Total
28702 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-1127 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Windows 10, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2019 | 2024-02-28 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that DirectWrite handles objects in memory, aka 'DirectWrite Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1117, CVE-2019-1118, CVE-2019-1119, CVE-2019-1120, CVE-2019-1121, CVE-2019-1122, CVE-2019-1123, CVE-2019-1124, CVE-2019-1128. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1291 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Windows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8.1 and 5 more | 2024-02-28 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the Windows Remote Desktop Client when a user connects to a malicious server, aka 'Remote Desktop Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0787, CVE-2019-0788, CVE-2019-1290. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11540 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 3 Connect Secure, Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2024-02-28 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.4 and 8.3RX before 8.3R7.1 and Pulse Policy Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.2 and 5.4RX before 5.4R7.1, an unauthenticated, remote attacker can conduct a session hijacking attack. | |||||
| CVE-2019-0898 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Windows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8.1 and 5 more | 2024-02-28 | 9.3 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Jet Database Engine improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Jet Database Engine Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0889, CVE-2019-0890, CVE-2019-0891, CVE-2019-0893, CVE-2019-0894, CVE-2019-0895, CVE-2019-0896, CVE-2019-0897, CVE-2019-0899, CVE-2019-0900, CVE-2019-0901, CVE-2019-0902. | |||||
| CVE-2019-0628 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Windows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8.1 and 5 more | 2024-02-28 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the win32k component improperly provides kernel information, aka 'Win32k Information Disclosure Vulnerability'. | |||||
| CVE-2018-13368 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlient | 2024-02-28 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| A local privilege escalation in Fortinet FortiClient for Windows 6.0.4 and earlier allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via the command injection. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1285 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Windows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8.1 and 5 more | 2024-02-28 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1256. | |||||
| CVE-2019-3971 | 1 Comodo | 1 Antivirus | 2024-02-28 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| Comodo Antivirus versions up to 12.0.0.6810 are vulnerable to a local Denial of Service affecting CmdVirth.exe via its LPC port "cmdvrtLPCServerPort". A low privileged local process can connect to this port and send an LPC_DATAGRAM, which triggers an Access Violation due to hardcoded NULLs used for Source parameter in a memcpy operation that is called for this handler. This results in CmdVirth.exe and its child svchost.exe instances to terminate. | |||||
| CVE-2019-0953 | 1 Microsoft | 4 Office, Office 365 Proplus, Office Online Server and 1 more | 2024-02-28 | 9.3 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Microsoft Word software when it fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. | |||||
| CVE-2019-0889 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Windows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8.1 and 5 more | 2024-02-28 | 9.3 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Jet Database Engine improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Jet Database Engine Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0890, CVE-2019-0891, CVE-2019-0893, CVE-2019-0894, CVE-2019-0895, CVE-2019-0896, CVE-2019-0897, CVE-2019-0898, CVE-2019-0899, CVE-2019-0900, CVE-2019-0901, CVE-2019-0902. | |||||
| CVE-2019-2812 | 2 Oracle, Redhat | 6 Mysql, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Eus and 3 more | 2024-02-28 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Vulnerability in the MySQL Server component of Oracle MySQL (subcomponent: Server: Optimizer). Supported versions that are affected are 8.0.16 and prior. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise MySQL Server. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of MySQL Server. CVSS 3.0 Base Score 6.5 (Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H). | |||||
| CVE-2019-2696 | 1 Oracle | 1 Vm Virtualbox | 2024-02-28 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox component of Oracle Virtualization (subcomponent: Core). Supported versions that are affected are Prior to 5.2.28 and prior to 6.0.6. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.0 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H). | |||||
| CVE-2019-0090 | 1 Intel | 2 Converged Security And Management Engine, Server Platform Services | 2024-02-28 | 4.4 MEDIUM | 7.1 HIGH |
| Insufficient access control vulnerability in subsystem for Intel(R) CSME before versions 11.x, 12.0.35 Intel(R) TXE 3.x, 4.x, Intel(R) Server Platform Services 3.x, 4.x, Intel(R) SPS before version SPS_E3_05.00.04.027.0 may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via physical access. | |||||
| CVE-2019-0908 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Windows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8.1 and 5 more | 2024-02-28 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Jet Database Engine improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Jet Database Engine Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0904, CVE-2019-0905, CVE-2019-0906, CVE-2019-0907, CVE-2019-0909, CVE-2019-0974. | |||||
| CVE-2019-5811 | 4 Debian, Fedoraproject, Google and 1 more | 5 Debian Linux, Fedora, Chrome and 2 more | 2024-02-28 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Incorrect handling of CORS in ServiceWorker in Google Chrome prior to 74.0.3729.108 allowed a remote attacker to bypass same origin policy via a crafted HTML page. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1086 | 1 Microsoft | 6 Windows 10, Windows 8.1, Windows Rt 8.1 and 3 more | 2024-02-28 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| An elevation of privilege exists in Windows Audio Service, aka 'Windows Audio Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1087, CVE-2019-1088. | |||||
| CVE-2019-3621 | 2 Mcafee, Microsoft | 2 Data Loss Prevention Endpoint, Windows | 2024-02-28 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 6.2 MEDIUM |
| Authentication protection bypass vulnerability in McAfee Data Loss Prevention (DLPe) for Windows 11.x prior to 11.3.0 allows physical local user to bypass the Windows lock screen via DLPe processes being killed just prior to the screen being locked or when the screen is locked. The attacker requires physical access to the machine. | |||||
| CVE-2019-0357 | 1 Sap | 1 Hana | 2024-02-28 | 7.2 HIGH | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| The administrator of SAP HANA database, before versions 1.0 and 2.0, can misuse HANA to execute commands with operating system "root" privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2018-8029 | 1 Apache | 1 Hadoop | 2024-02-28 | 9.0 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| In Apache Hadoop versions 3.0.0-alpha1 to 3.1.0, 2.9.0 to 2.9.1, and 2.2.0 to 2.8.4, a user who can escalate to yarn user can possibly run arbitrary commands as root user. | |||||
| CVE-2019-5883 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2024-02-28 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| An Incorrect Access Control issue was discovered in GitLab Community and Enterprise Edition 6.0 and later but before 11.3.11, 11.4.x before 11.4.8, and 11.5.x before 11.5.1. The issue comments feature could allow a user to comment on an issue which they shouldn't be allowed to. | |||||