Total
1039 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-31872 | 2024-09-20 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
| IBM Security Verify Access Appliance 10.0.0 through 10.0.7 could allow a malicious actor to conduct a man in the middle attack when deploying Open Source scripts due to missing certificate validation. IBM X-Force ID: 287316. | |||||
| CVE-2024-31489 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlient | 2024-09-20 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| AAn improper certificate validation vulnerability [CWE-295] in FortiClientWindows 7.2.0 through 7.2.2, 7.0.0 through 7.0.11, FortiClientLinux 7.2.0, 7.0.0 through 7.0.11 and FortiClientMac 7.0.0 through 7.0.11, 7.2.0 through 7.2.4 may allow a remote and unauthenticated attacker to perform a Man-in-the-Middle attack on the communication channel between the FortiGate and the FortiClient during the ZTNA tunnel creation | |||||
| CVE-2023-47742 | 2024-09-20 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM | ||
| IBM QRadar Suite Products 1.10.12.0 through 1.10.18.0 and IBM Cloud Pak for Security 1.10.0.0 through 1.10.11.0 could disclose sensitive information using man in the middle techniques due to not correctly enforcing all aspects of certificate validation in some circumstances. IBM X-Force ID: 272533. | |||||
| CVE-2024-45159 | 1 Arm | 1 Mbed Tls | 2024-09-19 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS 3.x before 3.6.1. With TLS 1.3, when a server enables optional authentication of the client, if the client-provided certificate does not have appropriate values in if keyUsage or extKeyUsage extensions, then the return value of mbedtls_ssl_get_verify_result() would incorrectly have the MBEDTLS_X509_BADCERT_KEY_USAGE and MBEDTLS_X509_BADCERT_KEY_USAGE bits clear. As a result, an attacker that had a certificate valid for uses other than TLS client authentication would nonetheless be able to use it for TLS client authentication. Only TLS 1.3 servers were affected, and only with optional authentication (with required authentication, the handshake would be aborted with a fatal alert). | |||||
| CVE-2023-50178 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiadc | 2024-09-19 | N/A | 7.4 HIGH |
| An improper certificate validation vulnerability [CWE-295] in FortiADC 7.4.0, 7.2.0 through 7.2.3, 7.1 all versions, 7.0 all versions, 6.2 all versions, 6.1 all versions and 6.0 all versions may allow a remote and unauthenticated attacker to perform a Man-in-the-Middle attack on the communication channel between the device and various remote servers such as private SDN connectors and FortiToken Cloud. | |||||
| CVE-2022-22549 | 1 Dell | 1 Emc Powerscale Onefs | 2024-09-16 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Dell PowerScale OneFS, 8.2.x-9.3.x, contains a Improper Certificate Validation. A unauthenticated remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to a man-in-the-middle capture of administrative credentials. | |||||
| CVE-2020-7922 | 1 Mongodb | 1 Mongodb Enterprise Kubernetes Operator | 2024-09-16 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| X.509 certificates generated by the MongoDB Enterprise Kubernetes Operator may allow an attacker with access to the Kubernetes cluster improper access to MongoDB instances. Customers who do not use X.509 authentication, and those who do not use the Operator to generate their X.509 certificates are unaffected. This issue affects MongoDB Enterprise Kubernetes Operator version 1.0, MongoDB Enterprise Kubernetes Operator version 1.1, MongoDB Enterprise Kubernetes Operator version 1.2 versions prior to 1.2.4, MongoDB Enterprise Kubernetes Operator version 1.3 versions prior to 1.3.1, 1.2, 1.4 versions prior to 1.4.4. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20327 | 1 Mongodb | 1 Libmongocrypt | 2024-09-16 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| A specific version of the Node.js mongodb-client-encryption module does not perform correct validation of the KMS server’s certificate. This vulnerability in combination with a privileged network position active MITM attack could result in interception of traffic between the Node.js driver and the KMS service rendering client-side field level encryption (CSFLE) ineffective. This issue was discovered during internal testing and affects mongodb-client-encryption module version 1.2.0, which was available from 2021-Jan-29 and deprecated in the NPM Registry on 2021-Feb-04. This vulnerability does not impact driver traffic payloads with CSFLE-supported key services from applications residing inside the AWS, GCP, and Azure nework fabrics due to compensating controls in these environments. This issue does not impact driver workloads that don’t use Field Level Encryption. This issue affect MongoDB Node.js Driver mongodb-client-encryption module version 1.2.0 | |||||
| CVE-2021-20328 | 2 Mongodb, Quarkus | 2 Java Driver, Quarkus | 2024-09-16 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| Specific versions of the Java driver that support client-side field level encryption (CSFLE) fail to perform correct host name verification on the KMS server’s certificate. This vulnerability in combination with a privileged network position active MITM attack could result in interception of traffic between the Java driver and the KMS service rendering Field Level Encryption ineffective. This issue was discovered during internal testing and affects all versions of the Java driver that support CSFLE. The Java async, Scala, and reactive streams drivers are not impacted. This vulnerability does not impact driver traffic payloads with CSFLE-supported key services originating from applications residing inside the AWS, GCP, and Azure network fabrics due to compensating controls in these environments. This issue does not impact driver workloads that don’t use Field Level Encryption. | |||||
| CVE-2020-5367 | 1 Dell | 3 Emc Unisphere For Powermax, Emc Unisphere For Powermax Virtual Appliance, Powermax Os | 2024-09-16 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Dell EMC Unisphere for PowerMax versions prior to 9.1.0.17, Dell EMC Unisphere for PowerMax Virtual Appliance versions prior to 9.1.0.17, and PowerMax OS Release 5978 contain an improper certificate validation vulnerability. An unauthenticated remote attacker may potentially exploit this vulnerability to carry out a man-in-the-middle attack by supplying a crafted certificate and intercepting the victim's traffic to view or modify a victim's data in transit. | |||||
| CVE-2020-7924 | 1 Mongodb | 2 Database Tools, Mongomirror | 2024-09-16 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Usage of specific command line parameter in MongoDB Tools which was originally intended to just skip hostname checks, may result in MongoDB skipping all certificate validation. This may result in accepting invalid certificates.This issue affects: MongoDB Inc. MongoDB Database Tools 3.6 versions later than 3.6.5; 3.6 versions prior to 3.6.21; 4.0 versions prior to 4.0.21; 4.2 versions prior to 4.2.11; 100 versions prior to 100.2.0. MongoDB Inc. Mongomirror 0 versions later than 0.6.0. | |||||
| CVE-2024-38642 | 1 Qnap | 1 Qumagie | 2024-09-16 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| An improper certificate validation vulnerability has been reported to affect QuMagie. If exploited, the vulnerability could allow local network users to compromise the security of the system via unspecified vectors. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version: QuMagie 2.3.1 and later | |||||
| CVE-2024-8096 | 2024-09-11 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM | ||
| When curl is told to use the Certificate Status Request TLS extension, often referred to as OCSP stapling, to verify that the server certificate is valid, it might fail to detect some OCSP problems and instead wrongly consider the response as fine. If the returned status reports another error than 'revoked' (like for example 'unauthorized') it is not treated as a bad certficate. | |||||
| CVE-2023-50315 | 1 Ibm | 1 Websphere Application Server | 2024-09-11 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5 and 9.0 could allow an attacker with access to the network to conduct spoofing attacks. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability using a certificate issued by a trusted authority to obtain sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 274714. | |||||
| CVE-2024-33509 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiweb | 2024-09-09 | N/A | 4.8 MEDIUM |
| An improper certificate validation vulnerability [CWE-295] in FortiWeb 7.2.0 through 7.2.1, 7.0 all versions, 6.4 all versions and 6.3 all versions may allow a remote and unauthenticated attacker in a Man-in-the-Middle position to decipher and/or tamper with the communication channel between the device and different endpoints used to fetch data for Web Application Firewall (WAF). | |||||
| CVE-2023-50179 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiadc | 2024-09-09 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| An improper certificate validation vulnerability [CWE-295] in FortiADC 7.4.0, 7.2 all versions, 7.1 all versions, 7.0 all versions may allow a remote and unauthenticated attacker to perform a Man-in-the-Middle attack on the communication channel between the device and public SDN connectors. | |||||
| CVE-2024-40714 | 2024-09-09 | N/A | 8.3 HIGH | ||
| An improper certificate validation vulnerability in TLS certificate validation allows an attacker on the same network to intercept sensitive credentials during restore operations. | |||||
| CVE-2024-7570 | 1 Ivanti | 1 Neurons For Itsm | 2024-09-06 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| Improper certificate validation in Ivanti ITSM on-prem and Neurons for ITSM Versions 2023.4 and earlier allows a remote attacker in a MITM position to craft a token that would allow access to ITSM as any user. | |||||
| CVE-2023-38325 | 1 Cryptography.io | 1 Cryptography | 2024-09-05 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| The cryptography package before 41.0.2 for Python mishandles SSH certificates that have critical options. | |||||
| CVE-2024-25140 | 2 Microsoft, Rustdesk | 2 Windows, Rustdesk | 2024-08-29 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A default installation of RustDesk 1.2.3 on Windows places a WDKTestCert certificate under Trusted Root Certification Authorities with Enhanced Key Usage of Code Signing (1.3.6.1.5.5.7.3.3), valid from 2023 until 2033. This is potentially unwanted, e.g., because there is no public documentation of security measures for the private key, and arbitrary software could be signed if the private key were to be compromised. NOTE: the vendor's position is "we do not have EV cert, so we use test cert as a workaround." Insertion into Trusted Root Certification Authorities was the originally intended behavior, and the UI ensured that the certificate installation step (checked by default) was visible to the user before proceeding with the product installation. | |||||