Filtered by vendor Pulsesecure
Subscribe
Total
97 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-15408 | 1 Pulsesecure | 2 Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Secure Desktop Client | 2024-11-21 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 3.7 LOW |
| An issue was discovered in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure before 9.1R8. An authenticated attacker can access the admin page console via the end-user web interface because of a rewrite. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15352 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 4 Connect Secure, Policy Secure, Pulse Connect Secure and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| An XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) before 9.1R9 and Pulse Policy Secure (PPS) before 9.1R9 allows remote authenticated admins to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via a crafted DTD in an XML request. | |||||
| CVE-2020-13162 | 1 Pulsesecure | 2 Pulse Secure Desktop Client, Pulse Secure Installer Service | 2024-11-21 | 6.9 MEDIUM | 7.0 HIGH |
| A time-of-check time-of-use vulnerability in PulseSecureService.exe in Pulse Secure Client versions prior to 9.1.6 down to 5.3 R70 for Windows (which runs as NT AUTHORITY/SYSTEM) allows unprivileged users to run a Microsoft Installer executable with elevated privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2020-12880 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 4 Connect Secure, Policy Secure, Pulse Connect Secure and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in Pulse Policy Secure (PPS) and Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) Virtual Appliance before 9.1R8. By manipulating a certain kernel boot parameter, it can be tricked into dropping into a root shell in a pre-install phase where the entire source code of the appliance is available and can be retrieved. (The source code is otherwise inaccessible because the appliance has its hard disks encrypted, and no root shell is available during normal operation.) | |||||
| CVE-2020-11582 | 4 Apple, Linux, Oracle and 1 more | 5 Macos, Linux Kernel, Solaris and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | 3.3 LOW | 8.8 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) through 2020-04-06. The applet in tncc.jar, executed on macOS, Linux, and Solaris clients when a Host Checker policy is enforced, launches a TCP server that accepts local connections on a random port. This can be reached by local HTTP clients, because up to 25 invalid lines are ignored, and because DNS rebinding can occur. (This server accepts, for example, a setcookie command that might be relevant to CVE-2020-11581 exploitation.) | |||||
| CVE-2020-11581 | 4 Apple, Linux, Oracle and 1 more | 5 Macos, Linux Kernel, Solaris and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.1 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) through 2020-04-06. The applet in tncc.jar, executed on macOS, Linux, and Solaris clients when a Host Checker policy is enforced, allows a man-in-the-middle attacker to perform OS command injection attacks (against a client) via shell metacharacters to the doCustomRemediateInstructions method, because Runtime.getRuntime().exec() is used. | |||||
| CVE-2020-11580 | 4 Apple, Linux, Oracle and 1 more | 5 Macos, Linux Kernel, Solaris and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) through 2020-04-06. The applet in tncc.jar, executed on macOS, Linux, and Solaris clients when a Host Checker policy is enforced, accepts an arbitrary SSL certificate. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11543 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 3 Connect Secure, Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| XSS exists in the admin web console in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) 9.0RX before 9.0R3.4, 8.3RX before 8.3R7.1, and 8.1RX before 8.1R15.1 and Pulse Policy Secure 9.0RX before 9.0R3.2, 5.4RX before 5.4R7.1, and 5.2RX before 5.2R12.1. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11542 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 3 Connect Secure, Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| In Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.4, 8.3RX before 8.3R7.1, 8.2RX before 8.2R12.1, and 8.1RX before 8.1R15.1 and Pulse Policy Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.2, 5.4RX before 5.4R7.1, 5.3RX before 5.3R12.1, 5.2RX before 5.2R12.1, and 5.1RX before 5.1R15.1, an authenticated attacker (via the admin web interface) can send a specially crafted message resulting in a stack buffer overflow. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11541 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 2 Connect Secure, Pulse Connect Secure | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| In Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.4, 8.3RX before 8.3R7.1, and 8.2RX before 8.2R12.1, users using SAML authentication with the Reuse Existing NC (Pulse) Session option may see authentication leaks. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11540 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 3 Connect Secure, Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.4 and 8.3RX before 8.3R7.1 and Pulse Policy Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.2 and 5.4RX before 5.4R7.1, an unauthenticated, remote attacker can conduct a session hijacking attack. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11539 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 3 Connect Secure, Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| In Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.4, 8.3RX before 8.3R7.1, 8.2RX before 8.2R12.1, and 8.1RX before 8.1R15.1 and Pulse Policy Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.2, 5.4RX before 5.4R7.1, 5.3RX before 5.3R12.1, 5.2RX before 5.2R12.1, and 5.1RX before 5.1R15.1, the admin web interface allows an authenticated attacker to inject and execute commands. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11509 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 3 Connect Secure, Policy Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| In Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) before 8.1R15.1, 8.2 before 8.2R12.1, 8.3 before 8.3R7.1, and 9.0 before 9.0R3.4 and Pulse Policy Secure (PPS) before 5.1R15.1, 5.2 before 5.2R12.1, 5.3 before 5.3R15.1, 5.4 before 5.4R7.1, and 9.0 before 9.0R3.2, an authenticated attacker (via the admin web interface) can exploit Incorrect Access Control to execute arbitrary code on the appliance. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11508 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 2 Connect Secure, Pulse Connect Secure | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| In Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) before 8.1R15.1, 8.2 before 8.2R12.1, 8.3 before 8.3R7.1, and 9.0 before 9.0R3.4, an authenticated attacker (via the admin web interface) can exploit Directory Traversal to execute arbitrary code on the appliance. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11478 | 6 Canonical, F5, Ivanti and 3 more | 24 Ubuntu Linux, Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager and 21 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Jonathan Looney discovered that the TCP retransmission queue implementation in tcp_fragment in the Linux kernel could be fragmented when handling certain TCP Selective Acknowledgment (SACK) sequences. A remote attacker could use this to cause a denial of service. This has been fixed in stable kernel releases 4.4.182, 4.9.182, 4.14.127, 4.19.52, 5.1.11, and is fixed in commit f070ef2ac66716357066b683fb0baf55f8191a2e. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11477 | 6 Canonical, F5, Ivanti and 3 more | 24 Ubuntu Linux, Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager and 21 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| Jonathan Looney discovered that the TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->tcp_gso_segs value was subject to an integer overflow in the Linux kernel when handling TCP Selective Acknowledgments (SACKs). A remote attacker could use this to cause a denial of service. This has been fixed in stable kernel releases 4.4.182, 4.9.182, 4.14.127, 4.19.52, 5.1.11, and is fixed in commit 3b4929f65b0d8249f19a50245cd88ed1a2f78cff. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11213 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 3 Connect Secure, Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Secure Desktop Client | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| In Pulse Secure Pulse Desktop Client and Network Connect, an attacker could access session tokens to replay and spoof sessions, and as a result, gain unauthorized access as an end user, a related issue to CVE-2019-1573. (The endpoint would need to be already compromised for exploitation to succeed.) This affects Pulse Desktop Client 5.x before Secure Desktop 5.3R7 and Pulse Desktop Client 9.x before Secure Desktop 9.0R3. It also affects (for Network Connect customers) Pulse Connect Secure 8.1 before 8.1R14, 8.3 before 8.3R7, and 9.0 before 9.0R3. | |||||
| CVE-2018-9849 | 1 Pulsesecure | 1 Pulse Connect Secure | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure 8.1.x before 8.1R14, 8.2.x before 8.2R11, and 8.3.x before 8.3R5 do not properly process nested XML entities, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption and memory errors) via a crafted XML document. | |||||
| CVE-2018-7572 | 1 Pulsesecure | 1 Pulse Secure Desktop | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| Pulse Secure Client 9.0R1 and 5.3RX before 5.3R5, when configured to authenticate VPN users during Windows Logon, can allow attackers to bypass Windows authentication and execute commands on the system with the privileges of Pulse Secure Client. The attacker must interrupt the client's network connectivity, and trigger a connection to a crafted proxy server with an invalid SSL certificate that allows certification-manager access, leading to the ability to browse local files and execute local programs. | |||||
| CVE-2018-6374 | 1 Pulsesecure | 1 Desktop Linux Client | 2024-11-21 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The GUI component (aka PulseUI) in Pulse Secure Desktop Linux clients before PULSE5.2R9.2 and 5.3.x before PULSE5.3R4.2 does not perform strict SSL Certificate Validation. This can lead to the manipulation of the Pulse Connection set. | |||||