Total
134 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-20686 | 1 Cisco | 6 Ata 190, Ata 190 Firmware, Ata 191 and 3 more | 2024-02-28 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Multiple vulnerabilities in the Link Layer Discovery Protocol (LLDP) functionality of Cisco ATA 190 Series Analog Telephone Adapter firmware could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on an affected device and cause the LLDP service to restart. These vulnerabilities are due to missing length validation of certain LLDP packet header fields. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending a malicious LLDP packet to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute code on the affected device and cause LLDP to restart unexpectedly, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. | |||||
| CVE-2021-28510 | 1 Arista | 77 7020r, 7050cx3-32s, 7050cx3m-32s and 74 more | 2024-02-28 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| For certain systems running EOS, a Precision Time Protocol (PTP) packet of a management/signaling message with an invalid Type-Length-Value (TLV) causes the PTP agent to restart. Repeated restarts of the service will make the service unavailable. | |||||
| CVE-2022-20690 | 1 Cisco | 6 Ata 190, Ata 190 Firmware, Ata 191 and 3 more | 2024-02-28 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Multiple vulnerabilities in the Cisco Discovery Protocol functionality of Cisco ATA 190 Series Analog Telephone Adapter firmware could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to cause Cisco Discovery Protocol memory corruption on an affected device. These vulnerabilities are due to missing length validation checks when processing Cisco Discovery Protocol messages. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending a malicious Cisco Discovery Protocol packet to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause an out-of-bounds read of the valid Cisco Discovery Protocol packet data, which could allow the attacker to cause corruption in the internal Cisco Discovery Protocol database of the affected device. | |||||
| CVE-2023-23626 | 1 Protocol | 1 Go-bitfield | 2024-02-28 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| go-bitfield is a simple bitfield package for the go language aiming to be more performant that the standard library. When feeding untrusted user input into the size parameter of `NewBitfield` and `FromBytes` functions, an attacker can trigger `panic`s. This happen when the `size` is a not a multiple of `8` or is negative. There were already a note in the `NewBitfield` documentation, however known users of this package are subject to this issue. Users are advised to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade should ensure that `size` is a multiple of 8 before calling `NewBitfield` or `FromBytes`. | |||||
| CVE-2022-37311 | 1 Open-xchange | 1 Open-xchange Appsuite | 2024-02-28 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| OX App Suite through 7.10.6 has Uncontrolled Resource Consumption via a large location request parameter to the redirect servlet. | |||||
| CVE-2022-20493 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2024-02-28 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In Condition of Condition.java, there is a possible way to grant notification access due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-10 Android-11 Android-12 Android-12L Android-13Android ID: A-242846316 | |||||
| CVE-2021-0934 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2024-02-28 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In findAllDeAccounts of AccountsDb.java, there is a possible denial of service due to resource exhaustion. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-10 Android-11 Android-12 Android-12L Android-13Android ID: A-169762606 | |||||
| CVE-2022-41968 | 1 Nextcloud | 1 Nextcloud Server | 2024-02-28 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Nextcloud Server is an open source personal cloud server. Prior to versions 23.0.10 and 24.0.5, calendar name lengths are not validated before writing to a database. As a result, an attacker can send unnecessary amounts of data against the database. Version 23.0.10 and 24.0.5 contain patches for the issue. No known workarounds are available. | |||||
| CVE-2022-20689 | 1 Cisco | 6 Ata 190, Ata 190 Firmware, Ata 191 and 3 more | 2024-02-28 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Multiple vulnerabilities in the Cisco Discovery Protocol functionality of Cisco ATA 190 Series Analog Telephone Adapter firmware could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to cause Cisco Discovery Protocol memory corruption on an affected device. These vulnerabilities are due to missing length validation checks when processing Cisco Discovery Protocol messages. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending a malicious Cisco Discovery Protocol packet to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause an out-of-bounds read of the valid Cisco Discovery Protocol packet data, which could allow the attacker to cause corruption in the internal Cisco Discovery Protocol database of the affected device. | |||||
| CVE-2022-4111 | 1 Tooljet | 1 Tooljet | 2024-02-28 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Unrestricted file size limit can lead to DoS in tooljet/tooljet <1.27 by allowing a logged in attacker to upload profile pictures over 2MB. | |||||
| CVE-2022-20691 | 1 Cisco | 6 Ata 190, Ata 190 Firmware, Ata 191 and 3 more | 2024-02-28 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the Cisco Discovery Protocol functionality of Cisco ATA 190 Series Adaptive Telephone Adapter firmware could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to cause a DoS condition of an affected device. This vulnerability is due to missing length validation of certain Cisco Discovery Protocol packet header fields. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted Cisco Discovery Protocol packets to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the device to exhaust available memory and cause the service to restart. Cisco has released firmware updates that address this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2022-20543 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2024-02-28 | N/A | 2.3 LOW |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible display crash loop due to improper input validation. This could lead to local denial of service with system execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-13Android ID: A-238178261 | |||||
| CVE-2022-20491 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2024-02-28 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In NotificationChannel of NotificationChannel.java, there is a possible failure to persist permissions settings due to resource exhaustion. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-10 Android-11 Android-12 Android-12L Android-13Android ID: A-242703556 | |||||
| CVE-2022-2592 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2024-02-28 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A lack of length validation in Snippet descriptions in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions prior to 15.1.6, 15.2 prior to 15.2.4 and 15.3 prior to 15.3.2 allows an authenticated attacker to create a maliciously large Snippet which when requested with or without authentication places excessive load on the server, potential leading to Denial of Service. | |||||
| CVE-2022-25793 | 1 Autodesk | 1 3ds Max | 2024-02-28 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| A Stack-based Buffer Overflow Vulnerability in Autodesk 3ds Max 2022, 2021, and 2020 may lead to code execution through the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a fixed-length stack-based buffer when parsing ActionScript Byte Code files. This vulnerability may allow arbitrary code execution on affected installations of Autodesk 3ds Max. | |||||
| CVE-2022-40761 | 1 Samsung | 1 Mtower | 2024-02-28 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| The function tee_obj_free in Samsung mTower through 0.3.0 allows a trusted application to trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by invoking the function TEE_AllocateOperation with a disturbed heap layout, related to utee_cryp_obj_alloc. | |||||
| CVE-2022-39294 | 1 Conduit-hyper Project | 1 Conduit-hyper | 2024-02-28 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| conduit-hyper integrates a conduit application with the hyper server. Prior to version 0.4.2, `conduit-hyper` did not check any limit on a request's length before calling [`hyper::body::to_bytes`](https://docs.rs/hyper/latest/hyper/body/fn.to_bytes.html). An attacker could send a malicious request with an abnormally large `Content-Length`, which could lead to a panic if memory allocation failed for that request. In version 0.4.2, `conduit-hyper` sets an internal limit of 128 MiB per request, otherwise returning status 400 ("Bad Request"). This crate is part of the implementation of Rust's [crates.io](https://crates.io/), but that service is not affected due to its existing cloud infrastructure, which already drops such malicious requests. Even with the new limit in place, `conduit-hyper` is not recommended for production use, nor to directly serve the public Internet. | |||||
| CVE-2022-39313 | 1 Parseplatform | 1 Parse-server | 2024-02-28 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Parse Server is an open source backend that can be deployed to any infrastructure that can run Node.js. Versions prior to 4.10.17, and prior to 5.2.8 on the 5.x branch, crash when a file download request is received with an invalid byte range, resulting in a Denial of Service. This issue has been patched in versions 4.10.17, and 5.2.8. There are no known workarounds. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2868 | 3 Debian, Fedoraproject, Libtiff | 3 Debian Linux, Fedora, Libtiff | 2024-02-28 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| libtiff's tiffcrop utility has a improper input validation flaw that can lead to out of bounds read and ultimately cause a crash if an attacker is able to supply a crafted file to tiffcrop. | |||||
| CVE-2022-21208 | 1 Node-opcua Project | 1 Node-opcua | 2024-02-28 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| The package node-opcua before 2.74.0 are vulnerable to Denial of Service (DoS) due to a missing limitation on the number of received chunks - per single session or in total for all concurrent sessions. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending an unlimited number of huge chunks (e.g. 2GB each) without sending the Final closing chunk. | |||||