Total
271338 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2007-6444 | 2024-02-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6113. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6113, Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6113 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2007-0818 | 2024-02-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-0396. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-0396. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-0396 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2008-0886 | 2024-02-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-0882. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-0882. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-0882 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2007-1627 | 2024-02-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-4606. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-4606. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-4606 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2007-5763 | 2024-02-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-0401. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2008-0401. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-0401 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2006-4854 | 2024-02-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: Unspecified vulnerability in Microsoft Office 2000 (Chinese Edition) and Microsoft PowerPoint 2000 (Chinese Edition) allows user-assisted attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted PPT document, as exploited by malware such as Trojan.PPDropper.E. NOTE: on 20060919, Microsoft notified CVE that this is a duplicate of CVE-2006-0009 | |||||
| CVE-2007-1769 | 2024-02-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-1873. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-1873. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-1873 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2007-1356 | 2024-02-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | |||||
| CVE-2007-4558 | 2024-02-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-4134. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-4134. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-4134 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2007-5049 | 2024-02-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-3387. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-3387. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-3387 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2007-0993 | 2024-02-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-0933. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-0933 due to a typo. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-0933 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2007-6440 | 2024-02-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6112. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6112. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6112 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2006-7224 | 2024-02-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-7227, CVE-2005-4872, CVE-2006-7228. Reason: this candidate was SPLIT into other identifiers in order to reflect different affected versions and distinct vendor fixes. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2006-7227, CVE-2005-4872, and CVE-2006-7228 to determine which ID is appropriate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2007-2056 | 2024-02-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: The getlock function in aimage/aimage.cpp in AFFLIB 2.2.8 and earlier allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on temporary lock files (aka "time-of-check-time-of-use file race"). NOTE: the researcher has retracted the original advisory, stating that "the portion of vulnerable code is not called in any current version of AFFLIB and is therefore not exploitable. | |||||
| CVE-2007-4049 | 2024-02-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2000-1205. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2000-1205. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2000-1205 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2006-3866 | 2024-02-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-4868. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-4868. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-4868 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2006-6967 | 2024-02-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). In addition, it describes standard behavior (publication of revocation lists) and as such does not cross privilege boundaries. Notes: the former description is: "Check Point FireWall-1 allows remote attackers to obtain certificate revocation lists (CRLs) and other unspecified sensitive information via an HTTP request for the top-level URI on the internal certificate authority (ICA) port (18264/tcp). | |||||
| CVE-2006-4896 | 2024-02-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-4785. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-4785. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-4785 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2007-6447 | 2024-02-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6114. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6114. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6114 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2007-6132 | 2024-02-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | |||||