Total
3179 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-42367 | 1 Variation Swatches For Woocommerce Project | 1 Variation Swatches For Woocommerce | 2024-11-21 | 3.5 LOW | 6.4 MEDIUM |
| The Variation Swatches for WooCommerce WordPress plugin is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via several parameters found in the ~/includes/class-menu-page.php file which allows attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts, in versions up to and including 2.1.1. Due to missing authorization checks on the tawcvs_save_settings function, low-level authenticated users such as subscribers can exploit this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2021-42359 | 1 Legalweb | 1 Wp Dsgvo Tools | 2024-11-21 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| WP DSGVO Tools (GDPR) <= 3.1.23 had an AJAX action, ‘admin-dismiss-unsubscribe‘, which lacked a capability check and a nonce check and was available to unauthenticated users, and did not check the post type when deleting unsubscription requests. As such, it was possible for an attacker to permanently delete an arbitrary post or page on the site by sending an AJAX request with the “action” parameter set to “admin-dismiss-unsubscribe” and the “id” parameter set to the post to be deleted. Sending such a request would move the post to the trash, and repeating the request would permanently delete the post in question. | |||||
| CVE-2021-42331 | 1 Xinheinformation | 1 Xinhe Teaching Platform System | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| The “Study Edit” function of ShinHer StudyOnline System does not perform permission control. After logging in with user’s privilege, remote attackers can access and edit other users’ tutorial schedule by crafting URL parameters. | |||||
| CVE-2021-42062 | 1 Sap | 1 Erp Human Capital Management | 2024-11-21 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| SAP ERP HCM Portugal does not perform necessary authorization checks for a report that reads the payroll data of employees in a certain area. Since the affected report only reads the payroll information, the attacker can neither modify any information nor cause availability impacts. | |||||
| CVE-2021-41803 | 1 Hashicorp | 1 Consul | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH |
| HashiCorp Consul 1.8.1 up to 1.11.8, 1.12.4, and 1.13.1 do not properly validate the node or segment names prior to interpolation and usage in JWT claim assertions with the auto config RPC. Fixed in 1.11.9, 1.12.5, and 1.13.2." | |||||
| CVE-2021-41729 | 1 Baicloud-cms Project | 1 Baicloud-cms | 2024-11-21 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| BaiCloud-cms v2.5.7 is affected by an arbitrary file deletion vulnerability, which allows an attacker to delete arbitrary files on the server through /user/ppsave.php. | |||||
| CVE-2021-41554 | 1 Archibus | 1 Web Central | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| ARCHIBUS Web Central 21.3.3.815 (a version from 2014) does not properly validate requests for access to data and functionality in these affected endpoints: /archibus/schema/ab-edit-users.axvw, /archibus/schema/ab-data-dictionary-table.axvw, /archibus/schema/ab-schema-add-field.axvw, /archibus/schema/ab-core/views/process-navigator/ab-my-user-profile.axvw. By not verifying the permissions for access to resources, it allows a potential attacker to view pages that are not allowed. Specifically, it was found that any authenticated user can reach the administrative console for user management by directly requesting access to the page via URL. This allows a malicious user to modify all users' profiles, to elevate any privileges to administrative ones, or to create or delete any type of user. It is also possible to modify the emails of other users, through a misconfiguration of the username parameter, on the user profile page. This is fixed in all recent versions, such as version 26. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer. Version 21.3 was officially de-supported by the end of 2020 | |||||
| CVE-2021-41238 | 1 Hangfire | 1 Hangfire | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 8.6 HIGH |
| Hangfire is an open source system to perform background job processing in a .NET or .NET Core applications. No Windows Service or separate process required. Dashboard UI in Hangfire.Core uses authorization filters to protect it from showing sensitive data to unauthorized users. By default when no custom authorization filters specified, `LocalRequestsOnlyAuthorizationFilter` filter is being used to allow only local requests and prohibit all the remote requests to provide sensible, protected by default settings. However due to the recent changes, in version 1.7.25 no authorization filters are used by default, allowing remote requests to succeed. If you are using `UseHangfireDashboard` method with default `DashboardOptions.Authorization` property value, then your installation is impacted. If any other authorization filter is specified in the `DashboardOptions.Authorization` property, the you are not impacted. Patched versions (1.7.26) are available both on Nuget.org and as a tagged release on the github repo. Default authorization rules now prohibit remote requests by default again by including the `LocalRequestsOnlyAuthorizationFilter` filter to the default settings. Please upgrade to the newest version in order to mitigate the issue. For users who are unable to upgrade it is possible to mitigate the issue by using the `LocalRequestsOnlyAuthorizationFilter` explicitly when configuring the Dashboard UI. | |||||
| CVE-2021-41112 | 1 Pagerduty | 1 Rundeck | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Rundeck is an open source automation service with a web console, command line tools and a WebAPI. In versions prior to 3.4.5, authenticated users could craft a request to modify or delete System or Project level Calendars, without appropriate authorization. Modifying or removing calendars could cause Scheduled Jobs to execute, or not execute on desired calendar days. Severity depends on trust level of authenticated users and impact of running or not running scheduled jobs on days governed by calendar definitions. Version 3.4.5 contains a patch for this issue. There are currently no known workarounds. | |||||
| CVE-2021-41077 | 1 Travis-ci | 1 Travis Ci | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| The activation process in Travis CI, for certain 2021-09-03 through 2021-09-10 builds, causes secret data to have unexpected sharing that is not specified by the customer-controlled .travis.yml file. In particular, the desired behavior (if .travis.yml has been created locally by a customer, and added to git) is for a Travis service to perform builds in a way that prevents public access to customer-specific secret environment data such as signing keys, access credentials, and API tokens. However, during the stated 8-day interval, secret data could be revealed to an unauthorized actor who forked a public repository and printed files during a build process. | |||||
| CVE-2021-41066 | 1 Bopsoft | 1 Listary | 2024-11-21 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Listary through 6. When Listary is configured as admin, Listary will not ask for permissions again if a user tries to access files on the system from Listary itself (it will bypass UAC protection; there is no privilege validation of the current user that runs via Listary). | |||||
| CVE-2021-40884 | 1 Projectsend | 1 Projectsend | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Projectsend version r1295 is affected by sensitive information disclosure. Because of not checking authorization in ids parameter in files-edit.php and id parameter in process.php function, a user with uploader role can download and edit all files of users in application. | |||||
| CVE-2021-40853 | 1 Tcman | 1 Gim | 2024-11-21 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| TCMAN GIM does not perform an authorization check when trying to access determined resources. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to access URL that require privileges without having them. The exploitation of this vulnerability might allow a remote attacker to obtain sensible information. | |||||
| CVE-2021-40502 | 1 Sap | 1 Commerce | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| SAP Commerce - versions 2105.3, 2011.13, 2005.18, 1905.34, does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges. Authenticated attackers will be able to access and edit data from b2b units they do not belong to. | |||||
| CVE-2021-40501 | 1 Sap | 1 Abap Platform Kernel | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| SAP ABAP Platform Kernel - versions 7.77, 7.81, 7.85, 7.86, does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated business user, resulting in escalation of privileges. That means this business user is able to read and modify data beyond the vulnerable system. However, the attacker can neither significantly reduce the performance of the system nor stop the system. | |||||
| CVE-2021-40379 | 1 Comprotech | 8 Ip570, Ip570 Firmware, Ip60 and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered on Compro IP70 2.08_7130218, IP570 2.08_7130520, IP60, and TN540 devices. rstp://.../medias2 does not require authorization. | |||||
| CVE-2021-40378 | 1 Comprotech | 8 Ip570, Ip570 Firmware, Ip60 and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 8.5 HIGH | 8.1 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered on Compro IP70 2.08_7130218, IP570 2.08_7130520, IP60, and TN540 devices. /cgi-bin/support/killps.cgi deletes all data from the device. | |||||
| CVE-2021-40327 | 1 Trustedfirmware | 1 Trusted Firmware-m | 2024-11-21 | 2.6 LOW | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| Trusted Firmware-M (TF-M) 1.4.0, when Profile Small is used, has incorrect access control. NSPE can access a secure key (held by the Crypto service) based solely on knowledge of its key ID. For example, there is no authorization check associated with the relationship between a caller and a key owner. | |||||
| CVE-2021-40088 | 1 Primekey | 1 Ejbca | 2024-11-21 | 4.9 MEDIUM | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in PrimeKey EJBCA before 7.6.0. CMP RA Mode can be configured to use a known client certificate to authenticate enrolling clients. The same RA client certificate is used for revocation requests as well. While enrollment enforces multi tenancy constraints (by verifying that the client certificate has access to the CA and Profiles being enrolled against), this check was not performed when authenticating revocation operations, allowing a known tenant to revoke a certificate belonging to another tenant. | |||||
| CVE-2021-3814 | 1 Redhat | 1 3scale | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| It was found that 3scale's APIdocs does not validate the access token, in the case of invalid token, it uses session auth instead. This conceivably bypasses access controls and permits unauthorized information disclosure. | |||||