Total
271338 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2008-6339 | 2024-02-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6339. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6339. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6339 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
CVE-2008-2727 | 2024-02-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-2725. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-2725. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-2725 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
CVE-2008-5622 | 2024-02-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-5621. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-5621. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-5621 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
CVE-2008-2373 | 2024-02-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-2863. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2008-2863. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-2863 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
CVE-2008-4042 | 2024-02-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3889. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-3889. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3889 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
CVE-2009-0786 | 2024-02-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This was originally intended for a report about TCP Wrappers and the hosts_ctl API function, but further investigation showed that this was documented behavior by that function. Notes: Future CVE identifiers might be assigned to applications that mis-use the API in a security-relevant fashion. | |||||
CVE-2009-1676 | 2024-02-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-1535. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-1535. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-1535 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
CVE-2009-2315 | 2024-02-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-2204. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-2204. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-2204 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
CVE-2008-2033 | 2024-02-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-1381. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-1381. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-1381 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
CVE-2009-3239 | 2024-02-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-2139, CVE-2009-2140. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-2139 and CVE-2009-2140. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-2139 and CVE-2009-2140 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
CVE-2009-0782 | 2024-02-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | |||||
CVE-2008-1674 | 2024-02-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | |||||
CVE-2009-0242 | 2024-02-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: gmetad in Ganglia 3.1.1, when supporting multiple requests per connection on an interactive port, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a request to the gmetad service with a path that does not exist, which causes Ganglia to (1) perform excessive CPU computation and (2) send the entire tree, which consumes network bandwidth. NOTE: the vendor and original researcher have disputed this issue, since legitimate requests can generate the same amount of resource consumption. CVE concurs with the dispute, so this identifier should not be used | |||||
CVE-2008-5020 | 2024-02-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-0017. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2008-0017. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-0017 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
CVE-2008-4317 | 2024-02-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-5019. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2008-5019. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-5019 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
CVE-2008-3427 | 2024-02-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3420. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-3420. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3420 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
CVE-2008-2804 | 2024-02-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-2800. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2008-2800. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-2800 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
CVE-2008-4312 | 2024-02-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | |||||
CVE-2009-1205 | 2024-02-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-4475. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-4475. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-4475 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
CVE-2009-4132 | 2024-02-28 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-4214. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-4214. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-4214 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |