Total
980 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-47583 | 1 Mintty Project | 1 Mintty | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Terminal character injection in Mintty before 3.6.3 allows code execution via unescaped output to the terminal. | |||||
| CVE-2022-47052 | 1 Netgear | 2 Ac1200 R6220, Ac1200 R6220 Firmware | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| The web interface of the 'Nighthawk R6220 AC1200 Smart Wi-Fi Router' is vulnerable to a CRLF Injection attack that can be leveraged to perform Reflected XSS and HTML Injection. A malicious unauthenticated attacker can exploit this vulnerability using a specially crafted URL. This affects firmware versions: V1.1.0.112_1.0.1, V1.1.0.114_1.0.1. | |||||
| CVE-2022-47028 | 1 Actionlauncher | 1 Action Launcher | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| An issue discovered in Action Launcher for Android v50.5 allows an attacker to cause a denial of service via arbitary data injection to function insert. | |||||
| CVE-2022-46873 | 1 Mozilla | 1 Firefox | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Because Firefox did not implement the <code>unsafe-hashes</code> CSP directive, an attacker who was able to inject markup into a page otherwise protected by a Content Security Policy may have been able to inject executable script. This would be severely constrained by the specified Content Security Policy of the document. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 108. | |||||
| CVE-2022-46337 | 1 Apache | 1 Derby | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A cleverly devised username might bypass LDAP authentication checks. In LDAP-authenticated Derby installations, this could let an attacker fill up the disk by creating junk Derby databases. In LDAP-authenticated Derby installations, this could also allow the attacker to execute malware which was visible to and executable by the account which booted the Derby server. In LDAP-protected databases which weren't also protected by SQL GRANT/REVOKE authorization, this vulnerability could also let an attacker view and corrupt sensitive data and run sensitive database functions and procedures. Mitigation: Users should upgrade to Java 21 and Derby 10.17.1.0. Alternatively, users who wish to remain on older Java versions should build their own Derby distribution from one of the release families to which the fix was backported: 10.16, 10.15, and 10.14. Those are the releases which correspond, respectively, with Java LTS versions 17, 11, and 8. | |||||
| CVE-2022-46265 | 1 Siemens | 1 Polarion Alm | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Polarion ALM (All versions < V2304.0). The affected application contains a Host header injection vulnerability that could allow an attacker to spoof a Host header information and redirect users to malicious websites. | |||||
| CVE-2022-45910 | 1 Apache | 1 Manifoldcf | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Improper neutralization of special elements used in an LDAP query ('LDAP Injection') vulnerability in ActiveDirectory and Sharepoint ActiveDirectory authority connectors of Apache ManifoldCF allows an attacker to manipulate the LDAP search queries (DoS, additional queries, filter manipulation) during user lookup, if the username or the domain string are passed to the UserACLs servlet without validation. This issue affects Apache ManifoldCF version 2.23 and prior versions. | |||||
| CVE-2022-45801 | 1 Apache | 1 Streampark | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Apache StreamPark 1.0.0 to 2.0.0 have a LDAP injection vulnerability. LDAP Injection is an attack used to exploit web based applications that construct LDAP statements based on user input. When an application fails to properly sanitize user input, it's possible to modify LDAP statements through techniques similar to SQL Injection. LDAP injection attacks could result in the granting of permissions to unauthorized queries, and content modification inside the LDAP tree. This risk may only occur when the user logs in with ldap, and the user name and password login will not be affected, Users of the affected versions should upgrade to Apache StreamPark 2.0.0 or later. | |||||
| CVE-2022-45048 | 1 Apache | 1 Ranger | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 8.4 HIGH |
| Authenticated users with appropriate privileges can create policies having expressions that can exploit code execution vulnerability. This issue affects Apache Ranger: 2.3.0. Users are recommended to update to version 2.4.0. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43756 | 1 Suse | 1 Wrangler | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| A Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection') vulnerability in SUSE Rancher allows remote attackers to cause denial of service by supplying specially crafted git credentials. This issue affects: SUSE Rancher wrangler version 0.7.3 and prior versions; wrangler version 0.8.4 and prior versions; wrangler version 1.0.0 and prior versions. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43562 | 1 Splunk | 2 Splunk, Splunk Cloud Platform | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 3.0 LOW |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 8.1.12, 8.2.9, and 9.0.2, Splunk Enterprise fails to properly validate and escape the Host header, which could let a remote authenticated user conduct various attacks against the system, including cross-site scripting and cache poisoning. | |||||
| CVE-2022-42797 | 1 Apple | 1 Xcode | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| An injection issue was addressed with improved input validation. This issue is fixed in Xcode 14.1. An app may be able to gain root privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2022-42544 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In getView of AddAppNetworksFragment.java, there is a possible way to mislead the user about network add requests due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-13Android ID: A-224545390 | |||||
| CVE-2022-42472 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortios, Fortiproxy | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 4.2 MEDIUM |
| A improper neutralization of crlf sequences in http headers ('http response splitting') in Fortinet FortiOS versions 7.2.0 through 7.2.2, 7.0.0 through 7.0.8, 6.4.0 through 6.4.11, 6.2.0 through 6.2.12, 6.0.0 through 6.0.16, FortiProxy 7.2.0 through 7.2.1, 7.0.0 through 7.0.7, 2.0.0 through 2.0.10, 1.2.0 through 1.2.13, 1.1.0 through 1.1.6 may allow an authenticated and remote attacker to perform an HTTP request splitting attack which gives attackers control of the remaining headers and body of the response. | |||||
| CVE-2022-42471 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiweb | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| An improper neutralization of CRLF sequences in HTTP headers ('HTTP Response Splitting') vulnerability [CWE-113] In FortiWeb version 7.0.0 through 7.0.2, FortiWeb version 6.4.0 through 6.4.2, FortiWeb version 6.3.6 through 6.3.20 may allow an authenticated and remote attacker to inject arbitrary headers. | |||||
| CVE-2022-42468 | 1 Apache | 1 Flume | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Apache Flume versions 1.4.0 through 1.10.1 are vulnerable to a remote code execution (RCE) attack when a configuration uses a JMS Source with an unsafe providerURL. This issue is fixed by limiting JNDI to allow only the use of the java protocol or no protocol. | |||||
| CVE-2022-40958 | 1 Mozilla | 3 Firefox, Firefox Esr, Thunderbird | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| By injecting a cookie with certain special characters, an attacker on a shared subdomain which is not a secure context could set and thus overwrite cookies from a secure context, leading to session fixation and other attacks. This vulnerability affects Firefox ESR < 102.3, Thunderbird < 102.3, and Firefox < 105. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3918 | 1 Apple | 1 Swift Foundation | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| A program using FoundationNetworking in swift-corelibs-foundation is potentially vulnerable to CRLF ( ) injection in URLRequest headers. In this vulnerability, a client can insert one or several CRLF sequences into a URLRequest header value. When that request is sent via URLSession to an HTTP server, the server may interpret the content after the CRLF as extra headers, or even a second request. For example, consider a URLRequest to http://example.com/ with the GET method. Suppose we set the URLRequest header "Foo" to the value "Bar Extra-Header: Added GET /other HTTP/1.1". When this request is sent, it will appear to the server as two requests: GET / HTTP/1.1 Foo: Bar Extra-Header: Added GET /other HTTP/1.1 In this manner, the client is able to inject extra headers and craft an entirely new request to a separate path, despite only making one API call in URLSession. If a developer has total control over the request and its headers, this vulnerability may not pose a threat. However, this vulnerability escalates if un-sanitized user input is placed in header values. If so, a malicious user could inject new headers or requests to an intermediary or backend server. Developers should be especially careful to sanitize user input in this case, or upgrade their version of swift-corelibs-foundation to include the patch below. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3643 | 3 Broadcom, Debian, Linux | 3 Bcm5780, Debian Linux, Linux Kernel | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Guests can trigger NIC interface reset/abort/crash via netback It is possible for a guest to trigger a NIC interface reset/abort/crash in a Linux based network backend by sending certain kinds of packets. It appears to be an (unwritten?) assumption in the rest of the Linux network stack that packet protocol headers are all contained within the linear section of the SKB and some NICs behave badly if this is not the case. This has been reported to occur with Cisco (enic) and Broadcom NetXtrem II BCM5780 (bnx2x) though it may be an issue with other NICs/drivers as well. In case the frontend is sending requests with split headers, netback will forward those violating above mentioned assumption to the networking core, resulting in said misbehavior. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3607 | 1 Octoprint | 1 Octoprint | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 6.0 MEDIUM |
| Failure to Sanitize Special Elements into a Different Plane (Special Element Injection) in GitHub repository octoprint/octoprint prior to 1.8.3. | |||||