructed path in a specifically named user directory. The attacker needs valid credentials on the Windows system to exploit this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2020-5793 | 2 Microsoft, Tenable | 3 Windows, Nessus, Nessus Agent | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in Nessus versions 8.9.0 through 8.12.0 for Windows & Nessus Agent 8.0.0 and 8.1.0 for Windows could allow an authenticated local attacker to copy user-supplied files to a specially constructed path in a specifically named user directory. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by creating a malicious file and copying the file to a system directory. The attacker needs valid credentials on the Windows system to exploit this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2020-5774 | 1 Tenable | 1 Nessus | 2024-11-21 | 3.6 LOW | 7.1 HIGH |
| Nessus versions 8.11.0 and earlier were found to maintain sessions longer than the permitted period in certain scenarios. The lack of proper session expiration could allow attackers with local access to login into an existing browser session. | |||||
| CVE-2020-5765 | 1 Tenable | 1 Nessus | 2024-11-21 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Nessus 8.10.0 and earlier were found to contain a Stored XSS vulnerability due to improper validation of input during scan configuration. An authenticated, remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in a user's session. Tenable has implemented additional input validation mechanisms to correct this issue in Nessus 8.11.0. | |||||
| CVE-2020-5737 | 1 Tenable | 1 Tenable.sc | 2024-11-21 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Stored XSS in Tenable.Sc before 5.14.0 could allow an authenticated remote attacker to craft a request to execute arbitrary script code in a user's browser session. Updated input validation techniques have been implemented to correct this issue. | |||||
| CVE-2020-1971 | 8 Debian, Fedoraproject, Netapp and 5 more | 46 Debian Linux, Fedora, Active Iq Unified Manager and 43 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| The X.509 GeneralName type is a generic type for representing different types of names. One of those name types is known as EDIPartyName. OpenSSL provides a function GENERAL_NAME_cmp which compares different instances of a GENERAL_NAME to see if they are equal or not. This function behaves incorrectly when both GENERAL_NAMEs contain an EDIPARTYNAME. A NULL pointer dereference and a crash may occur leading to a possible denial of service attack. OpenSSL itself uses the GENERAL_NAME_cmp function for two purposes: 1) Comparing CRL distribution point names between an available CRL and a CRL distribution point embedded in an X509 certificate 2) When verifying that a timestamp response token signer matches the timestamp authority name (exposed via the API functions TS_RESP_verify_response and TS_RESP_verify_token) If an attacker can control both items being compared then that attacker could trigger a crash. For example if the attacker can trick a client or server into checking a malicious certificate against a malicious CRL then this may occur. Note that some applications automatically download CRLs based on a URL embedded in a certificate. This checking happens prior to the signatures on the certificate and CRL being verified. OpenSSL's s_server, s_client and verify tools have support for the "-crl_download" option which implements automatic CRL downloading and this attack has been demonstrated to work against those tools. Note that an unrelated bug means that affected versions of OpenSSL cannot parse or construct correct encodings of EDIPARTYNAME. However it is possible to construct a malformed EDIPARTYNAME that OpenSSL's parser will accept and hence trigger this attack. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 versions are affected by this issue. Other OpenSSL releases are out of support and have not been checked. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1i (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1h). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2x (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2w). | |||||
| CVE-2020-1967 | 10 Broadcom, Debian, Fedoraproject and 7 more | 26 Fabric Operating System, Debian Linux, Fedora and 23 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Server or client applications that call the SSL_check_chain() function during or after a TLS 1.3 handshake may crash due to a NULL pointer dereference as a result of incorrect handling of the "signature_algorithms_cert" TLS extension. The crash occurs if an invalid or unrecognised signature algorithm is received from the peer. This could be exploited by a malicious peer in a Denial of Service attack. OpenSSL version 1.1.1d, 1.1.1e, and 1.1.1f are affected by this issue. This issue did not affect OpenSSL versions prior to 1.1.1d. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1g (Affected 1.1.1d-1.1.1f). | |||||
| CVE-2020-11656 | 5 Netapp, Oracle, Siemens and 2 more | 12 Ontap Select Deploy Administration Utility, Communications Messaging Server, Communications Network Charging And Control and 9 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In SQLite through 3.31.1, the ALTER TABLE implementation has a use-after-free, as demonstrated by an ORDER BY clause that belongs to a compound SELECT statement. | |||||
| CVE-2020-11655 | 7 Canonical, Debian, Netapp and 4 more | 18 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Ontap Select Deploy Administration Utility and 15 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| SQLite through 3.31.1 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault) via a malformed window-function query because the AggInfo object's initialization is mishandled. | |||||
| CVE-2020-11023 | 7 Debian, Drupal, Fedoraproject and 4 more | 55 Debian Linux, Drupal, Fedora and 52 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.9 MEDIUM |
| In jQuery versions greater than or equal to 1.0.3 and before 3.5.0, passing HTML containing <option> elements from untrusted sources - even after sanitizing it - to one of jQuery's DOM manipulation methods (i.e. .html(), .append(), and others) may execute untrusted code. This problem is patched in jQuery 3.5.0. | |||||
| CVE-2020-11022 | 8 Debian, Drupal, Fedoraproject and 5 more | 78 Debian Linux, Drupal, Fedora and 75 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.9 MEDIUM |
| In jQuery versions greater than or equal to 1.2 and before 3.5.0, passing HTML from untrusted sources - even after sanitizing it - to one of jQuery's DOM manipulation methods (i.e. .html(), .append(), and others) may execute untrusted code. This problem is patched in jQuery 3.5.0. | |||||
| CVE-2019-8331 | 4 F5, Getbootstrap, Redhat and 1 more | 16 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 13 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| In Bootstrap before 3.4.1 and 4.3.x before 4.3.1, XSS is possible in the tooltip or popover data-template attribute. | |||||
| CVE-2019-3982 | 1 Tenable | 1 Nessus | 2024-11-21 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Nessus versions 8.6.0 and earlier were found to contain a Denial of Service vulnerability due to improper validation of specific imported scan types. An authenticated, remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to cause a Nessus scanner to become temporarily unresponsive. | |||||
| CVE-2019-3974 | 2 Microsoft, Tenable | 2 Windows, Nessus | 2024-11-21 | 8.5 HIGH | 8.1 HIGH |
| Nessus 8.5.2 and earlier on Windows platforms were found to contain an issue where certain system files could be overwritten arbitrarily, potentially creating a denial of service condition. | |||||
| CVE-2019-3962 | 1 Tenable | 1 Nessus | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 3.3 LOW |
| Content Injection vulnerability in Tenable Nessus prior to 8.5.0 may allow an authenticated, local attacker to exploit this vulnerability by convincing another targeted Nessus user to view a malicious URL and use Nessus to send fraudulent messages. Successful exploitation could allow the authenticated adversary to inject arbitrary text into the feed status, which will remain saved post session expiration. | |||||
| CVE-2019-3961 | 1 Tenable | 1 Nessus | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Nessus versions 8.4.0 and earlier were found to contain a reflected XSS vulnerability due to improper validation of user-supplied input. An unauthenticated, remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability via a specially crafted request to execute arbitrary script code in a users browser session. | |||||
| CVE-2019-3923 | 1 Tenable | 1 Nessus | 2024-11-21 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Nessus versions 8.2.1 and earlier were found to contain a stored XSS vulnerability due to improper validation of user-supplied input. An authenticated, remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability via a specially crafted request to execute arbitrary script code in a user's browser session. Tenable has released Nessus 8.2.2 to address this issue. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1559 | 13 Canonical, Debian, F5 and 10 more | 90 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Big-ip Access Policy Manager and 87 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte record is received with invalid padding compared to if a 0 byte record is received with an invalid MAC. If the application then behaves differently based on that in a way that is detectable to the remote peer, then this amounts to a padding oracle that could be used to decrypt data. In order for this to be exploitable "non-stitched" ciphersuites must be in use. Stitched ciphersuites are optimised implementations of certain commonly used ciphersuites. Also the application must call SSL_shutdown() twice even if a protocol error has occurred (applications should not do this but some do anyway). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2r (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2q). | |||||