Total
284 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2013-5661 | 4 Isc, Nic, Nlnetlabs and 1 more | 4 Bind, Knot Resolver, Nsd and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 2.6 LOW | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| Cache Poisoning issue exists in DNS Response Rate Limiting. | |||||
| CVE-2009-1048 | 1 Snom | 10 Snom 300, Snom 300 Firmware, Snom 320 and 7 more | 2024-11-21 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The web interface on the snom VoIP phones snom 300, snom 320, snom 360, snom 370, and snom 820 with firmware 6.5 before 6.5.20, 7.1 before 7.1.39, and 7.3 before 7.3.14 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication, and reconfigure the phone or make arbitrary use of the phone, via a (1) http or (2) https request with 127.0.0.1 in the Host header. | |||||
| CVE-2024-8935 | 2024-11-13 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
| CWE-290: Authentication Bypass by Spoofing vulnerability exists that could cause a denial of service and loss of confidentiality and integrity of controllers when conducting a Man-In-The-Middle attack between the controller and the engineering workstation while a valid user is establishing a communication session. This vulnerability is inherent to Diffie Hellman algorithm which does not protect against Man-In-The-Middle attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2024-45397 | 1 Dena | 1 H2o | 2024-11-12 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| h2o is an HTTP server with support for HTTP/1.x, HTTP/2 and HTTP/3. When an HTTP request using TLS/1.3 early data on top of TCP Fast Open or QUIC 0-RTT packets is received and the IP-address-based access control is used, the access control does not detect and prohibit HTTP requests conveyed by packets with a spoofed source address. This behavior allows attackers on the network to execute HTTP requests from addresses that are otherwise rejected by the address-based access control. The vulnerability has been addressed in commit 15ed15a. Users may disable the use of TCP FastOpen and QUIC to mitigate the issue. | |||||
| CVE-2024-39341 | 2024-11-04 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM | ||
| Entrust Instant Financial Issuance (On Premise) Software (formerly known as Cardwizard) 6.10.0, 6.9.0, 6.9.1, 6.9.2, and 6.8.x and earlier leaves behind a configuration file (i.e. WebAPI.cfg.xml) after the installation process. This file can be accessed without authentication on HTTP port 80 by guessing the correct IIS webroot path. It includes system configuration parameter names and values with sensitive configuration values encrypted. | |||||
| CVE-2024-10462 | 1 Mozilla | 2 Firefox, Thunderbird | 2024-11-04 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Truncation of a long URL could have allowed origin spoofing in a permission prompt. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 132, Firefox ESR < 128.4, Thunderbird < 128.4, and Thunderbird < 132. | |||||
| CVE-2024-10465 | 1 Mozilla | 2 Firefox, Thunderbird | 2024-11-04 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A clipboard "paste" button could persist across tabs which allowed a spoofing attack. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 132, Firefox ESR < 128.4, Thunderbird < 128.4, and Thunderbird < 132. | |||||
| CVE-2024-8386 | 1 Mozilla | 2 Firefox, Firefox Esr | 2024-10-30 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| If a site had been granted the permission to open popup windows, it could cause Select elements to appear on top of another site to perform a spoofing attack. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 130, Firefox ESR < 128.2, and Thunderbird < 128.2. | |||||
| CVE-2024-49214 | 2024-10-29 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM | ||
| QUIC in HAProxy 3.1.x before 3.1-dev7, 3.0.x before 3.0.5, and 2.9.x before 2.9.11 allows opening a 0-RTT session with a spoofed IP address. This can bypass the IP allow/block list functionality. | |||||
| CVE-2024-20299 | 2024-10-25 | N/A | 5.8 MEDIUM | ||
| A vulnerability in the AnyConnect firewall for Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass a configured access control list (ACL) and allow traffic that should have been denied to flow through an affected device. This vulnerability is due to a logic error in populating group ACLs when an AnyConnect client establishes a new session toward an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by establishing an AnyConnect connection to the affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass configured ACL rules. | |||||
| CVE-2024-20297 | 2024-10-25 | N/A | 5.8 MEDIUM | ||
| A vulnerability in the AnyConnect firewall for Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass a configured access control list (ACL) and allow traffic that should have been denied to flow through an affected device. This vulnerability is due to a logic error in populating group ACLs when an AnyConnect client establishes a new session toward an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by establishing an AnyConnect connection to the affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass configured ACL rules. | |||||
| CVE-2024-20384 | 2024-10-25 | N/A | 5.8 MEDIUM | ||
| A vulnerability in the Network Service Group (NSG) feature of Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass a configured access control list (ACL) and allow traffic that should be denied to flow through an affected device. This vulnerability is due to a logic error that occurs when NSG ACLs are populated on an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by establishing a connection to the affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass configured ACL rules. | |||||
| CVE-2024-8901 | 2024-10-23 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
| The AWS ALB Route Directive Adapter For Istio repo https://github.com/awslabs/aws-alb-route-directive-adapter-for-istio/tree/master provides an OIDC authentication mechanism that was integrated into the open source Kubeflow project. The adapter uses JWT for authentication, but lacks proper signer and issuer validation. In deployments of ALB that ignore security best practices, where ALB targets are directly exposed to internet traffic, an actor can provide a JWT signed by an untrusted entity in order to spoof OIDC-federated sessions and successfully bypass authentication. The repository/package has been deprecated, is end of life, and is no longer supported. As a security best practice, ensure that your ELB targets (e.g. EC2 Instances, Fargate Tasks etc.) do not have public IP addresses. Ensure any forked or derivative code validate that the signer attribute in the JWT match the ARN of the Application Load Balancer that the service is configured to use. | |||||
| CVE-2024-10125 | 2024-10-23 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
| The Amazon.ApplicationLoadBalancer.Identity.AspNetCore repo https://github.com/awslabs/aws-alb-identity-aspnetcore#validatetokensignature contains Middleware that can be used in conjunction with the Application Load Balancer (ALB) OpenId Connect integration and can be used in any ASP.NET https://dotnet.microsoft.com/apps/aspnet Core deployment scenario, including Fargate, EKS, ECS, EC2, and Lambda. In the JWT handling code, it performs signature validation but fails to validate the JWT issuer and signer identity. The signer omission, if combined with a scenario where the infrastructure owner allows internet traffic to the ALB targets (not a recommended configuration), can allow for JWT signing by an untrusted entity and an actor may be able to mimic valid OIDC-federated sessions to the ALB targets. The repository/package has been deprecated, is end of life, and is no longer supported. As a security best practice, ensure that your ELB targets (e.g. EC2 Instances, Fargate Tasks etc.) do not have public IP addresses. Ensure any forked or derivative code validate that the signer attribute in the JWT match the ARN of the Application Load Balancer that the service is configured to use. | |||||
| CVE-2024-49193 | 2024-10-16 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
| Zendesk before 2024-07-02 allows remote attackers to read ticket history via e-mail spoofing, because Cc fields are extracted from incoming e-mail messages and used to grant additional authorization for ticket viewing, the mechanism for detecting spoofed e-mail messages is insufficient, and the support e-mail addresses associated with individual tickets are predictable. | |||||
| CVE-2024-46957 | 2024-09-26 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL | ||
| Mellium mellium.im/xmpp 0.0.1 through 0.21.4 allows response spoofing if the implementation uses predictable IDs because the stanza type is not checked. This is fixed in 0.22.0. | |||||
| CVE-2024-45453 | 2024-09-26 | N/A | 3.7 LOW | ||
| Authentication Bypass by Spoofing vulnerability in Peter Hardy-vanDoorn Maintenance Redirect allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Maintenance Redirect: from n/a through 2.0.1. | |||||
| CVE-2023-30464 | 2024-09-20 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
| CoreDNS through 1.10.1 enables attackers to achieve DNS cache poisoning and inject fake responses via a birthday attack. | |||||
| CVE-2024-44104 | 1 Ivanti | 1 Workspace Control | 2024-09-18 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| An incorrectly implemented authentication scheme that is subjected to a spoofing attack in the management console of Ivanti Workspace Control version 10.18.0.0 and below allows a local authenticated attacker to escalate their privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2024-42364 | 1 Gethomepage | 1 Homepage | 2024-09-12 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Homepage is a highly customizable homepage with Docker and service API integrations. The default setup of homepage 0.9.1 is vulnerable to DNS rebinding. Homepage is setup without certificate and authentication by default, leaving it to vulnerable to DNS rebinding. In this attack, an attacker will ask a user to visit his/her website. The attacker website will then change the DNS records of their domain from their IP address to the internal IP address of the homepage instance. To tell which IP addresses are valid, we can rebind a subdomain to each IP address we want to check, and see if there is a response. Once potential candidates have been found, the attacker can launch the attack by reading the response of the webserver after the IP address has changed. When the attacker domain is fetched, the response will be from the homepage instance, not the attacker website, because the IP address has been changed. Due to a lack of authentication, a user’s private information such as API keys (fixed after first report) and other private information can then be extracted by the attacker website. | |||||