Total
426 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-43074 | 1 Fortinet | 4 Fortios, Fortiproxy, Fortiswitch and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| An improper verification of cryptographic signature vulnerability [CWE-347] in FortiWeb 6.4 all versions, 6.3.16 and below, 6.2 all versions, 6.1 all versions, 6.0 all versions; FortiOS 7.0.3 and below, 6.4.8 and below, 6.2 all versions, 6.0 all versions; FortiSwitch 7.0.3 and below, 6.4.10 and below, 6.2 all versions, 6.0 all versions; FortiProxy 7.0.1 and below, 2.0.7 and below, 1.2 all versions, 1.1 all versions, 1.0 all versions may allow an attacker to decrypt portions of the administrative session management cookie if able to intercept the latter. | |||||
| CVE-2021-41832 | 1 Apache | 1 Openoffice | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| It is possible for an attacker to manipulate documents to appear to be signed by a trusted source. All versions of Apache OpenOffice up to 4.1.10 are affected. Users are advised to update to version 4.1.11. See CVE-2021-25635 for the LibreOffice advisory. | |||||
| CVE-2021-41831 | 1 Apache | 1 Openoffice | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| It is possible for an attacker to manipulate the timestamp of signed documents. All versions of Apache OpenOffice up to 4.1.10 are affected. Users are advised to update to version 4.1.11. See CVE-2021-25634 for the LibreOffice advisory. | |||||
| CVE-2021-41830 | 1 Apache | 1 Openoffice | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| It is possible for an attacker to manipulate signed documents and macros to appear to come from a trusted source. All versions of Apache OpenOffice up to 4.1.10 are affected. Users are advised to update to version 4.1.11. See CVE-2021-25633 for the LibreOffice advisory. | |||||
| CVE-2021-40326 | 2 Foxit, Microsoft | 4 Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader, Phantompdf and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| Foxit PDF Reader before 11.1 and PDF Editor before 11.1, and PhantomPDF before 10.1.6, mishandle hidden and incremental data in signed documents. An attacker can write to an arbitrary file, and display controlled contents, during signature verification. | |||||
| CVE-2021-40045 | 1 Huawei | 3 Emui, Harmonyos, Magic Ui | 2024-11-21 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| There is a vulnerability of signature verification mechanism failure in system upgrade through recovery mode.Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect service confidentiality. | |||||
| CVE-2021-3680 | 1 Showdoc | 1 Showdoc | 2024-11-21 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.9 MEDIUM |
| showdoc is vulnerable to Missing Cryptographic Step | |||||
| CVE-2021-3521 | 1 Rpm | 1 Rpm | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 4.7 MEDIUM |
| There is a flaw in RPM's signature functionality. OpenPGP subkeys are associated with a primary key via a "binding signature." RPM does not check the binding signature of subkeys prior to importing them. If an attacker is able to add or socially engineer another party to add a malicious subkey to a legitimate public key, RPM could wrongly trust a malicious signature. The greatest impact of this flaw is to data integrity. To exploit this flaw, an attacker must either compromise an RPM repository or convince an administrator to install an untrusted RPM or public key. It is strongly recommended to only use RPMs and public keys from trusted sources. | |||||
| CVE-2021-3445 | 3 Fedoraproject, Redhat, Rpm | 3 Fedora, Enterprise Linux, Libdnf | 2024-11-21 | 5.1 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A flaw was found in libdnf's signature verification functionality in versions before 0.60.1. This flaw allows an attacker to achieve code execution if they can alter the header information of an RPM package and then trick a user or system into installing it. The highest risk of this vulnerability is to confidentiality, integrity, as well as system availability. | |||||
| CVE-2021-3421 | 3 Fedoraproject, Redhat, Rpm | 3 Fedora, Enterprise Linux, Rpm | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in the RPM package in the read functionality. This flaw allows an attacker who can convince a victim to install a seemingly verifiable package or compromise an RPM repository, to cause RPM database corruption. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data integrity. This flaw affects RPM versions before 4.17.0-alpha. | |||||
| CVE-2021-3196 | 1 Hitachi | 1 Id Bravura Security Fabric | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Hitachi ID Bravura Security Fabric 11.0.0 through 11.1.3, 12.0.0 through 12.0.2, and 12.1.0. When using federated identity management (authenticating via SAML through a third-party identity provider), an attacker can inject additional data into a signed SAML response being transmitted to the service provider (ID Bravura Security Fabric). The application successfully validates the signed values but uses the unsigned malicious values. An attacker with lower-privilege access to the application can inject the username of a high-privilege user to impersonate that user. | |||||
| CVE-2021-3051 | 1 Paloaltonetworks | 1 Cortex Xsoar | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| An improper verification of cryptographic signature vulnerability exists in Cortex XSOAR SAML authentication that enables an unauthenticated network-based attacker with specific knowledge of the Cortex XSOAR instance to access protected resources and perform unauthorized actions on the Cortex XSOAR server. This issue impacts: Cortex XSOAR 5.5.0 builds earlier than 1578677; Cortex XSOAR 6.0.2 builds earlier than 1576452; Cortex XSOAR 6.1.0 builds earlier than 1578663; Cortex XSOAR 6.2.0 builds earlier than 1578666. All Cortex XSOAR instances hosted by Palo Alto Networks are protected from this vulnerability; no additional action is required for these instances. | |||||
| CVE-2021-3033 | 1 Paloaltonetworks | 1 Prisma Cloud | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| An improper verification of cryptographic signature vulnerability exists in the Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud Compute console. This vulnerability enables an attacker to bypass signature validation during SAML authentication by logging in to the Prisma Cloud Compute console as any authorized user. This issue impacts: All versions of Prisma Cloud Compute 19.11, Prisma Cloud Compute 20.04, and Prisma Cloud Compute 20.09; Prisma Cloud Compute 20.12 before update 1. Prisma Cloud Compute SaaS version is not impacted by this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2021-39909 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2024-11-21 | 3.5 LOW | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Lack of email address ownership verification in the CODEOWNERS feature in all versions of GitLab EE starting from 11.3 before 14.2.6, all versions starting from 14.3 before 14.3.4, and all versions starting from 14.4 before 14.4.1 allows an attacker to bypass CODEOWNERS Merge Request approval requirement under rare circumstances | |||||
| CVE-2021-38195 | 1 Parity | 1 Libsecp256k1 | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in the libsecp256k1 crate before 0.5.0 for Rust. It can verify an invalid signature because it allows the R or S parameter to be larger than the curve order, aka an overflow. | |||||
| CVE-2021-37927 | 1 Zohocorp | 1 Manageengine Admanager Plus | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Zoho ManageEngine ADManager Plus version 7110 and prior allows account takeover via SSO. | |||||
| CVE-2021-37160 | 1 Swisslog-healthcare | 2 Hmi-3 Control Panel, Hmi-3 Control Panel Firmware | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A firmware validation issue was discovered in HMI3 Control Panel in Swisslog Healthcare Nexus Panel operated by released versions of software before Nexus Software 7.2.5.7. There is no firmware validation (e.g., cryptographic signature validation) during a File Upload for a firmware update. | |||||
| CVE-2021-37127 | 1 Huawei | 4 Imanager Neteco, Imanager Neteco 6000, Imanager Neteco 6000 Firmware and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 9.0 HIGH | 7.2 HIGH |
| There is a signature management vulnerability in some huawei products. An attacker can forge signature and bypass the signature check. During firmware update process, successful exploit this vulnerability can cause the forged system file overwrite the correct system file. Affected product versions include:iManager NetEco V600R010C00CP2001,V600R010C00CP2002,V600R010C00SPC100,V600R010C00SPC110,V600R010C00SPC120,V600R010C00SPC200,V600R010C00SPC210,V600R010C00SPC300;iManager NetEco 6000 V600R009C00SPC100,V600R009C00SPC110,V600R009C00SPC120,V600R009C00SPC190,V600R009C00SPC200,V600R009C00SPC201,V600R009C00SPC202,V600R009C00SPC210. | |||||
| CVE-2021-36277 | 1 Dell | 3 Alienware Command Center Application, Command \| Update, Update\/alienware Update | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Dell Command | Update, Dell Update, and Alienware Update versions before 4.3 contains an Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature Vulnerability. A local authenticated malicious user may exploit this vulnerability by executing arbitrary code on the system. | |||||
| CVE-2021-36226 | 1 Westerndigital | 2 My Cloud Os, My Cloud Pr4100 | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Western Digital My Cloud devices before OS5 do not use cryptographically signed Firmware upgrade files. | |||||