gssproxy (aka gss-proxy) before 0.8.3 does not unlock cond_mutex before pthread exit in gp_worker_main() in gp_workers.c. NOTE: An upstream comment states "We are already on a shutdown path when running the code in question, so a DoS there doesn't make any sense, and there has been no additional information provided us (as upstream) to indicate why this would be a problem.
References
Link | Resource |
---|---|
https://github.com/gssapi/gssproxy/commit/cb761412e299ef907f22cd7c4146d50c8a792003 | Patch Third Party Advisory |
https://github.com/gssapi/gssproxy/compare/v0.8.2...v0.8.3 | Third Party Advisory |
https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/01/msg00004.html | Mailing List Third Party Advisory |
https://pagure.io/gssproxy/c/cb761412e299ef907f22cd7c4146d50c8a792003?branch=master | Third Party Advisory |
https://github.com/gssapi/gssproxy/commit/cb761412e299ef907f22cd7c4146d50c8a792003 | Patch Third Party Advisory |
https://github.com/gssapi/gssproxy/compare/v0.8.2...v0.8.3 | Third Party Advisory |
https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/01/msg00004.html | Mailing List Third Party Advisory |
https://pagure.io/gssproxy/c/cb761412e299ef907f22cd7c4146d50c8a792003?branch=master | Third Party Advisory |
Configurations
History
21 Nov 2024, 05:00
Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
---|---|---|
References | () https://github.com/gssapi/gssproxy/commit/cb761412e299ef907f22cd7c4146d50c8a792003 - Patch, Third Party Advisory | |
References | () https://github.com/gssapi/gssproxy/compare/v0.8.2...v0.8.3 - Third Party Advisory | |
References | () https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/01/msg00004.html - Mailing List, Third Party Advisory | |
References | () https://pagure.io/gssproxy/c/cb761412e299ef907f22cd7c4146d50c8a792003?branch=master - Third Party Advisory |
07 Nov 2023, 03:15
Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
---|---|---|
Summary | gssproxy (aka gss-proxy) before 0.8.3 does not unlock cond_mutex before pthread exit in gp_worker_main() in gp_workers.c. NOTE: An upstream comment states "We are already on a shutdown path when running the code in question, so a DoS there doesn't make any sense, and there has been no additional information provided us (as upstream) to indicate why this would be a problem. |
Information
Published : 2020-12-31 01:15
Updated : 2024-11-21 05:00
NVD link : CVE-2020-12658
Mitre link : CVE-2020-12658
CVE.ORG link : CVE-2020-12658
JSON object : View
Products Affected
debian
- debian_linux
gssproxy_project
- gssproxy
CWE
CWE-667
Improper Locking