Total
451 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-10912 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-02-28 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.0.29478. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the SetFieldValue command of the communication API. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9945. | |||||
| CVE-2020-1421 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Windows 10, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2019 | 2024-02-28 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Microsoft Windows that could allow remote code execution if a .LNK file is processed.An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the local user, aka 'LNK Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. | |||||
| CVE-2020-0336 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2024-02-28 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| In SurfaceFlinger, there is possible memory corruption due to type confusion. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-11Android ID: A-153467444 | |||||
| CVE-2019-8250 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 4 Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader Dc, Macos and 1 more | 2024-02-28 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.012.20035 and earlier, 2019.012.20035 and earlier, 2017.011.30142 and earlier, 2017.011.30143 and earlier, 2015.006.30497 and earlier, and 2015.006.30498 and earlier have a type confusion vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution . | |||||
| CVE-2019-8251 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 4 Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader Dc, Macos and 1 more | 2024-02-28 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.012.20035 and earlier, 2019.012.20035 and earlier, 2017.011.30142 and earlier, 2017.011.30143 and earlier, 2015.006.30497 and earlier, and 2015.006.30498 and earlier have a type confusion vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to information disclosure. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15656 | 3 Canonical, Mozilla, Opensuse | 5 Ubuntu Linux, Firefox, Firefox Esr and 2 more | 2024-02-28 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| JIT optimizations involving the Javascript arguments object could confuse later optimizations. This risk was already mitigated by various precautions in the code, resulting in this bug rated at only moderate severity. This vulnerability affects Firefox ESR < 78.1, Firefox < 79, and Thunderbird < 78.1. | |||||
| CVE-2020-7081 | 1 Autodesk | 1 Fbx Software Development Kit | 2024-02-28 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| A type confusion vulnerability in the Autodesk FBX-SDK versions 2019.0 and earlier may lead to arbitary code read/write on the system running it. | |||||
| CVE-2020-25016 | 1 Rgb-rust Project | 1 Rgb-rust | 2024-02-28 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| A safety violation was discovered in the rgb crate before 0.8.20 for Rust, leading to (for example) dereferencing of arbitrary pointers or disclosure of uninitialized memory. This occurs because structs can be treated as bytes for read and write operations. | |||||
| CVE-2019-20584 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2024-02-28 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered on Samsung mobile devices with O(8.x) and P(9.0) (with TEEGRIS) software. There is type confusion in the HDCP Trustlet, leading to arbitrary code execution. The Samsung ID is SVE-2019-14850 (August 2019). | |||||
| CVE-2019-20588 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2024-02-28 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered on Samsung mobile devices with O(8.x) and P(9.0) (with TEEGRIS) software. There is type confusion in the SEM Trustlet, leading to arbitrary code execution. The Samsung ID is SVE-2019-14891 (August 2019). | |||||
| CVE-2020-3901 | 1 Apple | 7 Icloud, Ipad Os, Iphone Os and 4 more | 2024-02-28 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A type confusion issue was addressed with improved memory handling. This issue is fixed in iOS 13.4 and iPadOS 13.4, tvOS 13.4, watchOS 6.2, Safari 13.1, iTunes for Windows 12.10.5, iCloud for Windows 10.9.3, iCloud for Windows 7.18. Processing maliciously crafted web content may lead to arbitrary code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3897 | 1 Apple | 7 Icloud, Ipad Os, Iphone Os and 4 more | 2024-02-28 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| A type confusion issue was addressed with improved memory handling. This issue is fixed in iOS 13.4 and iPadOS 13.4, tvOS 13.4, watchOS 6.2, Safari 13.1, iTunes for Windows 12.10.5, iCloud for Windows 10.9.3, iCloud for Windows 7.18. A remote attacker may be able to cause arbitrary code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2019-20571 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2024-02-28 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered on Samsung mobile devices with O(8.x) (with TEEGRIS) software. There is type confusion in the WVDRM Trustlet, leading to arbitrary code execution. The Samsung ID is SVE-2019-14885 (September 2019). | |||||
| CVE-2019-20586 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2024-02-28 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered on Samsung mobile devices with O(8.1) and P(9.0) (with TEEGRIS) software. There is type confusion in the FINGERPRINT Trustlet, leading to arbitrary code execution. The Samsung ID is SVE-2019-14864 (August 2019). | |||||
| CVE-2020-6464 | 3 Debian, Google, Opensuse | 3 Debian Linux, Chrome, Leap | 2024-02-28 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Type confusion in Blink in Google Chrome prior to 81.0.4044.138 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10909 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-02-28 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.0.29478. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the AddWatermark command of the communication API. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9942. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10910 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-02-28 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.0.29478. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the RotatePage command of the communication API. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9943. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10913 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2024-02-28 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.0.29478. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the OCRAndExportToExcel command of the communication API. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9946. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10911 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-02-28 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.0.29478. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the GetFieldValue command of the communication API. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9944. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10889 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-02-28 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.0.29478. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the DuplicatePages command of the communication API. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9828. | |||||