Total
3851 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2005-2368 | 1 Vim Development Group | 1 Vim | 2024-11-20 | 9.3 HIGH | N/A |
| vim 6.3 before 6.3.082, with modelines enabled, allows external user-assisted attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in the (1) glob or (2) expand commands of a foldexpr expression for calculating fold levels. | |||||
| CVE-2004-2732 | 1 Netbilling | 1 Netbilling | 2024-11-20 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| nbmember.cgi in Netbilling 2.0 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via the cmd=test option, which can be leveraged to determine the access key. | |||||
| CVE-2003-0041 | 3 Mandrakesoft, Mit, Redhat | 4 Mandrake Linux, Mandrake Multi Network Firewall, Kerberos Ftp Client and 1 more | 2024-11-20 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Kerberos FTP client allows remote FTP sites to execute arbitrary code via a pipe (|) character in a filename that is retrieved by the client. | |||||
| CVE-2002-1898 | 1 Apple | 2 Mac Os X, Terminal | 2024-11-20 | 7.2 HIGH | N/A |
| Terminal 1.3 in Apple Mac OS X 10.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in a telnet:// link, which is executed by Terminal.app window. | |||||
| CVE-2002-1660 | 1 Jelsoft | 1 Vbulletin | 2024-11-20 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| calendar.php in vBulletin before 2.2.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in the command parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2002-0061 | 1 Apache | 1 Http Server | 2024-11-20 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Apache for Win32 before 1.3.24, and 2.0.x before 2.0.34-beta, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters (a | pipe character) provided as arguments to batch (.bat) or .cmd scripts, which are sent unfiltered to the shell interpreter, typically cmd.exe. | |||||
| CVE-2001-1583 | 1 Sun | 1 Sunos | 2024-11-20 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| lpd daemon (in.lpd) in Solaris 8 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a job request with a crafted control file that is not properly handled when lpd invokes a mail program. NOTE: this might be the same vulnerability as CVE-2000-1220. | |||||
| CVE-1999-0067 | 2 Apache, Ncsa | 2 Http Server, Ncsa Httpd | 2024-11-20 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| phf CGI program allows remote command execution through shell metacharacters. | |||||
| CVE-1999-0043 | 6 Bsdi, Caldera, Isc and 3 more | 7 Bsd Os, Openlinux, Inn and 4 more | 2024-11-20 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Command execution via shell metachars in INN daemon (innd) 1.5 using "newgroup" and "rmgroup" control messages, and others. | |||||
| CVE-2024-52587 | 2024-11-19 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH | ||
| StepSecurity's Harden-Runner provides network egress filtering and runtime security for GitHub-hosted and self-hosted runners. Versions of step-security/harden-runner prior to v2.10.2 contain multiple command injection weaknesses via environment variables that could potentially be exploited under specific conditions. However, due to the current execution order of pre-steps in GitHub Actions and the placement of harden-runner as the first step in a job, the likelihood of exploitation is low as the Harden-Runner action reads the environment variable during the pre-step stage. There are no known exploits at this time. Version 2.10.2 contains a patch. | |||||
| CVE-2024-51503 | 2024-11-19 | N/A | 8.0 HIGH | ||
| A security agent manual scan command injection vulnerability in the Trend Micro Deep Security 20 Agent could allow an attacker to escalate privileges and execute arbitrary code on an affected machine. In certain circumstances, attackers that have legitimate access to the domain may be able to remotely inject commands to other machines in the same domain. Please note: an attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability locally and must have domain user privileges to affect other machines. | |||||
| CVE-2024-11003 | 2024-11-19 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH | ||
| Qualys discovered that needrestart, before version 3.8, passes unsanitized data to a library (Modules::ScanDeps) which expects safe input. This could allow a local attacker to execute arbitrary shell commands. Please see the related CVE-2024-10224 in Modules::ScanDeps. | |||||
| CVE-2024-9474 | 1 Paloaltonetworks | 1 Pan-os | 2024-11-19 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH |
| A privilege escalation vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS software allows a PAN-OS administrator with access to the management web interface to perform actions on the firewall with root privileges. Cloud NGFW and Prisma Access are not impacted by this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2022-1884 | 2 Gogs, Microsoft | 2 Gogs, Windows | 2024-11-19 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A remote command execution vulnerability exists in gogs/gogs versions <=0.12.7 when deployed on a Windows server. The vulnerability arises due to improper validation of the `tree_path` parameter during file uploads. An attacker can set `tree_path=.git.` to upload a file into the .git directory, allowing them to write or rewrite the `.git/config` file. If the `core.sshCommand` is set, this can lead to remote command execution. | |||||
| CVE-2024-4343 | 2024-11-18 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL | ||
| A Python command injection vulnerability exists in the `SagemakerLLM` class's `complete()` method within `./private_gpt/components/llm/custom/sagemaker.py` of the imartinez/privategpt application, versions up to and including 0.3.0. The vulnerability arises due to the use of the `eval()` function to parse a string received from a remote AWS SageMaker LLM endpoint into a dictionary. This method of parsing is unsafe as it can execute arbitrary Python code contained within the response. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by manipulating the response from the AWS SageMaker LLM endpoint to include malicious Python code, leading to potential execution of arbitrary commands on the system hosting the application. The issue is fixed in version 0.6.0. | |||||
| CVE-2022-20652 | 2024-11-18 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM | ||
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface and in the API subsystem of Cisco Tetration could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to inject arbitrary commands to be executed with root-level privileges on the underlying operating system. This vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by submitting a crafted HTTP message to the affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute commands with root-level privileges. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would need valid administrator-level credentials.Cisco has released software updates that address this vulnerability. There are no workarounds that address this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2022-20655 | 2024-11-18 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH | ||
| A vulnerability in the implementation of the CLI on a device that is running ConfD could allow an authenticated, local attacker to perform a command injection attack. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of a process argument on an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by injecting commands during the execution of this process. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system with the privilege level of ConfD, which is commonly root. | |||||
| CVE-2022-20871 | 2024-11-18 | N/A | 6.3 MEDIUM | ||
| A vulnerability in the web management interface of Cisco AsyncOS for Cisco Secure Web Appliance, formerly Cisco Web Security Appliance (WSA), could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to perform a command injection and elevate privileges to root. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input for the web interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by authenticating to the system and sending a crafted HTTP packet to the affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system and elevate privileges to root. To successfully exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would need at least read-only credentials.Cisco has released software updates that address this vulnerability. There are no workarounds that address this vulnerability.Attention: Simplifying the Cisco portfolio includes the renaming of security products under one brand: Cisco Secure. For more information, see . | |||||
| CVE-2023-20036 | 2024-11-18 | N/A | 9.9 CRITICAL | ||
| A vulnerability in the web UI of Cisco IND could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands with administrative privileges on the underlying operating system of an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper input validation when uploading a Device Pack. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by altering the request that is sent when uploading a Device Pack. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary commands as NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM on the underlying operating system of an affected device. Cisco has released software updates that address this vulnerability. There are no workarounds that address this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2024-50809 | 2024-11-18 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH | ||
| The theme.php file in SDCMS 2.8 has a command execution vulnerability that allows for the execution of system commands | |||||