Total
7 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-26146 | 3 Arista, Samsung, Siemens | 38 C-100, C-100 Firmware, C-110 and 35 more | 2024-11-21 | 2.9 LOW | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered on Samsung Galaxy S3 i9305 4.4.4 devices. The WPA, WPA2, and WPA3 implementations reassemble fragments with non-consecutive packet numbers. An adversary can abuse this to exfiltrate selected fragments. This vulnerability is exploitable when another device sends fragmented frames and the WEP, CCMP, or GCMP data-confidentiality protocol is used. Note that WEP is vulnerable to this attack by design. | |||||
| CVE-2020-26144 | 3 Arista, Samsung, Siemens | 36 C-100, C-100 Firmware, C-110 and 33 more | 2024-11-21 | 3.3 LOW | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered on Samsung Galaxy S3 i9305 4.4.4 devices. The WEP, WPA, WPA2, and WPA3 implementations accept plaintext A-MSDU frames as long as the first 8 bytes correspond to a valid RFC1042 (i.e., LLC/SNAP) header for EAPOL. An adversary can abuse this to inject arbitrary network packets independent of the network configuration. | |||||
| CVE-2020-26140 | 5 Alfa, Arista, Cisco and 2 more | 388 Awus036h, Awus036h Firmware, C-100 and 385 more | 2024-11-21 | 3.3 LOW | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in the ALFA Windows 10 driver 6.1316.1209 for AWUS036H. The WEP, WPA, WPA2, and WPA3 implementations accept plaintext frames in a protected Wi-Fi network. An adversary can abuse this to inject arbitrary data frames independent of the network configuration. | |||||
| CVE-2020-26139 | 5 Arista, Cisco, Debian and 2 more | 330 C-100, C-100 Firmware, C-110 and 327 more | 2024-11-21 | 2.9 LOW | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in the kernel in NetBSD 7.1. An Access Point (AP) forwards EAPOL frames to other clients even though the sender has not yet successfully authenticated to the AP. This might be abused in projected Wi-Fi networks to launch denial-of-service attacks against connected clients and makes it easier to exploit other vulnerabilities in connected clients. | |||||
| CVE-2020-24588 | 8 Arista, Cisco, Debian and 5 more | 350 C-100, C-100 Firmware, C-110 and 347 more | 2024-11-21 | 2.9 LOW | 3.5 LOW |
| The 802.11 standard that underpins Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA, WPA2, and WPA3) and Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) doesn't require that the A-MSDU flag in the plaintext QoS header field is authenticated. Against devices that support receiving non-SSP A-MSDU frames (which is mandatory as part of 802.11n), an adversary can abuse this to inject arbitrary network packets. | |||||
| CVE-2020-24587 | 6 Arista, Cisco, Debian and 3 more | 332 C-100, C-100 Firmware, C-110 and 329 more | 2024-11-21 | 1.8 LOW | 2.6 LOW |
| The 802.11 standard that underpins Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA, WPA2, and WPA3) and Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) doesn't require that all fragments of a frame are encrypted under the same key. An adversary can abuse this to decrypt selected fragments when another device sends fragmented frames and the WEP, CCMP, or GCMP encryption key is periodically renewed. | |||||
| CVE-2020-24586 | 5 Arista, Debian, Ieee and 2 more | 44 C-200, C-200 Firmware, C-230 and 41 more | 2024-11-21 | 2.9 LOW | 3.5 LOW |
| The 802.11 standard that underpins Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA, WPA2, and WPA3) and Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) doesn't require that received fragments be cleared from memory after (re)connecting to a network. Under the right circumstances, when another device sends fragmented frames encrypted using WEP, CCMP, or GCMP, this can be abused to inject arbitrary network packets and/or exfiltrate user data. | |||||