Total
101 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-4292 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.5 could allow a remote attacker to upload arbitrary files, which could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code on the vulnerable web server. IBM X-Force ID: 160698. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1891 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2024-11-21 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Security Guardium 10 and 10.5 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 152082. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1889 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2024-11-21 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 and 10.5 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 152080. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1818 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| IBM Security Guardium 10 and 10.5 contains hard-coded credentials, such as a password or cryptographic key, which it uses for its own inbound authentication, outbound communication to external components, or encryption of internal data. IBM X-Force ID: 150022. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1817 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| IBM Security Guardium 10 and 10.5 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 150021. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1509 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2024-11-21 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 3.7 LOW |
| IBM Security Guardium EcoSystem 10.5 does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate.This weakness might allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by using a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack. The software might connect to a malicious host while believing it is a trusted host, or the software might be deceived into accepting spoofed data that appears to originate from a trusted host. IBM X-Force ID: 141417. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1501 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.5, 10.6, and 11.0 could allow an unauthorized user to obtain sensitive information due to missing security controls. IBM X-Force ID: 141226. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1498 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2024-11-21 | 2.1 LOW | 6.2 MEDIUM |
| IBM Security Guardium EcoSystem 10.5 stores user credentials in plain in clear text which can be read by a local user. IBM X-Force ID: 141223. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1757 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 is vulnerable to SQL injection. A remote attacker could send specially-crafted SQL statements, which could allow the attacker to view, add, modify or delete information in the back-end database. IBM X-Force ID: 135858. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1600 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2024-11-21 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 Database Activity Monitor is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 132613. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1598 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 Database Activity Monitor uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 132611. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1597 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0, 10.0.1, 10.1, 10.1.2, 10.1.3, 10.1.4, and 10.5 Database Activity Monitor does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts. IBM X-Force ID: 132610. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1596 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2024-11-21 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 Database Activity Monitor could allow a local attacker to obtain highly sensitive information via unspecified vectors. IBM X-Force ID: 132550. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1595 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2024-11-21 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 Database Activity Monitor could allow a local attacker to obtain highly sensitive information via unspecified vectors. IBM X-Force ID: 132549. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1272 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 3.7 LOW |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 and 10.5 stores sensitive information in URL parameters. This may lead to information disclosure if unauthorized parties have access to the URLs via server logs, referrer header or browser history. IBM X-Force ID: 124747. IBM X-Force ID: 124747. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1271 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 9.0, 9.1, and 9.5 supports interaction between multiple actors and allows those actors to negotiate which algorithm should be used as a protection mechanism such as encryption or authentication, but it does not select the strongest algorithm that is available to both parties. IBM X-Force ID: 124746. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1270 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2024-11-21 | 2.1 LOW | 3.3 LOW |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 does not renew a session variable after a successful authentication which could lead to session fixation/hijacking vulnerability. This could force a user to utilize a cookie that may be known to an attacker. IBM X-Force ID: 124745. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1269 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 and 10.1 is vulnerable to SQL injection. A remote attacker could send specially-crafted SQL statements, which could allow the attacker to view, add, modify or delete information in the back-end database. IBM X-force ID: 124744 | |||||
| CVE-2017-1268 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2024-11-21 | 2.1 LOW | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| IBM Security Guardium 10 and 10.5 uses a one-way cryptographic hash against an input that should not be reversible, such as a password, but the software does not also use a salt as part of the input. IBM X-Force ID: 124743. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1267 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 and 10.1 processes patches, image backups and other updates without sufficiently verifying the origin and integrity of the code. IBM X-Force ID: 124742. | |||||