Total
1256 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-39383 | 1 Linuxfoundation | 1 Kubevela | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 4.9 MEDIUM |
| KubeVela is an open source application delivery platform. Users using the VelaUX APIServer could be affected by this vulnerability. When using Helm Chart as the component delivery method, the request address of the warehouse is not restricted, and there is a blind SSRF vulnerability. Users who're using v1.6, please update the v1.6.1. Users who're using v1.5, please update the v1.5.8. There are no known workarounds for this issue. | |||||
| CVE-2022-39276 | 1 Glpi-project | 1 Glpi | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 3.5 LOW |
| GLPI stands for Gestionnaire Libre de Parc Informatique. GLPI is a Free Asset and IT Management Software package that provides ITIL Service Desk features, licenses tracking and software auditing. Usage of RSS feeds or an external calendar in planning is subject to SSRF exploit. In case a remote script returns a redirect response, the redirect target URL is not checked against the URL allow list defined by administrator. This issue has been patched, please upgrade to 10.0.4. There are currently no known workarounds. | |||||
| CVE-2022-39241 | 1 Discourse | 1 Discourse | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.6 HIGH |
| Discourse is a platform for community discussion. A malicious admin could use this vulnerability to perform port enumeration on the local host or other hosts on the internal network, as well as against hosts on the Internet. Latest `stable`, `beta`, and `test-passed` versions are now patched. As a workaround, self-hosters can use `DISCOURSE_BLOCKED_IP_BLOCKS` env var (which overrides `blocked_ip_blocks` setting) to stop webhooks from accessing private IPs. | |||||
| CVE-2022-39239 | 1 Nuxtjs | 1 Netlify-ipx | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| netlify-ipx is an on-Demand image optimization for Netlify using ipx. In versions prior to 1.2.3, an attacker can bypass the source image domain allowlist by sending specially crafted headers, causing the handler to load and return arbitrary images. Because the response is cached globally, this image will then be served to visitors without requiring those headers to be set. XSS can be achieved by requesting a malicious SVG with embedded scripts, which would then be served from the site domain. Note that this does not apply to images loaded in `<img>` tags, as scripts do not execute in this context. The image URL can be set in the header independently of the request URL, meaning any site images that have not previously been cached can have their cache poisoned. This problem has been fixed in version 1.2.3. As a workaround, cached content can be cleared by re-deploying the site. | |||||
| CVE-2022-39211 | 1 Nextcloud | 2 Nextcloud Enterprise Server, Nextcloud Server | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 3.0 LOW |
| Nextcloud server is an open source personal cloud platform. In affected versions it was found that locally running webservices can be found and requested erroneously. It is recommended that the Nextcloud Server is upgraded to 23.0.8 or 24.0.4. It is recommended that the Nextcloud Enterprise Server is upgraded to 22.2.10.4, 23.0.8 or 24.0.4. There are no known workarounds for this issue. | |||||
| CVE-2022-39055 | 1 Changingtec | 1 Rava Certificate Validation System | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| RAVA certificate validation system has inadequate filtering for URL parameter. An unauthenticated remote attacker can perform SSRF attack to discover internal network topology base on query response. | |||||
| CVE-2022-39039 | 1 Aenrich | 1 A\+hrd | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| aEnrich’s a+HRD has inadequate filtering for specific URL parameter. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability to send arbitrary HTTP(s) request to launch Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack, to perform arbitrary system command or disrupt service. | |||||
| CVE-2022-38931 | 1 Baijiacms Project | 1 Baijiacms | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in fetch_net_file_upload function of baijiacmsV4 v4.1.4 allows remote attackers to force the application to make arbitrary requests via injection of arbitrary URLs into the url parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2022-38708 | 1 Ibm | 1 Cognos Analytics | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM Cognos Analytics 11.1.7 11.2.0, and 11.2.1 could be vulnerable to a Server-Side Request Forgery Attack (SSRF) attack by constructing URLs from user-controlled data. This could enable attackers to make arbitrary requests to the internal network or to the local file system. IBM X-Force ID: 234180. | |||||
| CVE-2022-38648 | 2 Apache, Debian | 2 Batik, Debian Linux | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Batik of Apache XML Graphics allows an attacker to fetch external resources. This issue affects Apache XML Graphics Batik 1.14. | |||||
| CVE-2022-38580 | 1 Zalando | 1 Skipper | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Zalando Skipper v0.13.236 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). | |||||
| CVE-2022-38398 | 2 Apache, Debian | 2 Batik, Debian Linux | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Batik of Apache XML Graphics allows an attacker to load a url thru the jar protocol. This issue affects Apache XML Graphics Batik 1.14. | |||||
| CVE-2022-38298 | 1 Appsmith | 1 Appsmith | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Appsmith v1.7.11 was discovered to allow attackers to execute an authenticated Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via redirecting incoming requests to the AWS internal metadata endpoint. | |||||
| CVE-2022-38292 | 1 Slims | 1 Senayan Library Management System | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| SLiMS Senayan Library Management System v9.4.2 was discovered to contain multiple Server-Side Request Forgeries via the components /bibliography/marcsru.php and /bibliography/z3950sru.php. | |||||
| CVE-2022-38212 | 1 Esri | 1 Portal For Arcgis | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Protections against potential Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities in Esri Portal for ArcGIS versions 10.8.1 and below were not fully honored and may allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to forge requests to arbitrary URLs from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or reading from hosts inside the network perimeter, a different issue than CVE-2022-38211 and CVE-2022-38203. | |||||
| CVE-2022-38211 | 1 Esri | 1 Portal For Arcgis | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Protections against potential Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities in Esri Portal for ArcGIS versions 10.9.1 and below were not fully honored and may allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to forge requests to arbitrary URLs from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or reading from hosts inside the network perimeter, a different issue than CVE-2022-38211 and CVE-2022-38212. | |||||
| CVE-2022-38203 | 1 Esri | 1 Portal For Arcgis | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Protections against potential Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities in Esri Portal for ArcGIS versions 10.8.1 and below were not fully honored and may allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to forge requests to arbitrary URLs from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or reading from hosts inside the network perimeter, a different issue than CVE-2022-38211 and CVE-2022-38212. | |||||
| CVE-2022-37938 | 1 Hpe | 1 Serviceguard For Linux | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Unauthenticated server side request forgery in HPE Serviceguard Manager | |||||
| CVE-2022-37313 | 1 Open-xchange | 1 Open-xchange Appsuite | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| OX App Suite through 7.10.6 allows SSRF because the anti-SSRF protection mechanism only checks the first DNS AA or AAAA record. | |||||
| CVE-2022-37041 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Collaboration | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in ProxyServlet.java in the /proxy servlet in Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) 8.8.15 and 9.0. The value of the X-Forwarded-Host header overwrites the value of the Host header in proxied requests. The value of X-Forwarded-Host header is not checked against the whitelist of hosts that ZCS is allowed to proxy to (the zimbraProxyAllowedDomains setting). | |||||