Filtered by vendor Mcafee
Subscribe
Total
603 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-14578 | 7 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 4 more | 20 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 17 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 3.7 LOW |
| Vulnerability in the Java SE, Java SE Embedded product of Oracle Java SE (component: Libraries). Supported versions that are affected are Java SE: 7u261 and 8u251; Java SE Embedded: 8u251. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Java SE, Java SE Embedded. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Java SE, Java SE Embedded. Note: Applies to client and server deployment of Java. This vulnerability can be exploited through sandboxed Java Web Start applications and sandboxed Java applets. It can also be exploited by supplying data to APIs in the specified Component without using sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets, such as through a web service. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 3.7 (Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L). | |||||
| CVE-2020-13938 | 4 Apache, Mcafee, Microsoft and 1 more | 4 Http Server, Epolicy Orchestrator, Windows and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| Apache HTTP Server versions 2.4.0 to 2.4.46 Unprivileged local users can stop httpd on Windows | |||||
| CVE-2020-13935 | 7 Apache, Canonical, Debian and 4 more | 18 Tomcat, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 15 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| The payload length in a WebSocket frame was not correctly validated in Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M6, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.36, 8.5.0 to 8.5.56 and 7.0.27 to 7.0.104. Invalid payload lengths could trigger an infinite loop. Multiple requests with invalid payload lengths could lead to a denial of service. | |||||
| CVE-2020-0543 | 6 Canonical, Fedoraproject, Intel and 3 more | 719 Ubuntu Linux, Fedora, Celeron 1000m and 716 more | 2024-11-21 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| Incomplete cleanup from specific special register read operations in some Intel(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access. | |||||
| CVE-2019-9518 | 11 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 8 more | 20 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 17 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a flood of empty frames, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of frames with an empty payload and without the end-of-stream flag. These frames can be DATA, HEADERS, CONTINUATION and/or PUSH_PROMISE. The peer spends time processing each frame disproportionate to attack bandwidth. This can consume excess CPU. | |||||
| CVE-2019-9517 | 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more | 25 Http Server, Traffic Server, Mac Os X and 22 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to unconstrained interal data buffering, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens the HTTP/2 window so the peer can send without constraint; however, they leave the TCP window closed so the peer cannot actually write (many of) the bytes on the wire. The attacker then sends a stream of requests for a large response object. Depending on how the servers queue the responses, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both. | |||||
| CVE-2019-9516 | 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more | 21 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 18 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a header leak, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of headers with a 0-length header name and 0-length header value, optionally Huffman encoded into 1-byte or greater headers. Some implementations allocate memory for these headers and keep the allocation alive until the session dies. This can consume excess memory. | |||||
| CVE-2019-9515 | 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more | 24 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 21 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. | |||||
| CVE-2019-9514 | 13 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 10 more | 30 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 27 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens a number of streams and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a stream of RST_STREAM frames from the peer. Depending on how the peer queues the RST_STREAM frames, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both. | |||||
| CVE-2019-9513 | 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more | 22 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 19 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to resource loops, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker creates multiple request streams and continually shuffles the priority of the streams in a way that causes substantial churn to the priority tree. This can consume excess CPU. | |||||
| CVE-2019-9511 | 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more | 22 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 19 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker requests a large amount of data from a specified resource over multiple streams. They manipulate window size and stream priority to force the server to queue the data in 1-byte chunks. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. | |||||
| CVE-2019-9169 | 4 Canonical, Gnu, Mcafee and 1 more | 6 Ubuntu Linux, Glibc, Web Gateway and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) through 2.29, proceed_next_node in posix/regexec.c has a heap-based buffer over-read via an attempted case-insensitive regular-expression match. | |||||
| CVE-2019-6454 | 8 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 5 more | 22 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 19 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.9 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in sd-bus in systemd 239. bus_process_object() in libsystemd/sd-bus/bus-objects.c allocates a variable-length stack buffer for temporarily storing the object path of incoming D-Bus messages. An unprivileged local user can exploit this by sending a specially crafted message to PID1, causing the stack pointer to jump over the stack guard pages into an unmapped memory region and trigger a denial of service (systemd PID1 crash and kernel panic). | |||||
| CVE-2019-3738 | 3 Dell, Mcafee, Oracle | 16 Bsafe Cert-j, Bsafe Crypto-j, Bsafe Ssl-j and 13 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.5 are vulnerable to a Missing Required Cryptographic Step vulnerability. A malicious remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to coerce two parties into computing the same predictable shared key. | |||||
| CVE-2019-3670 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Web Advisor | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 8.0 HIGH |
| Remote Code Execution vulnerability in the web interface in McAfee Web Advisor (WA) 8.0.34745 and earlier allows remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code via a cross site scripting attack. | |||||
| CVE-2019-3667 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Techcheck | 2024-11-21 | 4.4 MEDIUM | 6.6 MEDIUM |
| DLL Search Order Hijacking vulnerability in the Microsoft Windows client in McAfee Tech Check 3.0.0.17 and earlier allows local users to execute arbitrary code via the local folder placed there by an attacker. | |||||
| CVE-2019-3666 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Webadvisor | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| API Abuse/Misuse vulnerability in the web interface in McAfee Web Advisor (WA) prior to 4.1.1.48 allows remote unauthenticated attacker to allow the browser to navigate to restricted websites via a carefully crafted web site. | |||||
| CVE-2019-3665 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Webadvisor | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Code Injection vulnerability in the web interface in McAfee Web Advisor (WA) prior to 4.1.1.48 allows remote unauthenticated attacker to allow the browser to render a website which Web Advisor would normally have blocked via a carefully crafted web site. | |||||
| CVE-2019-3663 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Advanced Threat Defense | 2024-11-21 | 2.1 LOW | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Unprotected Storage of Credentials vulnerability in McAfee Advanced Threat Defense (ATD) prior to 4.8 allows local attacker to gain access to the root password via accessing sensitive files on the system. This was originally published with a CVSS rating of High, further investigation has resulted in this being updated to Critical. The root password is common across all instances of ATD prior to 4.8. See the Security bulletin for further details | |||||
| CVE-2019-3662 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Advanced Threat Defense | 2024-11-21 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Path Traversal: '/absolute/pathname/here' vulnerability in McAfee Advanced Threat Defense (ATD) prior to 4.8 allows remote authenticated attacker to gain unintended access to files on the system via carefully constructed HTTP requests. | |||||