Total
3565 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2009-0232 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Windows 2000, Windows Server 2003, Windows Server 2008 and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | 9.3 HIGH | N/A |
| Integer overflow in the Embedded OpenType (EOT) Font Engine in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2 and SP3, Server 2003 SP2, Vista Gold, SP1, and SP2, and Server 2008 Gold and SP2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted name table, aka "Embedded OpenType Font Integer Overflow Vulnerability." | |||||
| CVE-2009-0231 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Windows 2000, Windows Server 2003, Windows Server 2008 and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| The Embedded OpenType (EOT) Font Engine (T2EMBED.DLL) in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2 and SP3, Server 2003 SP2, Vista Gold, SP1, and SP2, and Server 2008 Gold and SP2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted name table in a data record that triggers an integer truncation and a heap-based buffer overflow, aka "Embedded OpenType Font Heap Overflow Vulnerability." | |||||
| CVE-2009-0230 | 1 Microsoft | 6 Windows 2000, Windows 2003 Server, Windows Server and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 9.0 HIGH | N/A |
| The Windows Print Spooler in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2 and SP3, Server 2003 SP2, Vista Gold, SP1, and SP2, and Server 2008 SP2 allows remote authenticated users to gain privileges via a crafted RPC message that triggers loading of a DLL file from an arbitrary directory, aka "Print Spooler Load Library Vulnerability." | |||||
| CVE-2009-0229 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Windows 2000, Windows 2003 Server, Windows Server 2008 and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.9 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The Windows Printing Service in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2 and SP3, Server 2003 SP2, Vista Gold, SP1, and SP2, and Server 2008 SP2 allows local users to read arbitrary files via a crafted separator page, aka "Print Spooler Read File Vulnerability." | |||||
| CVE-2009-0094 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Windows 2000, Windows Server 2003, Windows Server 2008 | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The WINS server in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4 and Server 2003 SP1 and SP2 does not restrict registration of the (1) "wpad" and (2) "isatap" NetBIOS names, which allows remote authenticated users to hijack the Web Proxy Auto-Discovery (WPAD) and Intra-Site Automatic Tunnel Addressing Protocol (ISATAP) features, and conduct man-in-the-middle attacks by spoofing a proxy server or ISATAP route, by registering one of these names in the WINS database, aka "WPAD WINS Server Registration Vulnerability," a related issue to CVE-2007-1692. | |||||
| CVE-2009-0093 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Windows 2000, Windows Server 2003, Windows Server 2008 | 2024-11-21 | 3.5 LOW | N/A |
| Windows DNS Server in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, Server 2003 SP1 and SP2, and Server 2008, when dynamic updates are enabled, does not restrict registration of the "wpad" hostname, which allows remote authenticated users to hijack the Web Proxy Auto-Discovery (WPAD) feature, and conduct man-in-the-middle attacks by spoofing a proxy server, via a Dynamic Update request for this hostname, aka "DNS Server Vulnerability in WPAD Registration Vulnerability," a related issue to CVE-2007-1692. | |||||
| CVE-2009-0091 | 1 Microsoft | 7 .net Framework, Windows 2000, Windows 7 and 4 more | 2024-11-21 | 9.3 HIGH | N/A |
| Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0, 2.0 SP1, and 3.5 does not properly enforce a certain type-equality constraint in .NET verifiable code, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a crafted XAML browser application (XBAP), (2) a crafted ASP.NET application, or (3) a crafted .NET Framework application, aka "Microsoft .NET Framework Type Verification Vulnerability." | |||||
| CVE-2009-0090 | 1 Microsoft | 7 .net Framework, Windows 2000, Windows 7 and 4 more | 2024-11-21 | 9.3 HIGH | N/A |
| Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0 SP3, 1.1 SP1, and 2.0 SP1 does not properly validate .NET verifiable code, which allows remote attackers to obtain unintended access to stack memory, and execute arbitrary code, via (1) a crafted XAML browser application (XBAP), (2) a crafted ASP.NET application, or (3) a crafted .NET Framework application, aka "Microsoft .NET Framework Pointer Verification Vulnerability." | |||||
| CVE-2009-0089 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Windows 2000, Windows Server 2003, Windows Server 2008 and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Windows HTTP Services (aka WinHTTP) in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2 and SP3, Server 2003 SP1 and SP2, and Vista Gold allows remote web servers to impersonate arbitrary https web sites by using DNS spoofing to "forward a connection" to a different https web site that has a valid certificate matching its own domain name, but not a certificate matching the domain name of the host requested by the user, aka "Windows HTTP Services Certificate Name Mismatch Vulnerability." | |||||
| CVE-2009-0086 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Windows 2000, Windows Server 2003, Windows Server 2008 and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Integer underflow in Windows HTTP Services (aka WinHTTP) in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2 and SP3, Server 2003 SP1 and SP2, Vista Gold and SP1, and Server 2008 allows remote HTTP servers to execute arbitrary code via crafted parameter values in a response, related to error handling, aka "Windows HTTP Services Integer Underflow Vulnerability." | |||||
| CVE-2009-0085 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Windows 2000, Windows Server 2003, Windows Server 2008 and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.1 HIGH | N/A |
| The Secure Channel (aka SChannel) authentication component in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2 and SP3, Server 2003 SP1 and SP2, Vista Gold and SP1, and Server 2008, when certificate authentication is used, does not properly validate the client's key exchange data in Transport Layer Security (TLS) handshake messages, which allows remote attackers to spoof authentication by crafting a TLS packet based on knowledge of the certificate but not the private key, aka "SChannel Spoofing Vulnerability." | |||||
| CVE-2009-0083 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Windows 2000, Windows Server 2003, Windows Server 2008 and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | N/A |
| The kernel in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2 and SP3, and Server 2003 SP1 does not properly handle invalid pointers, which allows local users to gain privileges via an application that triggers use of a crafted pointer, aka "Windows Kernel Invalid Pointer Vulnerability." | |||||
| CVE-2009-0082 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Windows 2000, Windows Server 2003, Windows Server 2008 and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | N/A |
| The kernel in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2 and SP3, Server 2003 SP1 and SP2, Vista Gold and SP1, and Server 2008 does not properly validate handles, which allows local users to gain privileges via a crafted application that triggers unspecified "actions," aka "Windows Kernel Handle Validation Vulnerability." | |||||
| CVE-2009-0081 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Windows 2000, Windows Server 2003, Windows Server 2008 and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | 9.3 HIGH | N/A |
| The graphics device interface (GDI) implementation in the kernel in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2 and SP3, Server 2003 SP1 and SP2, Vista Gold and SP1, and Server 2008 does not properly validate input received from user mode, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted (1) Windows Metafile (aka WMF) or (2) Enhanced Metafile (aka EMF) image file, aka "Windows Kernel Input Validation Vulnerability." | |||||
| CVE-2009-0080 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Windows Server 2008, Windows Vista | 2024-11-21 | 6.9 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The ThreadPool class in Windows Vista Gold and SP1, and Server 2008, does not properly implement isolation among a set of distinct processes that (1) all run under the NetworkService account or (2) all run under the LocalService account, which allows local users to gain privileges by leveraging incorrect thread ACLs to access the resources of one of the processes, aka "Windows Thread Pool ACL Weakness Vulnerability." | |||||
| CVE-2009-0078 | 1 Microsoft | 4 Windows Server 2003, Windows Server 2008, Windows Vista and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | N/A |
| The Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI) provider in Microsoft Windows XP SP2 and SP3, Server 2003 SP1 and SP2, Vista Gold and SP1, and Server 2008 does not properly implement isolation among a set of distinct processes that (1) all run under the NetworkService account or (2) all run under the LocalService account, which allows local users to gain privileges by accessing the resources of one of the processes, aka "Windows WMI Service Isolation Vulnerability." | |||||
| CVE-2009-0076 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Internet Explorer, Windows Server 2003, Windows Server 2008 and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | 9.3 HIGH | N/A |
| Microsoft Internet Explorer 7, when XHTML strict mode is used, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via the zoom style directive in conjunction with unspecified other directives in a malformed Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) stylesheet in a crafted HTML document, aka "CSS Memory Corruption Vulnerability." | |||||
| CVE-2009-0075 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Internet Explorer, Windows Server 2003, Windows Server 2008 and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | 9.3 HIGH | N/A |
| Microsoft Internet Explorer 7 does not properly handle errors during attempted access to deleted objects, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted HTML document, related to CFunctionPointer and the appending of document objects, aka "Uninitialized Memory Corruption Vulnerability." | |||||
| CVE-2008-4835 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Windows 2000, Windows Server 2003, Windows Server 2008 and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| SMB in the Server service in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2 and SP3, Server 2003 SP1 and SP2, Vista Gold and SP1, and Server 2008 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via malformed values of unspecified "fields inside the SMB packets" in an NT Trans2 request, related to "insufficiently validating the buffer size," aka "SMB Validation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." | |||||
| CVE-2008-4834 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Windows 2000, Windows Server 2003, Windows Server 2008 and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in SMB in the Server service in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2 and SP3, and Server 2003 SP1 and SP2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via malformed values of unspecified "fields inside the SMB packets" in an NT Trans request, aka "SMB Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." | |||||