Total
24 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-3099 | 1 Lfprojects | 1 Mlflow | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in mlflow/mlflow version 2.11.1 allows attackers to create multiple models with the same name by exploiting URL encoding. This flaw can lead to Denial of Service (DoS) as an authenticated user might not be able to use the intended model, as it will open a different model each time. Additionally, an attacker can exploit this vulnerability to perform data model poisoning by creating a model with the same name, potentially causing an authenticated user to become a victim by using the poisoned model. The issue stems from inadequate validation of model names, allowing for the creation of models with URL-encoded names that are treated as distinct from their URL-decoded counterparts. | |||||
| CVE-2024-2928 | 1 Lfprojects | 1 Mlflow | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A Local File Inclusion (LFI) vulnerability was identified in mlflow/mlflow, specifically in version 2.9.2, which was fixed in version 2.11.3. This vulnerability arises from the application's failure to properly validate URI fragments for directory traversal sequences such as '../'. An attacker can exploit this flaw by manipulating the fragment part of the URI to read arbitrary files on the local file system, including sensitive files like '/etc/passwd'. The vulnerability is a bypass to a previous patch that only addressed similar manipulation within the URI's query string, highlighting the need for comprehensive validation of all parts of a URI to prevent LFI attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2024-0520 | 1 Lfprojects | 1 Mlflow | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in mlflow/mlflow version 8.2.1 allows for remote code execution due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('Command Injection') within the `mlflow.data.http_dataset_source.py` module. Specifically, when loading a dataset from a source URL with an HTTP scheme, the filename extracted from the `Content-Disposition` header or the URL path is used to generate the final file path without proper sanitization. This flaw enables an attacker to control the file path fully by utilizing path traversal or absolute path techniques, such as '../../tmp/poc.txt' or '/tmp/poc.txt', leading to arbitrary file write. Exploiting this vulnerability could allow a malicious user to execute commands on the vulnerable machine, potentially gaining access to data and model information. The issue is fixed in version 2.9.0. | |||||
| CVE-2023-6977 | 1 Lfprojects | 1 Mlflow | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| This vulnerability enables malicious users to read sensitive files on the server. | |||||
| CVE-2023-6976 | 1 Lfprojects | 1 Mlflow | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability is capable of writing arbitrary files into arbitrary locations on the remote filesystem in the context of the server process. | |||||
| CVE-2023-6975 | 1 Lfprojects | 1 Mlflow | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A malicious user could use this issue to get command execution on the vulnerable machine and get access to data & models information. | |||||
| CVE-2023-6974 | 1 Lfprojects | 1 Mlflow | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A malicious user could use this issue to access internal HTTP(s) servers and in the worst case (ie: aws instance) it could be abuse to get a remote code execution on the victim machine. | |||||
| CVE-2023-6940 | 1 Lfprojects | 1 Mlflow | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| with only one user interaction(download a malicious config), attackers can gain full command execution on the victim system. | |||||
| CVE-2023-6909 | 1 Lfprojects | 1 Mlflow | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Path Traversal: '\..\filename' in GitHub repository mlflow/mlflow prior to 2.9.2. | |||||
| CVE-2023-6831 | 1 Lfprojects | 1 Mlflow | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| Path Traversal: '\..\filename' in GitHub repository mlflow/mlflow prior to 2.9.2. | |||||
| CVE-2023-6753 | 2 Lfprojects, Microsoft | 2 Mlflow, Windows | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Path Traversal in GitHub repository mlflow/mlflow prior to 2.9.2. | |||||
| CVE-2023-6709 | 1 Lfprojects | 1 Mlflow | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Improper Neutralization of Special Elements Used in a Template Engine in GitHub repository mlflow/mlflow prior to 2.9.2. | |||||
| CVE-2023-6018 | 1 Lfprojects | 1 Mlflow | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An attacker can overwrite any file on the server hosting MLflow without any authentication. | |||||
| CVE-2023-6015 | 1 Lfprojects | 1 Mlflow | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| MLflow allowed arbitrary files to be PUT onto the server. | |||||
| CVE-2023-6014 | 1 Lfprojects | 1 Mlflow | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An attacker is able to arbitrarily create an account in MLflow bypassing any authentication requirment. | |||||
| CVE-2023-4033 | 1 Lfprojects | 1 Mlflow | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| OS Command Injection in GitHub repository mlflow/mlflow prior to 2.6.0. | |||||
| CVE-2023-43472 | 1 Lfprojects | 1 Mlflow | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue in MLFlow versions 2.8.1 and before allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via a crafted request to REST API. | |||||
| CVE-2023-3765 | 2 Lfprojects, Microsoft | 2 Mlflow, Windows | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 10.0 CRITICAL |
| Absolute Path Traversal in GitHub repository mlflow/mlflow prior to 2.5.0. | |||||
| CVE-2023-30172 | 1 Lfprojects | 1 Mlflow | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A directory traversal vulnerability in the /get-artifact API method of the mlflow platform up to v2.0.1 allows attackers to read arbitrary files on the server via the path parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2023-2780 | 1 Lfprojects | 1 Mlflow | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Path Traversal: '\..\filename' in GitHub repository mlflow/mlflow prior to 2.3.1. | |||||