Total
980 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-10808 | 1 Anisha | 1 E-health Care System | 2024-11-06 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been found in code-projects E-Health Care System 1.0 and classified as critical. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file Admin/req_detail.php. The manipulation of the argument id leads to sql injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | |||||
| CVE-2024-10807 | 1 Anujkumar | 1 Hospital Management System | 2024-11-06 | 3.3 LOW | 4.8 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability was found in PHPGurukul Hospital Management System 4.0. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file hms/doctor/search.php. The manipulation of the argument searchdata leads to cross site scripting. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | |||||
| CVE-2024-10806 | 1 Anujkumar | 1 Hospital Management System | 2024-11-06 | 3.3 LOW | 4.8 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability was found in PHPGurukul Hospital Management System 4.0. It has been declared as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file betweendates-detailsreports.php. The manipulation of the argument fromdate/todate leads to cross site scripting. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | |||||
| CVE-2024-10791 | 1 Codezips | 1 Hospital Appointment System | 2024-11-06 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Codezips Hospital Appointment System 1.0. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /doctorAction.php. The manipulation of the argument Name leads to sql injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The initial researcher advisory mentions contradicting file and parameter names to be affected. | |||||
| CVE-2024-10768 | 1 Phpgurukul | 1 Online Shopping Portal | 2024-11-06 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in PHPGurukul Online Shopping Portal 2.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /admin/assets/plugins/DataTables/media/unit_testing/templates/two_tables.php. The manipulation of the argument scripts leads to cross site scripting. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | |||||
| CVE-2024-10700 | 1 Anisha | 1 University Event Management System | 2024-11-05 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A vulnerability was found in code-projects University Event Management System 1.0. It has been declared as critical. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file submit.php. The manipulation of the argument name/email/title/Year/gender/fromdate/todate/people leads to sql injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The initial researcher advisory only mentions the parameter "name" to be affected. But it must be assumed that a variety of other parameters is affected too. | |||||
| CVE-2024-10752 | 1 Codezips | 1 Pet Shop Management System | 2024-11-05 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A vulnerability was found in Codezips Pet Shop Management System 1.0. It has been classified as critical. This affects an unknown part of the file /productsadd.php. The manipulation of the argument id/name leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The initial researcher advisory mentions contradicting file names to be affected. | |||||
| CVE-2024-9324 | 1 Intelbras | 1 Incontrol Web | 2024-11-04 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability was found in Intelbras InControl up to 2.21.57. It has been rated as critical. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /v1/operador/ of the component Relatório de Operadores Page. The manipulation of the argument fields leads to code injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. Upgrading to version 2.21.58 is able to address this issue. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The vendor was informed early on 2024-07-19 about this issue. The release of a fixed version 2.21.58 was announced for the end of August 2024 but then was postponed until 2024-09-20. | |||||
| CVE-2024-8309 | 1 Langchain | 1 Langchain | 2024-11-01 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A vulnerability in the GraphCypherQAChain class of langchain-ai/langchain version 0.2.5 allows for SQL injection through prompt injection. This vulnerability can lead to unauthorized data manipulation, data exfiltration, denial of service (DoS) by deleting all data, breaches in multi-tenant security environments, and data integrity issues. Attackers can create, update, or delete nodes and relationships without proper authorization, extract sensitive data, disrupt services, access data across different tenants, and compromise the integrity of the database. | |||||
| CVE-2024-7472 | 1 Lunary | 1 Lunary | 2024-10-31 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| lunary-ai/lunary v1.2.26 contains an email injection vulnerability in the Send email verification API (/v1/users/send-verification) and Sign up API (/auth/signup). An unauthenticated attacker can inject data into outgoing emails by bypassing the extractFirstName function using a different whitespace character (e.g., \xa0). This vulnerability can be exploited to conduct phishing attacks, damage the application's brand, cause legal and compliance issues, and result in financial impact due to unauthorized email usage. | |||||
| CVE-2024-49380 | 2024-10-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Plenti, a static site generator, has an arbitrary file write vulnerability in versions prior to 0.7.2. The `/postLocal` endpoint is vulnerable to an arbitrary file write vulnerability when a plenti user serves their website. This issue may lead to Remote Code Execution. Version 0.7.2 fixes the vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2024-48927 | 1 Umbraco | 1 Umbraco Cms | 2024-10-25 | N/A | 4.6 MEDIUM |
| Umbraco, a free and open source .NET content management system, has a remote code execution issue in versions on the 13.x branch prior to 13.5.2, 10.x prior to 10.8.7, and 8.x prior to 8.18.15. There is a potential risk of code execution for Backoffice users when they “preview” SVG files in full screen mode. Versions 13.5.2, 10.8,7, and 8.18.15 contain a patch for the issue. As a workaround, derver-side file validation is available to strip script tags from file's content during the file upload process. | |||||
| CVE-2024-48918 | 2024-10-18 | N/A | N/A | ||
| RDS Light is a simplified version of the Reflective Dialogue System (RDS), a self-reflecting AI framework. Versions prior to 1.1.0 contain a vulnerability that involves a lack of input validation within the RDS AI framework, specifically within the user input handling code in the main module (`main.py`). This leaves the framework open to injection attacks and potential memory tampering. Any user or external actor providing input to the system could exploit this vulnerability to inject malicious commands, corrupt stored data, or affect API calls. This is particularly critical for users employing RDS AI in production environments where it interacts with sensitive systems, performs dynamic memory caching, or retrieves user-specific data for analysis. Impacted areas include developers using the RDS AI system as a backend for AI-driven applications and systems running RDS AI that may be exposed to untrusted environments or receive unverified user inputs. The vulnerability has been patched in version 1.1.0 of the RDS AI framework. All user inputs are now sanitized and validated against a set of rules designed to mitigate malicious content. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 or higher and ensure all dependencies are updated to their latest versions. For users unable to upgrade to the patched version, a workaround can be implemented. The user implementing the workaround should implement custom validation checks for user inputs to filter out unsafe characters and patterns (e.g., SQL injection attempts, script injections) and limit or remove features that allow user input until the system can be patched. | |||||
| CVE-2024-47764 | 2024-10-07 | N/A | N/A | ||
| cookie is a basic HTTP cookie parser and serializer for HTTP servers. The cookie name could be used to set other fields of the cookie, resulting in an unexpected cookie value. A similar escape can be used for path and domain, which could be abused to alter other fields of the cookie. Upgrade to 0.7.0, which updates the validation for name, path, and domain. | |||||
| CVE-2024-46997 | 1 Dataease | 1 Dataease | 2024-10-07 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| DataEase is an open source data visualization analysis tool. Prior to version 2.10.1, an attacker can achieve remote command execution by adding a carefully constructed h2 data source connection string. The vulnerability has been fixed in v2.10.1. | |||||
| CVE-2024-45302 | 1 Restsharp | 1 Restsharp | 2024-10-01 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| RestSharp is a Simple REST and HTTP API Client for .NET. The second argument to `RestRequest.AddHeader` (the header value) is vulnerable to CRLF injection. The same applies to `RestRequest.AddOrUpdateHeader` and `RestClient.AddDefaultHeader`. The way HTTP headers are added to a request is via the `HttpHeaders.TryAddWithoutValidation` method which does not check for CRLF characters in the header value. This means that any headers from a `RestSharp.RequestHeaders` object are added to the request in such a way that they are vulnerable to CRLF-injection. In general, CRLF-injection into a HTTP header (when using HTTP/1.1) means that one can inject additional HTTP headers or smuggle whole HTTP requests. If an application using the RestSharp library passes a user-controllable value through to a header, then that application becomes vulnerable to CRLF-injection. This is not necessarily a security issue for a command line application like the one above, but if such code were present in a web application then it becomes vulnerable to request splitting (as shown in the PoC) and thus Server Side Request Forgery. Strictly speaking this is a potential vulnerability in applications using RestSharp, not in RestSharp itself, but I would argue that at the very least there needs to be a warning about this behaviour in the RestSharp documentation. RestSharp has addressed this issue in version 112.0.0. All users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2024-43393 | 1 Phoenixcontact | 72 Fl Mguard 2102, Fl Mguard 2102 Firmware, Fl Mguard 2105 and 69 more | 2024-10-01 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| A low privileged remote attacker can perform configuration changes of the firewall services, including packet filter, packet forwarding, network access control or NAT through the FW_INCOMING.FROM_IP FW_INCOMING.IN_IP FW_OUTGOING.FROM_IP FW_OUTGOING.IN_IP FW_RULESETS.FROM_IP FW_RULESETS.IN_IP environment variable which can lead to a DoS. | |||||
| CVE-2024-43392 | 1 Phoenixcontact | 60 Fl Mguard Centerport Vpn-1000, Fl Mguard Centerport Vpn-1000 Firmware, Fl Mguard Core Tx and 57 more | 2024-10-01 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| A low privileged remote attacker can perform configuration changes of the firewall services, including packet filter, packet forwarding, network access control or NAT through the FW_INCOMING.FROM_IP FW_INCOMING.IN_IP FW_OUTGOING.FROM_IP FW_OUTGOING.IN_IP environment variable which can lead to a DoS. | |||||
| CVE-2024-43391 | 1 Phoenixcontact | 72 Fl Mguard 2102, Fl Mguard 2102 Firmware, Fl Mguard 2105 and 69 more | 2024-10-01 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| A low privileged remote attacker can perform configuration changes of the firewall services, including packet filter, packet forwarding, network access control or NAT through the FW_PORTFORWARDING.SRC_IP environment variable which can lead to a DoS. | |||||
| CVE-2024-43390 | 1 Phoenixcontact | 72 Fl Mguard 2102, Fl Mguard 2102 Firmware, Fl Mguard 2105 and 69 more | 2024-10-01 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| A low privileged remote attacker can perform configuration changes of the firewall services, including packet forwarding or NAT through the FW_NAT.IN_IP environment variable which can lead to a DoS. | |||||