Total
56 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2020-12457 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
An issue was discovered in wolfSSL before 4.5.0. It mishandles the change_cipher_spec (CCS) message processing logic for TLS 1.3. If an attacker sends ChangeCipherSpec messages in a crafted way involving more than one in a row, the server becomes stuck in the ProcessReply() loop, i.e., a denial of service. | |||||
CVE-2020-11735 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
The private-key operations in ecc.c in wolfSSL before 4.4.0 do not use a constant-time modular inverse when mapping to affine coordinates, aka a "projective coordinates leak." | |||||
CVE-2020-11713 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
wolfSSL 4.3.0 has mulmod code in wc_ecc_mulmod_ex in ecc.c that does not properly resist timing side-channel attacks. | |||||
CVE-2019-6439 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
examples/benchmark/tls_bench.c in a benchmark tool in wolfSSL through 3.15.7 has a heap-based buffer overflow. | |||||
CVE-2019-19963 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
An issue was discovered in wolfSSL before 4.3.0 in a non-default configuration where DSA is enabled. DSA signing uses the BEEA algorithm during modular inversion of the nonce, leading to a side-channel attack against the nonce. | |||||
CVE-2019-19962 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
wolfSSL before 4.3.0 mishandles calls to wc_SignatureGenerateHash, leading to fault injection in RSA cryptography. | |||||
CVE-2019-19960 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
In wolfSSL before 4.3.0, wc_ecc_mulmod_ex does not properly resist side-channel attacks. | |||||
CVE-2019-18840 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
In wolfSSL 4.1.0 through 4.2.0c, there are missing sanity checks of memory accesses in parsing ASN.1 certificate data while handshaking. Specifically, there is a one-byte heap-based buffer overflow inside the DecodedCert structure in GetName in wolfcrypt/src/asn.c because the domain name location index is mishandled. Because a pointer is overwritten, there is an invalid free. | |||||
CVE-2019-16748 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
In wolfSSL through 4.1.0, there is a missing sanity check of memory accesses in parsing ASN.1 certificate data while handshaking. Specifically, there is a one-byte heap-based buffer over-read in CheckCertSignature_ex in wolfcrypt/src/asn.c. | |||||
CVE-2019-15651 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
wolfSSL 4.1.0 has a one-byte heap-based buffer over-read in DecodeCertExtensions in wolfcrypt/src/asn.c because reading the ASN_BOOLEAN byte is mishandled for a crafted DER certificate in GetLength_ex. | |||||
CVE-2019-14317 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
wolfSSL and wolfCrypt 4.1.0 and earlier (formerly known as CyaSSL) generate biased DSA nonces. This allows a remote attacker to compute the long term private key from several hundred DSA signatures via a lattice attack. The issue occurs because dsa.c fixes two bits of the generated nonces. | |||||
CVE-2019-13628 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2024-11-21 | 1.2 LOW | 4.7 MEDIUM |
wolfSSL and wolfCrypt 4.0.0 and earlier (when configured without --enable-fpecc, --enable-sp, or --enable-sp-math) contain a timing side channel in ECDSA signature generation. This allows a local attacker, able to precisely measure the duration of signature operations, to infer information about the nonces used and potentially mount a lattice attack to recover the private key used. The issue occurs because ecc.c scalar multiplication might leak the bit length. | |||||
CVE-2019-11873 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
wolfSSL 4.0.0 has a Buffer Overflow in DoPreSharedKeys in tls13.c when a current identity size is greater than a client identity size. An attacker sends a crafted hello client packet over the network to a TLSv1.3 wolfSSL server. The length fields of the packet: record length, client hello length, total extensions length, PSK extension length, total identity length, and identity length contain their maximum value which is 2^16. The identity data field of the PSK extension of the packet contains the attack data, to be stored in the undefined memory (RAM) of the server. The size of the data is about 65 kB. Possibly the attacker can perform a remote code execution attack. | |||||
CVE-2018-16870 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
It was found that wolfssl before 3.15.7 is vulnerable to a new variant of the Bleichenbacher attack to perform downgrade attacks against TLS. This may lead to leakage of sensible data. | |||||
CVE-2018-12436 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2024-11-21 | 1.9 LOW | 4.7 MEDIUM |
wolfcrypt/src/ecc.c in wolfSSL before 3.15.1.patch allows a memory-cache side-channel attack on ECDSA signatures, aka the Return Of the Hidden Number Problem or ROHNP. To discover an ECDSA key, the attacker needs access to either the local machine or a different virtual machine on the same physical host. | |||||
CVE-2017-8855 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
wolfSSL before 3.11.0 does not prevent wc_DhAgree from accepting a malformed DH key. | |||||
CVE-2017-8854 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
wolfSSL before 3.10.2 has an out-of-bounds memory access with loading crafted DH parameters, aka a buffer overflow triggered by a malformed temporary DH file. | |||||
CVE-2017-6076 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2024-11-21 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
In versions of wolfSSL before 3.10.2 the function fp_mul_comba makes it easier to extract RSA key information for a malicious user who has access to view cache on a machine. | |||||
CVE-2017-2800 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
A specially crafted x509 certificate can cause a single out of bounds byte overwrite in wolfSSL through 3.10.2 resulting in potential certificate validation vulnerabilities, denial of service and possible remote code execution. In order to trigger this vulnerability, the attacker needs to supply a malicious x509 certificate to either a server or a client application using this library. | |||||
CVE-2017-13099 | 3 Arubanetworks, Siemens, Wolfssl | 4 Instant, Scalance W1750d, Scalance W1750d Firmware and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
wolfSSL prior to version 3.12.2 provides a weak Bleichenbacher oracle when any TLS cipher suite using RSA key exchange is negotiated. An attacker can recover the private key from a vulnerable wolfSSL application. This vulnerability is referred to as "ROBOT." |