Total
9 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2010-4354 | 1 Cisco | 9 Asa 5500, Pix 500, Vpn 3000 Concentrator and 6 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The remote-access IPSec VPN implementation on Cisco Adaptive Security Appliances (ASA) 5500 series devices, PIX Security Appliances 500 series devices, and VPN Concentrators 3000 series devices responds to an Aggressive Mode IKE Phase I message only when the group name is configured on the device, which allows remote attackers to enumerate valid group names via a series of IKE negotiation attempts, aka Bug ID CSCtj96108, a different vulnerability than CVE-2005-2025. | |||||
| CVE-2006-3906 | 1 Cisco | 21 Adaptive Security Appliance Software, Ios, Pix Asa Ids and 18 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Internet Key Exchange (IKE) version 1 protocol, as implemented on Cisco IOS, VPN 3000 Concentrators, and PIX firewalls, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (resource exhaustion) via a flood of IKE Phase-1 packets that exceed the session expiration rate. NOTE: it has been argued that this is due to a design weakness of the IKE version 1 protocol, in which case other vendors and implementations would also be affected. | |||||
| CVE-2005-4499 | 1 Cisco | 21 Adaptive Security Appliance Software, Pix Asa Ids, Pix Firewall and 18 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| The Downloadable RADIUS ACLs feature in Cisco PIX and VPN 3000 concentrators, when creating an ACL on the Cisco Secure Access Control Server (CS ACS), generates a random internal name for an ACL that is also used as a hidden user name and password, which allows remote attackers to gain privileges by sniffing the username from the cleartext portion of a RADIUS session, then using the password to log in to another device that uses CS ACS. | |||||
| CVE-2005-2025 | 1 Cisco | 8 Vpn 3000 Concentrator, Vpn 3000 Concentrator Series Software, Vpn 3005 Concentrator Software and 5 more | 2024-11-20 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cisco VPN 3000 Concentrator before 4.1.7.F allows remote attackers to determine valid groupnames by sending an IKE Aggressive Mode packet with the groupname in the ID field, which generates a response if the groupname is valid, but does not generate a response for an invalid groupname. | |||||
| CVE-2005-0943 | 1 Cisco | 8 Vpn 3000 Concentrator Series Software, Vpn 3002 Hardware Client, Vpn 3005 Concentrator Software and 5 more | 2024-11-20 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cisco VPN 3000 series Concentrator running firmware 4.1.7.A and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload or drop user connection) via a crafted HTTPS packet. | |||||
| CVE-2003-0260 | 1 Cisco | 6 Vpn 3000 Concentrator Series Software, Vpn 3002 Hardware Client, Vpn 3015 Concentrator and 3 more | 2024-11-20 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cisco VPN 3000 series concentrators and Cisco VPN 3002 Hardware Client 2.x.x through 3.6.7A allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (slowdown and possibly reload) via a flood of malformed ICMP packets. | |||||
| CVE-2003-0259 | 1 Cisco | 6 Vpn 3000 Concentrator Series Software, Vpn 3002 Hardware Client, Vpn 3015 Concentrator and 3 more | 2024-11-20 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cisco VPN 3000 series concentrators and Cisco VPN 3002 Hardware Client 2.x.x through 3.6.7 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (reload) via a malformed SSH initialization packet. | |||||
| CVE-2003-0258 | 1 Cisco | 7 Vpn 3000 Concentrator Series Software, Vpn 3002 Hardware Client, Vpn 3005 Concentrator Software and 4 more | 2024-11-20 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Cisco VPN 3000 series concentrators and Cisco VPN 3002 Hardware Client 3.5.x through 4.0.REL, when enabling IPSec over TCP for a port on the concentrator, allow remote attackers to reach the private network without authentication. | |||||
| CVE-2001-0427 | 1 Cisco | 6 Vpn 3000 Concentrator, Vpn 3005 Concentrator, Vpn 3015 Concentrator and 3 more | 2024-11-20 | 7.1 HIGH | N/A |
| Cisco VPN 3000 series concentrators before 2.5.2(F) allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a flood of invalid login requests to (1) the SSL service, or (2) the telnet service, which do not properly disconnect the user after several failed login attempts. | |||||