Total
1195 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-25972 | 1 Tuzitio | 1 Camaleon Cms | 2024-02-28 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.9 MEDIUM |
| In Camaleon CMS, versions 2.1.2.0 to 2.6.0, are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the media upload feature, which allows admin users to fetch media files from external URLs but fails to validate URLs referencing to localhost or other internal servers. This allows attackers to read files stored in the internal server. | |||||
| CVE-2021-25939 | 1 Arangodb | 1 Arangodb | 2024-02-28 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 2.7 LOW |
| In ArangoDB, versions v3.7.0 through v3.9.0-alpha.1 have a feature which allows downloading a Foxx service from a publicly available URL. This feature does not enforce proper filtering of requests performed internally, which can be abused by a highly-privileged attacker to perform blind SSRF and send internal requests to localhost. | |||||
| CVE-2021-37104 | 1 Huawei | 2 P40, P40 Firmware | 2024-02-28 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| There is a server-side request forgery vulnerability in HUAWEI P40 versions 10.1.0.118(C00E116R3P3). This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of parameters while dealing with some messages. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to gain access to certain resource which the attacker are supposed not to do. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22033 | 1 Vmware | 3 Cloud Foundation, Vrealize Operations, Vrealize Suite Lifecycle Manager | 2024-02-28 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 2.7 LOW |
| Releases prior to VMware vRealize Operations 8.6 contain a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2021-39303 | 1 Jamf | 1 Jamf | 2024-02-28 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The server in Jamf Pro before 10.32.0 has an SSRF vulnerability, aka PI-006352. NOTE: Jamf Nation will also publish an article about this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2021-4075 | 1 Snipeitapp | 1 Snipe-it | 2024-02-28 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| snipe-it is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) | |||||
| CVE-2022-22993 | 1 Westerndigital | 11 My Cloud, My Cloud Dl2100, My Cloud Dl4100 and 8 more | 2024-02-28 | 8.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| A limited SSRF vulnerability was discovered on Western Digital My Cloud devices that could allow an attacker to impersonate a server and reach any page on the server by bypassing access controls. The vulnerability was addressed by creating a whitelist for valid parameters. | |||||
| CVE-2021-40809 | 1 Jamf | 1 Jamf | 2024-02-28 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Jamf Pro before 10.32.0, aka PI-009921. An account can be granted incorrect privileges in response to authentication that uses specific sign-on workflows. | |||||
| CVE-2020-24327 | 1 Discourse | 1 Discourse | 2024-02-28 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in Discourse 2.3.2 and 2.6 via the email function. When writing an email in an editor, you can upload pictures of remote websites. | |||||
| CVE-2022-21697 | 1 Jupyter | 1 Jupyter Server Proxy | 2024-02-28 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 7.1 HIGH |
| Jupyter Server Proxy is a Jupyter notebook server extension to proxy web services. Versions of Jupyter Server Proxy prior to 3.2.1 are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). Any user deploying Jupyter Server or Notebook with jupyter-proxy-server extension enabled is affected. A lack of input validation allows authenticated clients to proxy requests to other hosts, bypassing the `allowed_hosts` check. Because authentication is required, which already grants permissions to make the same requests via kernel or terminal execution, this is considered low to moderate severity. Users may upgrade to version 3.2.1 to receive a patch or, as a workaround, install the patch manually. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23206 | 1 Apache | 1 Traffic Control | 2024-02-28 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| In Apache Traffic Control Traffic Ops prior to 6.1.0 or 5.1.6, an unprivileged user who can reach Traffic Ops over HTTPS can send a specially-crafted POST request to /user/login/oauth to scan a port of a server that Traffic Ops can reach. | |||||
| CVE-2021-43780 | 1 Redash | 1 Redash | 2024-02-28 | 6.0 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Redash is a package for data visualization and sharing. In versions 10.0 and priorm the implementation of URL-loading data sources like JSON, CSV, or Excel is vulnerable to advanced methods of Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF). These vulnerabilities are only exploitable on installations where a URL-loading data source is enabled. As of time of publication, the `master` and `release/10.x.x` branches address this by applying the Advocate library for making http requests instead of the requests library directly. Users should upgrade to version 10.0.1 to receive this patch. There are a few workarounds for mitigating the vulnerability without upgrading. One can disable the vulnerable data sources entirely, by adding the following env variable to one's configuration, making them unavailable inside the webapp. One can switch any data source of certain types (viewable in the GitHub Security Advisory) to be `View Only` for all groups on the Settings > Groups > Data Sources screen. For users unable to update an admin may modify Redash's configuration through environment variables to mitigate this issue. Depending on the version of Redash, an admin may also need to run a CLI command to re-encrypt some fields in the database. The `master` and `release/10.x.x` branches as of time of publication have removed the default value for `REDASH_COOKIE_SECRET`. All future releases will also require this to be set explicitly. For existing installations, one will need to ensure that explicit values are set for the `REDASH_COOKIE_SECRET` and `REDASH_SECRET_KEY `variables. | |||||
| CVE-2021-39894 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2024-02-28 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| In all versions of GitLab CE/EE since version 8.0, a DNS rebinding vulnerability exists in Fogbugz importer which may be used by attackers to exploit Server Side Request Forgery attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2021-35512 | 1 Zohocorp | 1 Manageengine Applications Manager | 2024-02-28 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| An SSRF issue was discovered in Zoho ManageEngine Applications Manager build 15200. | |||||
| CVE-2021-43296 | 1 Zohocorp | 1 Manageengine Supportcenter Plus | 2024-02-28 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Zoho ManageEngine SupportCenter Plus before 11016 is vulnerable to an SSRF attack in ActionExecutor. | |||||
| CVE-2020-28943 | 1 Open-xchange | 1 Open-xchange Appsuite | 2024-02-28 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| OX App Suite 7.10.4 and earlier allows SSRF via a snippet. | |||||
| CVE-2020-20582 | 1 Mipcms | 1 Mipcms | 2024-02-28 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A server side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in /ApiAdminDomainSettings.php of MipCMS 5.0.1 allows attackers to access sensitive information. | |||||
| CVE-2021-29102 | 1 Esri | 1 Arcgis Server | 2024-02-28 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in ArcGIS Server Manager version 10.8.1 and below may allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to forge GET requests to arbitrary URLs from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20483 | 4 Ibm, Linux, Microsoft and 1 more | 5 Aix, Security Identity Manager, Linux Kernel and 2 more | 2024-02-28 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM Security Identity Manager 6.0.2 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). By sending a specially crafted request, a remote authenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensitive data. IBM X-Force ID: 197591. | |||||
| CVE-2021-31950 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Sharepoint Foundation, Sharepoint Server | 2024-02-28 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 7.6 HIGH |
| Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing Vulnerability | |||||