Total
62 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2018-13368 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlient | 2024-11-21 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| A local privilege escalation in Fortinet FortiClient for Windows 6.0.4 and earlier allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via the command injection. | |||||
| CVE-2017-7344 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlient | 2024-11-21 | 7.6 HIGH | 8.1 HIGH |
| A privilege escalation in Fortinet FortiClient Windows 5.4.3 and earlier as well as 5.6.0 allows attacker to gain privilege via exploiting the Windows "security alert" dialog thereby popping up when the "VPN before logon" feature is enabled and an untrusted certificate chain. | |||||
| CVE-2017-17543 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Forticlient, Forticlient Sslvpn Client | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Users' VPN authentication credentials are unsafely encrypted in Fortinet FortiClient for Windows 5.6.0 and below versions, FortiClient for Mac OSX 5.6.0 and below versions and FortiClient SSLVPN Client for Linux 4.4.2335 and below versions, due to the use of a static encryption key and weak encryption algorithms. | |||||
| CVE-2017-14184 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Forticlient, Forticlient Sslvpn Client | 2024-11-21 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| An Information Disclosure vulnerability in Fortinet FortiClient for Windows 5.6.0 and below versions, FortiClient for Mac OSX 5.6.0 and below versions and FortiClient SSLVPN Client for Linux 4.4.2334 and below versions allows regular users to see each other's VPN authentication credentials due to improperly secured storage locations. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8493 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlient | 2024-11-21 | 9.0 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| In FortiClientWindows 5.4.1 and 5.4.2, an attacker may escalate privilege via a FortiClientNamedPipe vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2015-7362 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlient | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Fortinet FortiClient Linux SSLVPN before build 2313, when installed on Linux in a home directory that is world readable and executable, allows local users to gain privileges via the helper/subroc setuid program. | |||||
| CVE-2015-5737 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlient | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | N/A |
| The (1) mdare64_48.sys, (2) mdare32_48.sys, (3) mdare32_52.sys, (4) mdare64_52.sys, and (5) Fortishield.sys drivers in Fortinet FortiClient before 5.2.4 do not properly restrict access to the API for management of processes and the Windows registry, which allows local users to obtain a privileged handle to a PID and possibly have unspecified other impact, as demonstrated by a 0x2220c8 ioctl call. | |||||
| CVE-2015-5736 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlient | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | N/A |
| The Fortishield.sys driver in Fortinet FortiClient before 5.2.4 allows local users to execute arbitrary code with kernel privileges by setting the callback function in a (1) 0x220024 or (2) 0x220028 ioctl call. | |||||
| CVE-2015-5735 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlient | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | N/A |
| The (1) mdare64_48.sys, (2) mdare32_48.sys, (3) mdare32_52.sys, and (4) mdare64_52.sys drivers in Fortinet FortiClient before 5.2.4 allow local users to write to arbitrary memory locations via a 0x226108 ioctl call. | |||||
| CVE-2015-4077 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlient | 2024-11-21 | 2.1 LOW | N/A |
| The (1) mdare64_48.sys, (2) mdare32_48.sys, (3) mdare32_52.sys, and (4) mdare64_52.sys drivers in Fortinet FortiClient before 5.2.4 allow local users to read arbitrary kernel memory via a 0x22608C ioctl call. | |||||
| CVE-2015-1570 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlient | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The Endpoint Control protocol implementation in Fortinet FortiClient 5.2.3.091 for Android and 5.2.028 for iOS does not validate certificates, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers via a crafted certificate. | |||||
| CVE-2015-1569 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlient | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Fortinet FortiClient 5.2.028 for iOS does not validate certificates, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL VPN servers via a crafted certificate. | |||||
| CVE-2015-1453 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlient | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The qm class in Fortinet FortiClient 5.2.3.091 for Android uses a hardcoded encryption key of FoRtInEt!AnDrOiD, which makes it easier for attackers to obtain passwords and possibly other sensitive data by leveraging the key to decrypt data in the Shared Preferences. | |||||
| CVE-2013-4669 | 5 Apple, Fortinet, Google and 2 more | 7 Mac Os X, Forticlient, Forticlient Lite and 4 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.4 MEDIUM | N/A |
| FortiClient before 4.3.5.472 on Windows, before 4.0.3.134 on Mac OS X, and before 4.0 on Android; FortiClient Lite before 4.3.4.461 on Windows; FortiClient Lite 2.0 through 2.0.0223 on Android; and FortiClient SSL VPN before 4.0.2258 on Linux proceed with an SSL session after determining that the server's X.509 certificate is invalid, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain sensitive information by leveraging a password transmission that occurs before the user warning about the certificate problem. | |||||
| CVE-2009-1262 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlient | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | N/A |
| Format string vulnerability in Fortinet FortiClient 3.0.614, and possibly earlier, allows local users to execute arbitrary code via format string specifiers in the VPN connection name. | |||||
| CVE-2005-4570 | 1 Fortinet | 3 Forticlient, Fortimanager, Fortios | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 HIGH | N/A |
| The Internet Key Exchange version 1 (IKEv1) implementations in Fortinet FortiOS 2.50, 2.80 and 3.0, FortiClient 2.0,; and FortiManager 2.80 and 3.0 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (termination of a process that is automatically restarted) via IKE packets with invalid values of certain IPSec attributes, as demonstrated by the PROTOS ISAKMP Test Suite for IKEv1. NOTE: due to the lack of details in the vendor advisory, it is unclear which of CVE-2005-3666, CVE-2005-3667, and/or CVE-2005-3668 this issue applies to. | |||||
| CVE-2024-40592 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlient | 2024-11-14 | N/A | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| An improper verification of cryptographic signature vulnerability [CWE-347] in FortiClient MacOS version 7.4.0, version 7.2.4 and below, version 7.0.10 and below, version 6.4.10 and below may allow a local authenticated attacker to swap the installer with a malicious package via a race condition during the installation process. | |||||
| CVE-2024-36513 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlient | 2024-11-14 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| A privilege context switching error vulnerability [CWE-270] in FortiClient Windows version 7.2.4 and below, version 7.0.12 and below, 6.4 all versions may allow an authenticated user to escalate their privileges via lua auto patch scripts. | |||||
| CVE-2024-36507 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlient | 2024-11-14 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| A untrusted search path in Fortinet FortiClientWindows versions 7.4.0, versions 7.2.4 through 7.2.0, versions 7.0.12 through 7.0.0 allows an attacker to run arbitrary code via DLL hijacking and social engineering. | |||||
| CVE-2022-45856 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlient | 2024-09-26 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| An improper certificate validation vulnerability [CWE-295] in FortiClientWindows 6.4 all versions, 7.0.0 through 7.0.7, FortiClientMac 6.4 all versions, 7.0 all versions, 7.2.0 through 7.2.4, FortiClientLinux 6.4 all versions, 7.0 all versions, 7.2.0 through 7.2.4, FortiClientAndroid 6.4 all versions, 7.0 all versions, 7.2.0 and FortiClientiOS 5.6 all versions, 6.0.0 through 6.0.1, 7.0.0 through 7.0.6 SAML SSO feature may allow an unauthenticated attacker to man-in-the-middle the communication between the FortiClient and both the service provider and the identity provider. | |||||