Total
756 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-28560 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 6 Acrobat, Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Acrobat Reader DC versions versions 2021.001.20150 (and earlier), 2020.001.30020 (and earlier) and 2017.011.30194 (and earlier) are affected by a Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker could leverage this vulnerability to achieve arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | |||||
| CVE-2021-28558 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 6 Acrobat, Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Acrobat Reader DC versions versions 2021.001.20150 (and earlier), 2020.001.30020 (and earlier) and 2017.011.30194 (and earlier) are affected by an Heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the PDFLibTool component. An unauthenticated attacker could leverage this vulnerability to achieve arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | |||||
| CVE-2021-25668 | 1 Siemens | 58 Scalance X200-4p Irt, Scalance X200-4p Irt Firmware, Scalance X201-3p Irt and 55 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SCALANCE X200-4P IRT (All versions < 5.5.1), SCALANCE X201-3P IRT (All versions < 5.5.1), SCALANCE X201-3P IRT PRO (All versions < 5.5.1), SCALANCE X202-2 IRT (All versions < 5.5.1), SCALANCE X202-2P IRT (incl. SIPLUS NET variant) (All versions < 5.5.1), SCALANCE X202-2P IRT PRO (All versions < 5.5.1), SCALANCE X204 IRT (All versions < 5.5.1), SCALANCE X204 IRT PRO (All versions < 5.5.1), SCALANCE X204-2 (incl. SIPLUS NET variant) (All versions < V5.2.5), SCALANCE X204-2FM (All versions < V5.2.5), SCALANCE X204-2LD (incl. SIPLUS NET variant) (All versions < V5.2.5), SCALANCE X204-2LD TS (All versions < V5.2.5), SCALANCE X204-2TS (All versions < V5.2.5), SCALANCE X206-1 (All versions < V5.2.5), SCALANCE X206-1LD (All versions < V5.2.5), SCALANCE X208 (incl. SIPLUS NET variant) (All versions < V5.2.5), SCALANCE X208PRO (All versions < V5.2.5), SCALANCE X212-2 (incl. SIPLUS NET variant) (All versions < V5.2.5), SCALANCE X212-2LD (All versions < V5.2.5), SCALANCE X216 (All versions < V5.2.5), SCALANCE X224 (All versions < V5.2.5), SCALANCE XF201-3P IRT (All versions < 5.5.1), SCALANCE XF202-2P IRT (All versions < 5.5.1), SCALANCE XF204 (All versions < V5.2.5), SCALANCE XF204 IRT (All versions < 5.5.1), SCALANCE XF204-2 (incl. SIPLUS NET variant) (All versions < V5.2.5), SCALANCE XF204-2BA IRT (All versions < 5.5.1), SCALANCE XF206-1 (All versions < V5.2.5), SCALANCE XF208 (All versions < V5.2.5). Incorrect processing of POST requests in the webserver may result in write out of bounds in heap. An attacker might leverage this to cause denial-of-service on the device and potentially remotely execute code. | |||||
| CVE-2021-21946 | 1 Accusoft | 1 Imagegear | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Two heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities exists in the JPEG-JFIF lossless Huffman image parser functionality of Accusoft ImageGear 19.10. A specially-crafted file can lead to a heap buffer overflow. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger these vulnerabilities.This heap-based buffer overflow takes place when the `SOF3` precision is lower than 9. | |||||
| CVE-2021-21945 | 1 Accusoft | 1 Imagegear | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Two heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the TIFF parser functionality of Accusoft ImageGear 19.10. A specially-crafted file can lead to a heap buffer overflow. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger these vulnerabilities.This heap-based buffer oveflow takes place trying to copy the second 12 bits from local variable. | |||||
| CVE-2021-21944 | 1 Accusoft | 1 Imagegear | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Two heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the TIFF parser functionality of Accusoft ImageGear 19.10. A specially-crafted file can lead to a heap buffer overflow. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger these vulnerabilities.This heap-based buffer oveflow takes place trying to copy the first 12 bits from local variable. | |||||
| CVE-2021-21006 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 3 Photoshop, Macos, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.6 HIGH |
| Adobe Photoshop version 22.1 (and earlier) is affected by a heap buffer overflow vulnerability when handling a specially crafted font file. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | |||||
| CVE-2020-7586 | 1 Siemens | 4 Simatic Pcs 7, Simatic Process Device Manager, Simatic Step 7 and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC PCS 7 V8.2 and earlier (All versions), SIMATIC PCS 7 V9.0 (All versions < V9.0 SP3), SIMATIC PDM (All versions < V9.2), SIMATIC STEP 7 V5.X (All versions < V5.6 SP2 HF3), SINAMICS STARTER (containing STEP 7 OEM version) (All versions < V5.4 HF2). A buffer overflow vulnerability could allow a local attacker to cause a Denial-of-Service situation. The security vulnerability could be exploited by an attacker with local access to the affected systems. Successful exploitation requires user privileges but no user interaction. The vulnerability could allow an attacker to compromise the availability of the system as well as to have access to confidential information. | |||||
| CVE-2020-4068 | 1 Apnswift Project | 1 Apnswift | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 6.3 MEDIUM |
| In APNSwift 1.0.0, calling APNSwiftSigner.sign(digest:) is likely to result in a heap buffer overflow. This has been fixed in 1.0.1. | |||||
| CVE-2020-27841 | 4 Debian, Fedoraproject, Oracle and 1 more | 4 Debian Linux, Fedora, Outside In Technology and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| There's a flaw in openjpeg in versions prior to 2.4.0 in src/lib/openjp2/pi.c. When an attacker is able to provide crafted input to be processed by the openjpeg encoder, this could cause an out-of-bounds read. The greatest impact from this flaw is to application availability. | |||||
| CVE-2020-27829 | 1 Imagemagick | 1 Imagemagick | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A heap based buffer overflow in coders/tiff.c may result in program crash and denial of service in ImageMagick before 7.0.10-45. | |||||
| CVE-2020-27814 | 2 Debian, Uclouvain | 2 Debian Linux, Openjpeg | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| A heap-buffer overflow was found in the way openjpeg2 handled certain PNG format files. An attacker could use this flaw to cause an application crash or in some cases execute arbitrary code with the permission of the user running such an application. | |||||
| CVE-2020-27752 | 1 Imagemagick | 1 Imagemagick | 2024-11-21 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.1 HIGH |
| A flaw was found in ImageMagick in MagickCore/quantum-private.h. An attacker who submits a crafted file that is processed by ImageMagick could trigger a heap buffer overflow. This would most likely lead to an impact to application availability, but could potentially lead to an impact to data integrity as well. This flaw affects ImageMagick versions prior to 7.0.9-0. | |||||
| CVE-2020-27255 | 1 Rockwellautomation | 1 Factorytalk Linx | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A heap overflow vulnerability exists within FactoryTalk Linx Version 6.11 and prior. This vulnerability could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to send malicious set attribute requests, which could result in the leaking of sensitive information. This information disclosure could lead to the bypass of address space layout randomization (ASLR). | |||||
| CVE-2020-27251 | 1 Rockwellautomation | 1 Factorytalk Linx | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A heap overflow vulnerability exists within FactoryTalk Linx Version 6.11 and prior. This vulnerability could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to send malicious port ranges, which could result in remote code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2020-25712 | 2 Redhat, X.org | 2 Enterprise Linux, X Server | 2024-11-21 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| A flaw was found in xorg-x11-server before 1.20.10. A heap-buffer overflow in XkbSetDeviceInfo may lead to a privilege escalation vulnerability. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability. | |||||
| CVE-2020-25687 | 3 Debian, Fedoraproject, Thekelleys | 3 Debian Linux, Fedora, Dnsmasq | 2024-11-21 | 7.1 HIGH | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in dnsmasq before version 2.83. A heap-based buffer overflow was discovered in dnsmasq when DNSSEC is enabled and before it validates the received DNS entries. This flaw allows a remote attacker, who can create valid DNS replies, to cause an overflow in a heap-allocated memory. This flaw is caused by the lack of length checks in rfc1035.c:extract_name(), which could be abused to make the code execute memcpy() with a negative size in sort_rrset() and cause a crash in dnsmasq, resulting in a denial of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability. | |||||
| CVE-2020-25683 | 3 Debian, Fedoraproject, Thekelleys | 3 Debian Linux, Fedora, Dnsmasq | 2024-11-21 | 7.1 HIGH | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in dnsmasq before version 2.83. A heap-based buffer overflow was discovered in dnsmasq when DNSSEC is enabled and before it validates the received DNS entries. A remote attacker, who can create valid DNS replies, could use this flaw to cause an overflow in a heap-allocated memory. This flaw is caused by the lack of length checks in rfc1035.c:extract_name(), which could be abused to make the code execute memcpy() with a negative size in get_rdata() and cause a crash in dnsmasq, resulting in a denial of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability. | |||||
| CVE-2020-25682 | 3 Debian, Fedoraproject, Thekelleys | 3 Debian Linux, Fedora, Dnsmasq | 2024-11-21 | 8.3 HIGH | 8.1 HIGH |
| A flaw was found in dnsmasq before 2.83. A buffer overflow vulnerability was discovered in the way dnsmasq extract names from DNS packets before validating them with DNSSEC data. An attacker on the network, who can create valid DNS replies, could use this flaw to cause an overflow with arbitrary data in a heap-allocated memory, possibly executing code on the machine. The flaw is in the rfc1035.c:extract_name() function, which writes data to the memory pointed by name assuming MAXDNAME*2 bytes are available in the buffer. However, in some code execution paths, it is possible extract_name() gets passed an offset from the base buffer, thus reducing, in practice, the number of available bytes that can be written in the buffer. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability. | |||||
| CVE-2020-25681 | 3 Debian, Fedoraproject, Thekelleys | 3 Debian Linux, Fedora, Dnsmasq | 2024-11-21 | 8.3 HIGH | 8.1 HIGH |
| A flaw was found in dnsmasq before version 2.83. A heap-based buffer overflow was discovered in the way RRSets are sorted before validating with DNSSEC data. An attacker on the network, who can forge DNS replies such as that they are accepted as valid, could use this flaw to cause a buffer overflow with arbitrary data in a heap memory segment, possibly executing code on the machine. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability. | |||||