Total
6072 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-8458 | 1 Planet | 4 Gs-4210-24p2s, Gs-4210-24p2s Firmware, Gs-4210-24pl4c and 1 more | 2024-10-04 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Certain switch models from PLANET Technology have a web application that is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). An unauthenticated remote attacker can trick a user into visiting a malicious website, allowing the attacker to impersonate the user and perform actions on their behalf, such as creating accounts. | |||||
| CVE-2023-7273 | 2024-10-04 | N/A | 6.8 MEDIUM | ||
| Cross site request forgery in Kiteworks OwnCloud allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge requests. If a request has no Authorization header, it is created with an empty string as value by a rewrite rule. The CSRF check is done by comparing the header value to null, meaning that the existing CSRF check is bypassed in this case. An attacker can, for example, create a new administrator account if the request is executed in the browser of an authenticated victim. | |||||
| CVE-2024-41987 | 2024-10-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| The TEM Opera Plus FM Family Transmitter application interface allows users to perform certain actions via HTTP requests without performing any validity checks to verify the requests. This can be exploited to perform certain actions with administrative privileges if a logged-in user visits a malicious web site. | |||||
| CVE-2024-42504 | 2024-10-04 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| A security vulnerability in HPE IceWall Agent products could be exploited remotely to cause a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the login flow. | |||||
| CVE-2024-45372 | 1 Planex | 2 Mzk-dp300n, Mzk-dp300n Firmware | 2024-10-03 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| MZK-DP300N firmware versions 1.04 and earlier contains a cross-site request forger vulnerability. Viewing a malicious page while logging in to the web management page of the affected product may lead the user to perform unintended operations such as changing the login password, etc. | |||||
| CVE-2024-20414 | 1 Cisco | 2 Ios, Ios Xe | 2024-10-02 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the web UI feature of Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system through the web UI. This vulnerability is due to incorrectly accepting configuration changes through the HTTP GET method. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a currently authenticated administrator to follow a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to change the configuration of the affected device. | |||||
| CVE-2024-8476 | 1 Wpplugin | 1 Easy Paypal Events | 2024-10-02 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| The Easy PayPal Events plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wpeevent_plugin_buttons() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary posts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2024-47305 | 1 Dineshkarki | 1 Use Any Font | 2024-10-02 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Dnesscarkey Use Any Font allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Use Any Font: from n/a through 6.3.08. | |||||
| CVE-2024-47082 | 1 Strawberryrocks | 1 Strawberry | 2024-10-01 | N/A | 8.0 HIGH |
| Strawberry GraphQL is a library for creating GraphQL APIs. Prior to version 0.243.0, multipart file upload support as defined in the GraphQL multipart request specification was enabled by default in all Strawberry HTTP view integrations. This made all Strawberry HTTP view integrations vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks if users did not explicitly enable CSRF preventing security mechanism for their servers. Additionally, the Django HTTP view integration, in particular, had an exemption for Django's built-in CSRF protection (i.e., the `CsrfViewMiddleware` middleware) by default. In affect, all Strawberry integrations were vulnerable to CSRF attacks by default. Version `v0.243.0` is the first `strawberry-graphql` including a patch. | |||||
| CVE-2024-47315 | 1 Givewp | 1 Givewp | 2024-09-30 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in GiveWP.This issue affects GiveWP: from n/a through 3.15.1. | |||||
| CVE-2024-7862 | 1 Kimhuebel | 1 Blogintroduction-wordpress-plugin | 2024-09-30 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The blogintroduction-wordpress-plugin WordPress plugin through 0.3.0 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack | |||||
| CVE-2024-3083 | 1 Proges | 2 Sensor Net Connect Firmware V2, Sensor Net Connect V2 | 2024-09-30 | N/A | 8.3 HIGH |
| A “CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)” can be exploited by remote attackers to perform state-changing operations with administrative privileges by luring authenticated victims into visiting a malicious web page. | |||||
| CVE-2024-8044 | 1 Rubayathasan | 1 Infolinks Ad Wrap | 2024-09-30 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The infolinks Ad Wrap WordPress plugin through 1.0.2 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack | |||||
| CVE-2024-45983 | 2024-09-30 | N/A | 6.3 MEDIUM | ||
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in kishan0725's Hospital Management System version 6.3.5. The vulnerability allows an attacker to craft a malicious HTML form that submits a request to delete a doctor record. By enticing an authenticated admin user to visit the specially crafted web page, the attacker can leverage the victim's browser to make unauthorized requests to the vulnerable endpoint, effectively allowing the attacker to perform actions on behalf of the admin without their consent. | |||||
| CVE-2024-7863 | 1 Pixeljar | 1 Favicon Generator | 2024-09-27 | N/A | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| The Favicon Generator (CLOSED) WordPress plugin before 2.1 does not validate files to be uploaded and does not have CSRF checks, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin upload arbitrary files such as PHP on the server | |||||
| CVE-2024-7864 | 1 Pixeljar | 1 Favicon Generator | 2024-09-27 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The Favicon Generator (CLOSED) WordPress plugin before 2.1 does not have CSRF and path validation in the output_sub_admin_page_0() function, allowing attackers to make logged in admins delete arbitrary files on the server | |||||
| CVE-2024-8047 | 1 Gowildchild | 1 Visual Sound | 2024-09-27 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The Visual Sound (old) WordPress plugin through 1.06 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack | |||||
| CVE-2024-8490 | 1 Wp-property-hive | 1 Propertyhive | 2024-09-27 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The PropertyHive plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.19. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'save_account_details' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to edit the name, email address, and password of an administrator account via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2024-7817 | 1 Michalaugustyniak | 1 Misiek Photo Album | 2024-09-27 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The Misiek Photo Album WordPress plugin through 1.4.3 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users delete arbitrary albums via a CSRF attack | |||||
| CVE-2024-8043 | 1 Seanschulte | 1 Vikinghammer Tweet | 2024-09-27 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| The Vikinghammer Tweet WordPress plugin through 0.2.4 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack. | |||||