Total
2447 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2012-6661 | 2 Plone, Zope | 2 Plone, Zope | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Zope before 2.13.19, as used in Plone before 4.2.3 and 4.3 before beta 1, does not reseed the pseudo-random number generator (PRNG), which makes it easier for remote attackers to guess the value via unspecified vectors. NOTE: this issue was SPLIT from CVE-2012-5508 due to different vulnerability types (ADT2). | |||||
| CVE-2012-6606 | 1 Paloaltonetworks | 2 Globalprotect, Netconnect | 2024-11-21 | 5.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Palo Alto Networks GlobalProtect before 1.1.7, and NetConnect, does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof portal servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate. | |||||
| CVE-2012-6580 | 1 Bestpractical | 1 Request Tracker | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Best Practical Solutions RT 3.8.x before 3.8.15 and 4.0.x before 4.0.8, when GnuPG is enabled, does not ensure that the UI labels unencrypted messages as unencrypted, which might make it easier for remote attackers to spoof details of a message's origin or interfere with encryption-policy auditing via an e-mail message to a queue's address. | |||||
| CVE-2012-6579 | 1 Bestpractical | 1 Request Tracker | 2024-11-21 | 6.4 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Best Practical Solutions RT 3.8.x before 3.8.15 and 4.0.x before 4.0.8, when GnuPG is enabled, allows remote attackers to configure encryption or signing for certain outbound e-mail, and possibly cause a denial of service (loss of e-mail readability), via an e-mail message to a queue's address. | |||||
| CVE-2012-6578 | 1 Bestpractical | 1 Request Tracker | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Best Practical Solutions RT 3.8.x before 3.8.15 and 4.0.x before 4.0.8, when GnuPG is enabled with a "Sign by default" queue configuration, uses a queue's key for signing, which might allow remote attackers to spoof messages by leveraging the lack of authentication semantics. | |||||
| CVE-2012-6571 | 1 Huawei | 18 Ar 18-1x, Ar 18-2x, Ar 18-3x and 15 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| The HTTP module in the (1) Branch Intelligent Management System (BIMS) and (2) web management components on Huawei AR routers and S2000, S3000, S3500, S3900, S5100, S5600, and S7800 switches uses predictable Session ID values, which makes it easier for remote attackers to hijack sessions via a brute-force attack. | |||||
| CVE-2012-6371 | 1 Belkin | 1 N900 Wireless Router | 2024-11-21 | 3.3 LOW | N/A |
| The WPA2 implementation on the Belkin N900 F9K1104v1 router establishes a WPS PIN based on 6 digits of the LAN/WLAN MAC address, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain access to a Wi-Fi network by reading broadcast packets, a different vulnerability than CVE-2012-4366. | |||||
| CVE-2012-6107 | 1 Apache | 1 Apache Axis2\/c | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Apache Axis2/C does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate. | |||||
| CVE-2012-6093 | 3 Canonical, Opensuse, Qt | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Opensuse, Qt | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The QSslSocket::sslErrors function in Qt before 4.6.5, 4.7.x before 4.7.6, 4.8.x before 4.8.5, when using certain versions of openSSL, uses an "incompatible structure layout" that can read memory from the wrong location, which causes Qt to report an incorrect error when certificate validation fails and might cause users to make unsafe security decisions to accept a certificate. | |||||
| CVE-2012-6086 | 1 Zabbix | 1 Zabbix | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| libs/zbxmedia/eztexting.c in Zabbix 1.8.x before 1.8.18rc1, 2.0.x before 2.0.8rc1, and 2.1.x before 2.1.2 does not properly set the CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYHOST option for libcurl, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate. | |||||
| CVE-2012-6051 | 1 Google | 1 Cityhash | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Google CityHash computes hash values without properly restricting the ability to trigger hash collisions predictably, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via crafted input to an application that maintains a hash table, as demonstrated by a universal multicollision attack. | |||||
| CVE-2012-5936 | 1 Ibm | 2 Sterling B2b Integrator, Sterling File Gateway | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 do not set the secure flag for the session cookie in an https session, which makes it easier for remote attackers to capture this cookie by intercepting its transmission within an http session. | |||||
| CVE-2012-5862 | 1 Sinapsitech | 4 Esolar Duo Photovoltaic System Monitor, Esolar Light Photovoltaic System Monitor, Esolar Photovoltaic System Monitor and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| login.php on the Sinapsi eSolar Light Photovoltaic System Monitor (aka Schneider Electric Ezylog photovoltaic SCADA management server), Sinapsi eSolar, and Sinapsi eSolar DUO with firmware before 2.0.2870_2.2.12 establishes multiple hardcoded accounts, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain administrative access by leveraging a (1) cleartext password or (2) password hash contained in this script, as demonstrated by a password of astridservice or 36e44c9b64. | |||||
| CVE-2012-5811 | 1 Breezy | 1 Breezy | 2024-11-21 | 5.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The Breezy application for Android does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate. | |||||
| CVE-2012-5809 | 1 Groupon | 1 Groupon Merchants | 2024-11-21 | 5.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The Groupon Redemptions application for Android does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate. | |||||
| CVE-2012-5756 | 1 Ibm | 1 Websphere Datapower Xc10 Appliance | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The IBM WebSphere DataPower XC10 Appliance 2.0.0.0 through 2.0.0.3 and 2.1.0.0 through 2.1.0.2, when a collective configuration is enabled, has a single secret key that is shared across different customers' installations, which allows remote attackers to spoof a container server by (1) sniffing the network to locate a cleartext transmission of this key or (2) leveraging knowledge of this key from another installation. | |||||
| CVE-2012-5662 | 1 Paul Mattes | 1 X3270 | 2024-11-21 | 5.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| x3270 before 3.3.12ga12 does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate. | |||||
| CVE-2012-5658 | 1 Redhat | 2 Openshift, Openshift Origin | 2024-11-21 | 2.1 LOW | N/A |
| rhc-chk.rb in Red Hat OpenShift Origin before 1.1, when -d (debug mode) is used, outputs the password and other sensitive information in cleartext, which allows context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information, as demonstrated by including log files or Bugzilla reports in support channels. | |||||
| CVE-2012-5583 | 1 Apereo | 1 Phpcas | 2024-11-21 | 5.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| phpCAS before 1.3.2 does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate. | |||||
| CVE-2012-5575 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 6 Cxf, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Portal Platform and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.4 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Apache CXF 2.5.x before 2.5.10, 2.6.x before CXF 2.6.7, and 2.7.x before CXF 2.7.4 does not verify that a specified cryptographic algorithm is allowed by the WS-SecurityPolicy AlgorithmSuite definition before decrypting, which allows remote attackers to force CXF to use weaker cryptographic algorithms than intended and makes it easier to decrypt communications, aka "XML Encryption backwards compatibility attack." | |||||